Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If this was intentional, will a restriction of general aviation be next?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:01 PM
Original message
If this was intentional, will a restriction of general aviation be next?
I have wondered at times if the chimp and DHS will see fit to reign in general aviation at some point. It wouldn't be too difficult to use the common Cessna to deliver anthrax over a football game or other public event.

Just speculating here, but it's not overly implausible, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to know more about small aircraft now
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 03:04 PM by DireStrike
Who owns them? How many are there? What restrictions are there on flying?

...How come the FAA doesn't seem to have any idea what's going on when they crash into buildings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't this just happen?
about an hour and a half ago or thereabouts?

What is the FAA supposed to be able to release to the public to appease you an hour and a half after this kind of tragedy?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I dunno. I have no idea what kind of info the FAA keeps for this stuff.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. My husband is a partner in a small aircraft, at our local airport
He can fly wherever and whenever he wants. Of course he is licensed by the FAA and needs an Instrument Rating (IFR) to fly in certain conditions. And there are often flight restrictions (permanent ones in certain areas like over military bases, and temporary ones like when Bush is flyin' around), but pilots are responsible for knowing what those are and staying out of those areas.

We had a guy fly way too low over a pier and a beach here a couple years ago, scared the heck out of people. His tail # was noted and he had his license yanked.

Regarding this accident today, if the guy was flying IFR, he would have had to file and IFR Flight Plan and would have had what they call "Flight Following" where he is being watched on someone's radar, to make sure he's not in the path of any other planes. It will be interesting to see what the deal was here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, it will.
Good to hear somebody who sort-of knows this stuff is unsure what the deal was. Makes me feel less stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. There's only speculation at this point...
My brother who lives in Manhattan says its gray and drizzly there but the visibility is good, he can see the Empire State Bldg from his office and it's a few miles away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. i for one hope not to feed into the big panic spiral the GOP hopes for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No panic here
Only stating a question I've had since 9/11: why did the feds (try to) make it more difficult to enact an act of terrorism only from commercial aircraft, while leaving small planes completely out of the equation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. how, in a 'post 9-11 world', does a plane of any size ...
...get that close to a building in NYC...deliberate or not, I guess it's a good thing all those Homeland Security dollars went to protect petting zoos across the American midwest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. There's probably no way short of grounding the general aviation
fleet to prevent this kind of thing, accident or intentional. Which would be a stupid move. You could probably do much more damage by stealing a tanker truck of gasoline and ramming something than any general aviation plane could do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Then where does it end?
Do we stop the mail? Farming? Water treatment? There are many ways to deliver a terrorist attack. I'm not going to live my life in fear bcause of a few schmoe's. What are the odds of me being killed in a terror attack on US soil? Probably more than me being hit by lightning, or a rogue comet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC