|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:49 AM Original message |
Webb (VA), McCaskill (MO) and Tester (MT) -- I think we did it, folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Only 74% of the precincts are in in MO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monty_ (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Tester's lead is shrinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Hard to figure that state ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Now 80%, and Claire is holding on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. You think we got MO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think CNN reported that she went up by like 1200 with 74% reporting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. jesus christ. She's down ***50,000***. Can't anyone read? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FubarFly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. CNN had it at 48-48 with 74% reporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:52 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. one thing they keep saying in MO is that the missing precincts are very Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. yes thats true - KC and st louis county still left nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SavageDem (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. That's what I'm wondering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. Early victor parties are unnecessary. Why not wait for the real thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 12:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I will wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
15. Don't count your eggs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
16. It wouldn't be 51...2 indies...I think it's 50... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. The two indies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
17. Webb said the votes are in - we won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SavageDem (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-08-06 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
18. Kansas City County just came in - 51,000 to the plus for McCaskill! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC