|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:06 AM Original message |
Okay folks. Justice Stevens is reportedly "very ill"... He is 86. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. I missed the reports of him being ill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. oh, boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah a link would be nice..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. All there is is a DU thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. A DUer posted at 11:56pm that Justice Stevens was very ill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. Didn't a justice show up sick just before the election 2 years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Counciltucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. Hang in there until January 3, Justice Stevens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
7. Puts a new importance on taking control of the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'm beginning to think it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. It was posted at 11:56pm, though. Not a whole day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. It was posted yesterday at 11:59 AM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Rumor or not, he will not be entering "Dancing with the Stars" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
8. If we take the Senate, we'll have approval power of any appointment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Well, yeah, we have to vote for all democrats. But more than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:49 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I think they will, because they'll know they can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. "death of America for the next 20-30 years" -- good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vexatious Ape (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. What if the Talibangelicals smell blood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
13. Another W appointee would mean sending our country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yes, I believe this election is the very last chance for the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
18. Impeachment is job one! ... K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
20. Scalia's a fat pig- he may exit early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Crispie Creampuffs ...mmmm oink oink oink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 02:56 AM Response to Original message |
21. DINOs will roll over for BshCo again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. It has nothing to do with 'rolling over'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Not true... They could filibuster but they won't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. Doesn't this rumor go around every election cycle? NT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
24. If we don't contol the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
27. I wonder if the Busheviks took Ann Coulter's advice about his creme brulee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-28-06 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
28. The Corporate Christians will be praying for his death.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC