Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Predict: Rs Have Conceded Election, Will Challenge Results In Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:52 PM
Original message
I Predict: Rs Have Conceded Election, Will Challenge Results In Court
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 12:55 PM by stopbush
The Rs announced that they would spend $40MM this election in negative ads aimed at the "dirt" they
had on Dems. That might have worked pre-Foley, but the worm has now turned and their chances are non existent
to hold the House. They are close to losing the Senate. $100MM in negative ads wouldn't work at this point.

This is too much of an uphill battle for them to fight and win in 4 weeks. So their only real chance is to
challenge the vote itself after the election. They will blame it on e-voting, stating that the Ds have been in the
forefront on criticizing e-voting as unreliable. They will also say that post-Foley, Americans deserve to know
that their Congress critters were elected fairly and without prejudice or machine malfunction. They will frame the issue
as their "protecting the voting rights of all Americans, no matter what their political stripe."

They have the money to pay for challenges and recounts across the country, but they will concentrate on the closest
races. They will need to turn only 1-3 Senate races and maybe 10 House races to their favor to keep control of Congress.

Ultimately, they can keep control of both houses simply by keeping the elections up in the air and uncertified through the
day that Congress reconvenes in 2007...at which point, Denny Hastert can seat anyone he wants in the House (citing his recent
actions in the House as precedent) and declare that the House recognizes them as the legitimate winner. He may even seat
a few Ds to make it look bipartisan while, of course, keeping an R majority in the House.

Rs have a very good record on "winning" elections in the courts (or otherwise) and they have no morals, so it's a road that they
are more than willing to travel.

Paranoid, yes, but why shouldn't I be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. When fox covered evoting issues a few weeks ago 1st thing I thought
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 12:55 PM by redacted
was that they might be planting a seed. In case they lose. How like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes. Why has Lou Dobbs (CNN-Wolf in Sheep's Clothing) been
hammering e-voting for the better part of 4 months?

The Rs have laid a groundwork that they believe can handle events as traumatic as Foleygate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. same here - - preparing a TRACEABLE trail that leads to a Democrat or two.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is NEVER paranoid to voice your distrust when it comes to BushInc.
Because they always find some new level of deceit - and they still do control most media.

I predict they will SET UP some Democrats with the electronic machines and make the code TRACEABLE to someone in the Dem party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. entirely possible -- but it won't work as well, this time
They had the element of surprise when the Supreme "Court" appointed Bush -- such blatant election thieving had rarely been done in broad daylight.

And while it's not to say they won't try it, I'd like to think that even the Dems will be savvy enough to raise holy hell.

Plus, this could backfire if previous "elections" become part of the evidence trail in such cases...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Plus, Americans have now accepted contested elections as the norm.
This won't happen in a bubble. The Rs will make an issue of it this time because it's their ox being gored (no pun intended).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I expect an increase in dirty tricks.
Flyers giving false info on polling stations, saying Ds are to vote on the day after election day, if you or anyone in your family has ever been arrested you can't vote or you go to jail for 10 years, etc. All stops are being pulled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. If 2004 in Ohio is any indication...
They will use every trick in the book. You can count on it.

Voter Suppression
Voter Intimidation
Vote Fraud
Ballot Fraud
Ballot Manipulation

They'll lose ballots... Misdirect ballots... Cage voters...
Contest voters... Create some sort of 'poll tax' disguised
as a so-called 'Voter ID Card'.

Steal what they can with electronic machines.
Steal what they can with mechanical machines.

Why do you think they were so reluctant to renew the Right-to-Vote Act
awhile back?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. You are not paranoid if they are out to get you
guess what, they are out to get you, and me and everybody else

My prediction is... don't count them chickens, or scrambled eggs... I predict nothing will change. This does not not meant I won't vote or work for change... but as stalin said, it does not matter who voets but who counts the vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. That'd be the ultimate irony considering
this issue has being ignored for years. And I wouldn't put it past them either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC