|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:06 AM Original message |
The DoD scanned my ports yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. They are my ports very infrequently - I wonder why - are they trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Is this becoming a weekly mandatory post? It's HUGH!!?!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamin lib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. How do you capture this information? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'd like to know, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Ditto that question. Inquiring minds... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. you look at your firewall logs, get their domain name then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Hmm. Maybe we should collect their domain names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I'm an idiot. How do I look up my firewall log? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. If you bring up your FW program, there should be a "view log" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. Check a google search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QuettaKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Are you saying the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Mine was DoD, from their computer information center. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
49. Could be spoofed packets from script-kiddies, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clara T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
12. kick for info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. They scanned me, also in July, apparently. WTF????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. That is sure scary as hell . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patriotvoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Scanning ports isn't spying, it's reconnaissance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. heh heh heh... don't need no stink'n warrant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. junior and his games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Serious games their partner. Serious enough to IMPEACH HIM! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I don't want junior impeached! I want him to be the laughing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I want all that and IMPEACHMENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 06:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
65. Yes! You said it - exactly the way I feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. The Administration is breaking every law and they don't care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. Keep copies and send to your representatives with a letter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Good idea, although I wouldn't bother with Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freedom_Aflaim (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
25. IMO, its not what you think it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. No it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freedom_Aflaim (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. Then the spooks are pretty inept. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. Do you belong to Mynetwatchman or DShield? Or another? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 11:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
66. What are the results of post-IP change visits to DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ioo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
27. Do you think they make deals with Firewall vendors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. Good detective work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkTirade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Although you have to admit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. And you believe the DoD is clueless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. It's a huge series of networks and yes, they've been both hacked into and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkTirade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 03:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
63. The DOD as a whole? Probably not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. there was some other DUer that was getting these scans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babsbunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
31. Hey, I'm in Ohio Too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mich Otter (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. What if the log has only numbers, no names? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. see post 7 by bpilgrim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mich Otter (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Thanks, a site in Uruguay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
951-Riverside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
33. Why are thses morons using their own domain anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Because mostly they're spoofed IP's not originating from DOD that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Then why are the "spoofing" only after visiting dem sites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 06:01 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Considering that the gov't can get into the pipeline and track from there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. Hey, aren't all conspiracy theories created equal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim3775 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
34. Whats new? I guess nobody here uses peerguardian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 04:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Peerguardian is junk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Yes you will... IP does leave a trace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim3775 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Of course it's not 100% protection, but that doesn't mean it's junk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. OK, just installed it, it looks interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Well, it's kind of fun, but it's crashed 4 times since I installed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. It's what I use. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tlsmith1963 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
58. It's Only For Mac Users |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim3775 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:44 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. It's not only for mac users, here is a link to the windows version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mich Otter (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
39. I was just probed by "http://fopss.ciad.mx/" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
52. This just in about NSA and "cookies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 07:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Richard Smith doesn't seem terribly excited about NSA site cookies and for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMIC (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
55. I have Norton Internet Security... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
56. I wonder who RackForce in Ohio is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dying Eagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
57. Call your Rep.or Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kittenpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-28-05 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
61. Which port numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 01:12 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Thanks all for the infos. I sure don't want to see any "dark" car(s) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 05:20 AM Response to Original message |
64. Just looked into my Firewall summary and found them and 2 other DOD pings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
67. I am just about to fire up a brand new computer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 01:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. I installed Sygate Personal Firewall 5.6 before Symamtec took |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
68. Is it really the DoD? Or is it some spam... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
69. She-it-that address is right down the street from me.I thought it was DCSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-29-05 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
72. Does anyone know all IP ranges from DOD, CIA and NSA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC