Rim Job the freeper leader gets it wrong again. Typical

Check out this spin.

Perhaps the Democrats are having a change of heart?
Jim Robinson

Posted on 10/04/2006 3:53:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Sounds like the Democrats want to get serious about protecting youngsters from homosexual predators. Hoorah! It's a little late but could be a good. idea!

Maybe we should start by removing homosexuals from all positions where they would have access to young people. Removing them from congress would be a good start, but we need to follow through by removing them from organizations such as the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, military, churches, universities and schools.

And from our state governments. For example, I think about one third of our local California reps would be gone if this trend catches on. If we want to protect young people from homosexual predators, I think it would be a good idea to keep them from dominating our legislative bodies.

By the way, they should also stop forcing the "normalization" of perverted homosexual lifestyles on our children and our society in general. If children are brought up thinking homosexual perversions are perfectly normal and welcome activities, doesn't this expose them to the danger of being susceptible to advances by homosexual predators? How about teaching them to suspect and avoid the advances of over friendly teachers, ministers, counselors, congressmen and other homos in positions of trust? Makes sense to me.

Yup. Run 'em out of congress on a rail! Go Democrats!! Good start!!

It's only about "homosexual" predators now? I wonder which other kind of crime happens way more often...

It's about predatory sexual behavior, and, as a straight guy, I'll bet the entire farm that there's far more of this loathsome behavior done by hetero guys who are hitting on young girls. :grr:

My brother is gay, and he's had steadier relationships that I've had, for crying out loud.

Foley was republican, a GAY republican. Yes it's true, lot's of gay republicans too, they are just too scared to publicly admit it because of people like Jim Robinson.

Hate mongers. Almost all sexual attacks on young girls (and young boys)are perpetrated by men. So, should no adult man be allowed unsupervised time with children? Heterosexual or homosexual, it doesn't matter.

And for everyone ready to trot out the overused trope "but women commit sex offenses too!" just stuff it. The overwhelming majority are men.

When the arguement that no adult male (or adolescent for that matter) is safe around children of either gender, the absurdity of their arguement is quite evident.

Or is it only important if males are being sexually abused. And that part was rhetorical. We all know that's the heart of the matter for these asswipes!