Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge clears Bully game release

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 02:08 PM
Original message
Judge clears Bully game release
A follow up to this thread

A US judge has rejected attempts to ban videogame Bully in Florida, after complaints it was a "public nuisance".

Judge Ronald Friedman said that violence in the school-based game did not mean it was a nuisance.

The attempt to ban the title was made by lawyer Jack Thompson, a well-known campaigner against what he believes are violent video games.

...

The BBC News website was shown an unfinished copy of the game. In it, the main character has to defend himself from school bullies as well as form alliances with different cliques in the school.

Tackling the bullies and stopping them from picking on other children is a key feature of the game.


The full article is available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6054262.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. By the way, this would've been "prior restraint", big 1st amendment no-no
The judge would've been on EXTREMELY thin legal/constitutional grounds if he had attempted to pre-emptively halt publication of the game. Even the FCC runs like hell from any whiff of that (which annoys networks to no end because the FCC won't say at all if a particular show or scene will run foul of its standards before the show airs, and after conservative groups get a chance to send enough complaints to let them know what's politically advantageous for Republicans to have fines levied upon).

So it's a laugher that even so, the judge found the content to be completely consistent with community standards. In other words, it's not the game, it's us. We suck too much for the game to come in beneath our collective standards. That gives Thompson no legal ground to stand on whatsoever, even after publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC