|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:27 AM Original message |
Scientific empirical evidence now available to prove that supply side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. It was never about prosperity for society. It was a transfer of wealth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I agree. They don't have any concern for most people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Vs. a transfer of wealth every generation..from the lucky to the unlucky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-17-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Precisely. They sold supply side by saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
2. Just another Repug lie: the proof has always been in the pungent pudding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why? Because idiots think it's got a good beat and they can dance to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. nobody talks about supply side anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Same thing, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. not exactly. Supply side theory said that tax cuts would spur economic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Agree and here's a small rant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-17-06 12:52 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. no, it was $300 or $600 for a couple, but there was no payback |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Working in the short run. I wonder if that is true anymore? Today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. Supply Side economics goes back to Reagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Supply side goes back to the Dutch in the late 1500's- early 1600's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Any economic system... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 12:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Nice analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Wonderful analogy but I would add |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. Did anyone hear Lou Dobbs on Bill Maher: 10 US states that RAISED minimum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Of course! It's the the theory that many people with extra money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I think it went something like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. I just sent it out to my mailing list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. This won't be accepted easily by DUers opposed to tax increases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. Coming from Sachs who needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. You also have to wonder if more middle class money stays |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 10:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. The numbers have been in, on Globalism for 400+ yrs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-17-06 06:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Yeah, stupid aren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Obrigado! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-16-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
24. The fact that this is not considered a truism in the Anglo-Saxon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-17-06 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. Sorry I can't give this another vote but thanks for the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC