Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No fast U.S. shift on Iraq if Democrats win - Dean...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:15 PM
Original message
No fast U.S. shift on Iraq if Democrats win - Dean...
'WASHINGTON, Oct 29 (Reuters) - Even if Democrats win control of Congress in elections next week, an immediate change of course in Iraq policy is unlikely, the party's chairman said on Sunday.

Countering Republican campaign charges that Democrats would "cut and run" from Iraq, chairman Howard Dean said the party did not believe there should be a sudden pullout of all U.S. troops.

"The president will still be in charge of foreign policy and the military...I don't imagine we're going to be able to force the president to reverse his course," he told the CBS "Face the Nation" program.' http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N29286537.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. How you can end a war from Congress is beyond me
You can hold hearings, pound the table, subpoena documents, hold more hearings, hold press conferences that blow a lot of hot air, but I am not aware of a time when Congress ever actually ended a war with its actual powers under the Constitution.

The one with the real power to end the war is the President of the United States who could end it with the stroke of a pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Congress can withdraw the authorization, which gives the president...
...90 days to either obtain a congressional declaration of war or end hostilities-- or precipitate a constitutional crisis, of course. More to the point, congress can suspend the appropriations for the war-- even the threat of that, if credible, will bring the executive to its knees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. piss on that-- anyone who doesn't work to get us out of Iraq...
...will never have my support again, no matter what letter they put after their name. I GUARANTEE that if dems take control of congress and don't put an end to the quagmire in Iraq before 2008, or at least work very damned diligently to do so, MANY folks on the left will abandon the dems in 2008. Now is not the time for the dems to prove Nader right. If dems win, they need to bust ass undoing the damage the Bush administration has done to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC