|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:50 AM Original message |
Poll question: Do You Think Nancy Pelosi Is Correct About Opposing Impeachment For Bu$h |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Some context, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. A couple weeks ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uben (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
47. Talk about impeachment now and we won't get control of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmosh42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:54 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drifter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:36 AM Response to Reply #47 |
65. Exactly ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #47 |
88. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
3. From A Practical Point Of View It's Futile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. uh huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. We Will Have A Slim Majority In The House With Thirty Five Or So Blue Dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
103. Even if we get to 218 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #103 |
139. Uh yea? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stella (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 06:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
149. is being realistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. There might not be enough time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:03 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:07 AM Original message |
Clinton Wasn't Convicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
23. He hadn't demolished the Constitution, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
exlrrp (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
25. We need 2/3 of the Senate to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:14 AM Response to Reply #25 |
73. Majority of House to impeach; 2/3 of Senate to convict. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Nixon had won by a landslide, and had to resign to escape. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:15 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Not Wimp... A Realist... If My Politics Were Faith Based I'd Be A Pug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Didn't say he WOULD be, now did I? The opinions asked are OURS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:19 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Do I Think Bu$h Should Be Impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:20 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. He resigned when it was clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
119. What I said. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:28 AM Response to Reply #26 |
41. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
141. The difference is the kind of Republicans that existed in 1974. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
34. Doesn't it require 2/3 of the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
67. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
91. I hope I never have to share a foxhole with anyone having such a view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #91 |
98. I bet you would be kicking yourself if she took your advice and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:38 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Not at all. See ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:09 PM Response to Reply #91 |
134. I Work For Democratic Candidates And Give Them My Hard Earned Money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. If Bush is impeached - then we have Cheney....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I honestly believe that is the only reason no one has shot at bu$h |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I see both of them going down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Agnew Resigned Before Nixon Resigned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
76. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #76 |
106. Agnew would have had to have been blind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Impeachment proceedings will block him very nicely. Not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:57 AM Response to Original message |
7. She is until Nov. 8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I voted no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
68. Agreed. Plenty of time to discuss impeachment after the elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greeneyedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
110. EXACTLY. she never said "never". in pol-speak, it's still a possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
113. Precisely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Janice325 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
12. I voted "No," but will the bastard be able to keep doing his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. No but a qualified no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernBelle82 (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
18. I'm really mixed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
89. Hi SouthernBelle82!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
exlrrp (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
19. Not unles we win the Senate AND House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:14 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. There's A Reason There's Never Been A Successful Impeachment In American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:19 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. A Nixonian resignation works for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:24 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Nixon Resigned Because He Didn't Have 34 Votes In the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
120. Hope springs eternal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:58 AM Response to Reply #27 |
70. God your funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:25 AM Response to Reply #70 |
96. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #96 |
132. Yea, I guess that's a REALLY full dance card... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
20. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
22. doesn't it take 2/3 of Senate to impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:51 AM Response to Reply #22 |
50. Impeachment happens in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:44 AM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Thank you for the clarification! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
24. She hasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porkrind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
28. Impeachment is important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
31. She only "says" she's opposed to impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Exactly. All it takes is something like, "I've learned of new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #38 |
101. Exactly & it would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
36. The Dems must show they can make America better, not just impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Not either-or. Where is today's Tom Paine? Let alone Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truthy Nessy (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
42. No to Impeachments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:57 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. bringing this criminal administration to justice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
43. I've changed my opinion on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:06 AM Response to Reply #43 |
56. You're right. First we must prove Dems are better at governing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
44. Impeachment's too good for him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
45. She must swear to protect and defend the Constitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
54. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
46. Of course she's correct...for now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. Agreed. Besides, when oversight hearings begin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
48. Morally reprehensible and politically suicidal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:46 AM Response to Reply #48 |
82. THANK YOU!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #48 |
84. THANK YOU!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keepontruking (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 03:09 AM Response to Reply #48 |
144. impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
49. If you or I, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Preening Fop (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
52. For the Historians, Bust Open The Bloody Bush Secret Society..! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobRossi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
55. 2008 demands NO IMPEACHMENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:16 AM Response to Reply #55 |
74. Defending and protecting the constitution is not a waste of time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #55 |
78. Waste of time for...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A wise Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
57. If we get the House and Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
58. could impeach cheney and bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:22 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Yes, we could. And there's no rush if Bush started to illegally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #61 |
93. Just give us a little truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:15 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. we must be coy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #94 |
117. When the wingers do it, they're defending Democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyclezealot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #117 |
121. agreed/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
59. Ultimately a genuine leader is not of consensus but a molder of consensus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
60. At this point, a facade of bipartisanship is the best route to take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
63. I'd rather dems vote in progessive reform after progressive reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
64. She is not correct. If leaders aren't operating under the law and system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
69. No they should just do it in an afternoon and get it over with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Do it in an afterrnoon for crimes against the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
71. It would be nice if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
75. Impeachment would bring out a lot of truth and information... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
77. Wow. 44% so far think its ok to let a republican administration that has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
79. WHAT??!! As many DUer's say "should not impeach" as the NATION??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:50 AM Response to Reply #79 |
85. I can't think of anything that lowers my respect for DUers as much as this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:46 AM Response to Reply #85 |
102. actually, the inability of some DUers to discern differences in the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
80. From her 60 Minutes interview, I have an idea of what she is planning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
81. It's all a mute point right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
83. First order of business is correcting the damage done by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
86. I Voted "Yes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
87. I want Bush impeached, but I think Pelosi is taking the correct stance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
90. I'm fine with it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
92. If voters insist, Congress will insist, and Pelosi will back down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
95. If you don't get impeached for lying the Nation into war ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
97. We disregard all law if we don't impeach him and his administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:41 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. in theory, you may be right. In practice, impeachment is a political act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #100 |
104. "I cannot agree to destroy the harmonious working of the Constitution..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
105. Yes, unless there is a really good new reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
107. No Amnesty! A Banana Republic of Dems who would violate their sworn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
108. Yes and No. At the minimum, you'd have to have investigations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
109. It's congress duty to put things right again. It's their duty to repair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
111. She's not opposed to impeachment. She has said "we'll see where the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
112. I vote yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
114. They need to be charged with their crimes, put on trial and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
115. If we can't hold him accountable for what he's done then as a country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dragonbreathp9d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
116. is there a HELL NO option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
118. I think a more pertinent questinon would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
122. I hope she plans to impeach Bushler no matter what she says publicly right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
123. Hard one - voted no though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Her first priority is supeona power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #124 |
127. "She is under no obligation to announce it now" - agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
125. I think that whether or not she intends to impeach the president, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:21 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. "then we will have no choice but to impeach the president" EXACTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
126. I prefer that Bush be exposed for ALL illegal White House deeds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
128. They will impeach Bush when the people of this country are behind it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
130. I can remember a time NOT ONE person on DU would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 06:44 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:00 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. So can I...This board has changed....looks like we have a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. It might have been worthwhile two years ago, but at this point, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. It's not about fucking politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. I'm afraid he may walk free from an impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Lack of action implies tacit approval. We need to document his crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #136 |
143. He didn't deserve to be inaugurated either, but he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
140. If it's ok for Republicans to lie about their true intentions, I'll cut Ms. Pelosi some slack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-23-06 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
142. What's the point of taking the House if they're not going to hold Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
145. Another way to ask it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
146. absolutely not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 04:27 AM Response to Original message |
147. I understand the strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stella (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
148. Pelosi is serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
150. I like Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
151. It doesn't hurt for her to say that. It's just her opinion. She may not be the Speaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
152. There is no chance in hell he'll be impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC