Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has our government ever formally admitted being wrong for supporting Iraq in the 80's?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:15 AM
Original message
Has our government ever formally admitted being wrong for supporting Iraq in the 80's?
Like some kind of a formal admission or apology that the US should not have supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980's? has that ever happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Was it wrong?
Although, letting the area subdivide earlier would have been okay, I guess. Saddam had a secular government in the middle east ..... He kept Iran busy fighting him. Wasn't that a win-win for us? The oil we wanted flowed.

What would have been right, in your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Neutrality
The US does not have to take sides on everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nice theory.
Still, they have all that oil.

It also assumes that all other oil-loving governments practice neutrality. Which is to laugh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dunno - but selling arms to both sides simultaneously
seems wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. But very neutral. THAT's what neutrality is.
Which side did you want us to sell arms to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. neither?
seriously our whole policy in the Middle East has been very messed up for a very long time. I think the nuetrality of not being involved might have been a better neutrality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Is it your belief that if we don't sell them weapons, they won't buy weapons?
Because that is not reality-based thinking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why?
At the time, the empire required it. That's all that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC