|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 08:59 PM Original message |
Dear Skinner: Please revise AZ-05, Mitchell hasn't yet won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. No we should not revise...did the GOP revise when Bush "won" 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. The election thread above specifically prohibits "partial results". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. On the contrary--CNN has 100% in, and Mitchell's the clear winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Check this out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. CNN has been wrong before, should we just take their word for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Yeah, I don't understand this half-assed stupidity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. There aren't 100K votes, but there are a LOT of early, uncounted votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. A Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. shhhhh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-09-06 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Aw, shit, I thought that was a done deal.... NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC