Bwahahahaha - Michelle Malkin banned from You Tube

:rofl:

Banned on YouTube

By Michelle Malkin · October 04, 2006 11:28 AM

Back in February, you may remember, I cobbled together a little mini-movie called "First, They Came" inspired by the Mohammed Cartoon riots. It's a simple slideshow highlighting the victims of Islamic violence over the years. We posted it at YouTube a while ago. No problems. Until last week, when I received this e-mail:




I asked YouTube to inform me of the exact nature of the "inappropriateness" of the video. But no response. The banning of my innocuous video is not an isolated incident. Anti-jihad YouTube users have reported having their videos yanked and accounts suspended, including Crusader18. Another YT user, Intelsum, writes:

It has come to my attention that Jihadis organized a campaign against us to have our videos removed by You Tube. Some people’s accounts have even been terminated. I don’t know exactly how the You Tube suspension system works, but it looks like a video will be removed if it gets a certain number of complaints (which may be accepted without investigation), and an account gets closed when the third video is removed. One of my videos was recently removed for “inappropriate content.” The video, ‘It’s In The Koran’ could be viewed at http://www.terrorfreeoil.org/videos/ItsInTheKoran.php, second screen (alternative video source). This video contains no sexually explicit content and could only be offensive to Muslims who reject any notion of criticism. At the same time, many al-Qaeda propaganda videos, Nazi videos, etc. are posted on You Tube.
Strangely, my conservative YouTube group (now nearly 1,000 members strong) has also now been "flagged" for containing "content that is inappropriate for some users."

Yeah, inappropriate for members of the Religion of Perpetual Outrage.

Some users are proposing a YT boycott. But I think the better approach is to stay and fight--and persuade DhimmiTube to rethink its policies. Will any criticism of jihad qualify as "hate" under its terms of use guidelines? Why did the banning of anti-jihad videos only start now--in the wake of YouTube's embarrassment over jihad propaganda videos exploding on its site as reported by the Honolulu Star-Bulletin earlier this month?

We posted a video appeal to YouTube management. Watch, send, embed, and pass it around if you have a chance. Maybe they'll respond:

http://michellemalkin.com/

no one wants to see your cheesy video, you unhinged bitch :rofl:

(Sorry, I HAD to use that.)

:rofl:

:evilgrin:

The marketplace rules all. The owners want to yank her sorry little video, so it's gone. She has nothing left to say except to whine that it's unfair.

Maybe she can start her own spinoff "anti-jihad" MeSoHornyTube for uploading hate flicks.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

He's followed the Nazi playbook line-by-line.

Shame on you.

And, just for your information, if we won't even let Christians force their religion on people, what chance do you think muslims will have against us?

who has showed us over and over what a nasty freak she is. You have just showed disdain for an entire world wide religion.

That is shameful!

what if I called you an unhinged kool aid drinking putz?

would that make things better?

Not too "abusive" of me, I hope?

:eyes:

You abusive SoB


:hi:

Don't know quite just why . . .
Have a :beer: on me, won't you?

:hi:

REALLY irritating when it gets up there from burying my head, doncha know?

after all, I'm told that, because of people like us, if we don't pray to Allah, we will die.

That sometimes I forget to pray to Allah for healing.

That is, when I'm not listening to 2 Live Crew and Korn backwards for coded satanic messages, smoking dope and generally oppressing and exploiting women, children and farm animals.

Within United States.'" - Condoleeza Rice, 8 April 2004.

Oh, I'm sorry, that's one thing that Bush ISN'T doing right - my bad!!

He's just like you and me, and he is the kind of guy you could sit down and have a beer with (well, that is, you could, if he weren't such an alcoholic).

And he is great because he didn't let work interrupt his vacation and his time with his family.

Neither would you or I, right?


We should applaud Bush for doing nothing during his monthlong vacation

Yes. George Bush is the only thing standing between us and total destruction of the U.S. Constitution, and the implementation of a Theocratic Government here in the United States.

But to achieve this noble agenda, he needs to totally destroy the U.S. Consititution, and implement a Theocratic Government here, in the United States.

Wake the fuck up, Pizza Boy.

however long it may be.

"magical" free market, which controls all

that last line made me laugh merrily... thanks CW :)

borrowed from FZ

what a horrid woman

From the feces that flows from her face hole, obviously she has had her own shit come to life and she has done deep throat on it.

Is YouTube under attack by the GOP?

:shrug:

Don’t you understand that actual censorship of Michelle Malkin is putative censorship of you? That her free speech rights are also yours. And that while she is the immediate and most obvious target of jihadist propagandists, you are next. For they despise liberalism above all. They despise homosexual rights, women’s rights and every secular prerogative. While they wish Michelle Malkin dead, I believe somewhere behind their wish is a kind of respect for her defiance. But I’m afraid that their only feeling for you, with your apologies for their intimidation and your denial of their barbarity, is contempt.

Defense of Michelle Malkin’s right to speak her mind, however detestable and difficult you find it, is your best and only self-defense. We stand together on this issue, or we’re finished. Please recall the words of Voltaire, one of the great liberals of history.

.........she has no "right" to post on it. The vile bitch can post on her own site - which she does. Youtube isn't doesn't have to put up with her hate-filled shit stinking up the joint.

This site is full of hypocrites. Name calling and no substance or direction, kind of like Dems in Congress.

cool.

Just watch.

.

You are not welcome here, because you enable leaders with no conscience to take actions which benefit only themselves, at the expense of even their own supporters.

You are welcome at free republic dot com. It's where you'll find hypocrisy and name calling that's much more suited to your warped worldview.

lights out for pervert worshippers.

Cool!

....comprehension of our/your rights to free speech on a private web-site versus, say, the public square. No. You barge in hear like an eighth-grader crying "free speech, free speech."

Grow up.

I always enjoy a first post that defends a wingnut!

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Tell this one to go suck a tailpipe.

Chimpy wants us to enjoy Indian mangoes!!!

And I'm not usually big on mango. But this was tasty.

She is absolutely free to buy her own servers and pay for her own bandwidth to publish her videos.

She has utterly zero right to demand that YouTube carry her videos.

If I set up a service like YouTube on my dime, and you posted things that, in my sole discretion, I didn't like, then I would have every right to take it down and tell you to get bent.

Where did she get the "right" to force some private property owner to do her bidding with their property?

And welcome to DU.

:hi:

I haven't watched the video myself, so I don't know if YouTube was reasonable in removing it. I'm almost afraid to look at it, because I might find myself agreeing with you and - ack! :puke: - defending Malkin. Whose writing is normally godawful tripe.

I guess I'm on the fence...YouTube has a right as a private site to have an editorial POV, I guess, but I'd probably hate it if their POV resulted in banning of liberal opinions and giving free rein to Malkin and Coulter-ish spew. (Your point exactly, I think)

Anyway, I'm happy to see someone here who is brave enough to take the ACLU line. I just hope the response to your post hasn't turned you off to DU - the likes of Malkin are really, really hard to defend around here, even on a liberal principle. Kudos to you for trying.

As a conservative, Malkin should understand that.

to cleanse the world of all the content she finds "objectionable", starting with those skanky shots of her in a bikini circa 1992.

I'd defend her, but I'm busy.

That's why I want to see them voted THE FUCK OUT OF MY GOVERNMENT.

Since it is privately owned, a more accurate description would be "removed".

For example, I can call someone a bitch in my own home (maybe not morally, but legally), but I can't say it at work.

Another example would be defending Al Gore at Free Republic's website. If I started a FR account just to go there and defend an individual they despise, they would be right to remove me.

Still another example might be someone who comes to Democratic Underground and immediately defends Michelle Malkin, and is consequently removed from DU.

Not a single constitutional right is being violated in any of these examples.

of someone who tries to take away the free speech of others?

Why do conservatives like you always equate "free speech" with the right to be an asshole and insult and slander others, but want to draw the line at things like artistic expression or dissent?

basement of the White House as your freak you had the Court select to be in our White House doesn't believe in having anything fair. The media has shut us out through their 6 richie owners and you have the nerve to come here and complain about "your" goofy bitch Michelle? Go piss on your issue. It will help it more than posting it here.

ever notice the resemblance?

They'll watch it.

I can hear it now..

they are racist against unhinged idiot Phillipinos

Christians are always outraged about something.

of consenting adult porn to wail about the unfairness of this whole deal.

She stated that one time on her Web site.

that try and pass themselves off as humans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLqvHK2CPB4&eurl=

(In case anyone else wants to flag it as inappropriate. :D )