|
Edited on Wed Oct-04-06 04:37 PM by meldroc
:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:
Many people, here on DU, and elsewhere, are of the opinion that the reason why Bush and the neocons invaded Iraq was for oil. But, they're not in there to sell the oil - while they'll make some money if they suddenly opened Iraq's oil wells to the market, oil prices would go down, and the margin would be rather thin. Rather, they took the oil to take it OFF the market. Squeeze the supply, make things more volatile, and prices go up, while the costs of producing oil elsewhere, from Saudi Arabia to the Gulf of Mexico, stay the same. Huge margins, HUGE PROFITS.
Now to put this on topic. Since Iraq's in the neocon's pockets right now, mostly with disrupted oil production, they now have a huge knob they can turn to control supply, and hence control oil prices. Since the neocons want to retain power, and know that gas prices are inversely proportional to Republican popularity, all they have to do is let a little more oil out of Iraq. All of the sudden, there's a glut in supply, the market prices go down, we see prices at the pump go down, and a few of the more gullible among us vote Republican. After the election's over, just have a few IEDs take out some pipelines or other oil facilities in Iraq, that glut dries up, the market prices go back up, and it's back to profits as usual.
Yeah, I know, :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:
|