Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intellectual Roots of Neo-conservative Thinking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:33 PM
Original message
Intellectual Roots of Neo-conservative Thinking
By Khurram Husain (*)



They were thoughtful men, intelligent and attentive to detail. They eschewed the blare and chaos of politics, preferring to work silently through collegial persuasion and networked access to important offices. They were analysts at the RAND corporation and their job was to “think the unthinkable.” They were the brains behind the armored brawn of the most powerful war machine the world had ever known.

snip

By the first Bush administration, Wolfowitz was working for Richard Cheney, the Secretary of Defense. In May 1990 he delivered a briefing for Cheney recommending that the US take steps to ensure its strategic dominance of the world for the foreseeable future. He was then assigned as Director, Defense Planning Board of the Pentagon and tasked with writing up the next Defense Planning Guidance paper recommending where America’s military priorities ought to be in the post-Cold war world.

Wolfowitz wrote the DPG 1992 paper and sparked a storm of controversy immediately. The paper was leaked to the New York Times and drew sustained criticism until Cheney had to clarify that it was merely an exercise and not a statement of official policy.

What Wolfowitz produced in that document was nothing less than a blueprint for America to dominate the world. He argued that after the defeat of the USSR, the next main challengers to American power will emerge on a regional stage, and America must prepare to confront them. This will involve disarming all but a handful of countries of all weapons of mass destruction, and setting an aggressive confrontational posture to militarily dominate those regions where America has any vital interests, whether political or military.

The DPG 1992 was buried when the Bush administration lost the election. Wolfowitz and his ilk were out of a job but used their time well to do their homework. He accepted a job as Dean at Johns Hopkins university and maintained contact with his empire builder friends. They wrote regularly in the Weekly Standard, the right wing organ where many of the ideas that we are seeing put into practice were discussed throughout the 1990s.

more: http://www.jahrbuch2003.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Weltmacht/American_Dreams/american_dreams.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Original neocons were Trotskyists
sprung from the swamp of Leo Strauss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True. Maybe the article is concentrating on the military angle...
Rather than the philosophical.

Can't ignore Strauss though, especially his valuation of the myth of good vs. evil and the masses need for that before submitting entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. article comes from the military think tanks angle
and shows how their trajectory ended up in the political neocon movemement with wolfy as the key crossover guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. they can crawl back into that swamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. i think we may be forced to bury them there
I don't think they're going to go willingly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think there are a couple of different threads
But also the term Neo-Conservative has broadened to the point where it has a lot less meaning than it used to.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. agreed they are two threads
but the neocons were hard core Trotskyists disappointed that they couldn't get a foot hold in the dem party and switched because they felt the repub party would be easier to maniplulate into following their radical extremist agenda. Looks like they were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. True.
I didn't really get it until watching http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/3755686.stm">The Power of Nightmares.

Watch online http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares">here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. They were thoughtful men, intelligent and attentive to detail.
Ummm I would beg to differ as Iraq and Katrina has proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Neoconservatives....
and the PNAC are lost on many people. The word needs to be spread about these lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Here's a question.
Do you think they believe in the Bill of Rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No.....
How could they. It seems to me that they have the philosophy of the ends justifying the means. In their quest for global supremacy they are destroying all they seek to protect. To believe in something is to hold it dear, not sacrifice it so carelessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. neocrims believe in imposing order on to chaos
But chaos remains the universe's complex plural prescience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC