Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fordham Himself is Gay, Scarborough: Foley-Fordham "as close as possible"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:30 AM
Original message
Fordham Himself is Gay, Scarborough: Foley-Fordham "as close as possible"


Here's the latest and the greatest, Kirk Fordham, Reynolds' former Chief of Staff, and Foley's former Chief of Staff, is himself gay, and perhaps had a relationship with Mark Foley.

Joe Scarborough said last night that Foley and Fordham were "as close as possible -- politically".

In the past, Fordham has told the Blade that he is “out in the community but not in the press.” The Blade reported last week that Fordham is gay.

Before moving to the Martinez campaign earlier this year, Fordham was the campaign manager and then the chief of staff for Florida Congressman Mark Foley, a Republican.

It has been widely reported that Foley is gay, but the congressman continues to refuse to discuss his sexual orientation. When reports about it surfaced during his aborted Senate campaign last year, Foley held a news conference denouncing the “rumors” and calling the talk about his sexual orientation “revolting and unforgivable.”

Jason Kello, a spokesperson for Foley, declined to say if Fordham was out while he worked as Foley’s chief of staff.

“We’re not going to get into a discussion on Kirk’s personal life,” Kello said. “Kirk was a terrific chief of staff and Congressman Foley was sorry to see him go. Kirk did tremendous work here, and I can say there was a very comfortable office environment.”


Kello said it would not matter one way or the other to Foley if Fordham were gay. Foley has a nondiscrimination policy for his employees that includes protection based on sexual orientation, Kello said.

An August 2003 article in the Advocate, the national gay magazine, matter-of-factly identified Fordham as Foley’s gay chief of staff.

http://www.washblade.com/2004/7-16/news/breaking/two.cfm


If you think the evangelical base should know how many anti-gay gay Republicans there are, PLEASE RECOMMEND. If there are too many, the base will stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is what Lawrence O'Donnell was talking about on Scarborough...
He said the real story will be that the closeted gay Republicans kept it secret or something, or that the Republican base will be surprised at how many gays work in the party.

I bet the person that Fordham told was also gay in Hastert's office. This is the reason they took the political risk of keeping it quiet, they didn't want to break the GOP big tent of homophobes and "thinking" conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Check out David Corn's blog about this."The List," is ready to go public..
The List of high ranking gay staffers. Seems to be many. So many that your average Billy-bob, right wing, God-fearin' Repug voter is gonna be shocked.

Go to http://www.davidcorn.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I think that may affect the elections more...
and may even cause the fundies to form a Christian Democratic party, or something similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. We could probably find out the people:
"What's interesting about The List--which includes nine chiefs of staffs, two press secretaries, and two directors of communications--is that (if it's accurate) it shows that some of the religious right's favorite representatives and senators have gay staffers helping them advance their political careers and agendas. These include Representative Katherine Harris and Henry Hyde and Senators Bill Frist, George Allen, Mitch McConnell and Rick Santorum. Should we salute these legislators for being open-minded enough to have such tolerant hiring practices? After all, Santorum in a 2003 AP interview compared homosexuality to bestiality, incest and polygamy. It would be rather big of Santorum to employ a fellow who engages in activity akin to such horrors. That is, if Santorum knows about his orientation."

Um, if we find single people working as chiefs of staff and press secretaries and directors of communication, wouldn't that kind of be specific enough to find out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Gay Republicans
What kind of twisted, self loathing psyches do these people have? It CAN'T be all about tax cuts with these people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. careful
the GOP wants to turn this into a witch hunt,and blame them for this scandal, and lump pedophiles with homesexuals.
dont give them any help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. As Al Franken said last night on Scarborough's show:
"The difference is our gay guys (the Democrats) aren't anti-gay, like your gay guys (the Republicans)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I don't think the OP is doing that, but the GOP is
and since we all suspect there are few at the top of the GOP leadership who have normal, boring sex lives, we know they're going to implode.

That's what the right does best, the witch hunt, and how that hunt has them turning on themselves.

I wondered why Fordham was fired, and now I know. I think Fordham probably did keep it quiet for as many as 10 years, but one page decided he'd had enough, thanks, and started to circulate the evidence. Hastert knew for at least a year, probably longer. Hastert is responsible for trying to keep the lid on since then.

I doubt they'll try a witch hunt in the rest of the country, getting out gays and lesbians fired from their jobs, etc., like they did in the days of the black list 50s, at least beyond their own party. There are a lot more gays and lesbians that there ever were Communists, for one thing.

I dunno, I grew up on the fringes of showbiz, so I've always seen the whole range of sexuality as normal, so maybe it's just me. I just don't think they can muster enough people with torches and pitchforks to do what you are afraid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. self delete
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 10:08 AM by fishnfla
2nd thought: you're right





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well, that certainly doesn't take any thought at all, of course
they will. The religious nutcake base will vote against anyond who has any sort of a sex life, gay or straight. Their screwball death cult has always been pro war and anti reproduction. Well, anti reporoduction that feels good.

There is nothing we can do about the 25% of the country that is hard core crazy but defeat them and push them back to the lunatic fringe where they can be left alone to be as crazy as they want to be.

I think the fallout from the internal witch hunt will eventually cause the GOP to split from the sex phobic religious nutcases. They may be a handy voting bloc, but they're also turning off the GOP rank and file.

This too shall pass, as anyone who has suffered a bout of constipation knows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Hey JOE--what about that dead girl in your office???
Worst case scenario: "Getting caught with a dead girl... or a live boy."

Looks like you and Foley are two sides of the same coin, Joe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Yes, I'm afraid of where this goes
Instead of gaining acceptance for gays, and dashing homophobia, I can easily see this all turn into a witch hunt of any gay politician. From there, to any gay person.

They're working very hard to conflate child molestation with homosexuality. This is the logical next step. We have watched how it's done: just see the Catholic church and the demonization of homosexuals instead of the bishops who refused to deal with child molesters in their midst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is just nuts. The issue is NOT about being gay, it's about
being a predator on same-sex kids.

This is just getting out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Even more it's being a predator
on kids, period. This would be just as bad if he was sending nasty IMs to females. But since he picked boys it is easier to blame gay as a diversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Now it's also about anti-gay gays like Foley and Fordham
who sanctimoniuosly push homophobia and anit-gay legislation like DOMA. THe gay community itself has decided outing anti-gay gays to the Republican base is now VERY IMPORTANT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't blame them I would too.
This could be more than a one pronged attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Nope.. It is about being gay.. How many have been caught going
after the female pages.. It has to be going on. Just using statistical information will tell you that. It is all about GAYS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Right. It isn't about being gay, but that is why they began the coverup.
It's all tied together. How many openly gay members of the GOP are there? This is how the big powers in the GOP suppress the little powers in the GOP. That's why the issue is so explosive, because people are going to find out that there are just as many GOP gays as there are gays in the Democratic party.

I, for one, would like for all of them to be honest about their sexuality, so maybe the GOP can stop using the gay issue as a wedge once and for all. There are just so many more important priorities in life than someone's personal choice of partner if that partner is a consenting adult.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, I do..KNR.
I hope fordham doesn't go down without taking denny with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. .
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 09:52 AM by Hav
That won't discourage the anti-gay base, it will energize them if they can frame it as an issue that equates the "gay-lifestyle" or how they call it with pedophilia.

Should we really try to "out" gay Republicans? It seems to be dirty politics. On the other side, if there are quite many openly gay Republicans, it may help to fight some taboos about one of the Repub's favourite wedge issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. It seems the repuke party has more gays than the Democratic party.
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrub chipper Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. Of course, this just makes it easier
for the Wingnuts to consider this a 'GAY' problem, rather than an abuse of popwer cover up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. I will in no way, shape or form participate in a gay witch-hunt
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Before playing into the hands gay repukes you may want to read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. having 'their party' 'riddled' with gays is going to lose them buckets
of votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Too bad about the election rigging. *bummed*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Scarborough also said they were "inseparable"
I nearly fell out of my chair. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Oh, man, this is more muddying of the waters
Gay = Pedophile. Pedophile = Gay.

This is going to start an anti-Gay Jihad, mark my words.

Also, Fordham was the one credible voice because he now has nothing left to lose. If he gets painted with the same gay/pedophile brush, he loses all credibility to implicate higher-ups (read: Hastert, Reynolds).

What a disaster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
29. LOL @ "anti-gay gay Republicans" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC