|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:44 AM Original message |
Name 67 Senators who would vote to remove Bush* from office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. Feingold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. not at the moment he wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeybabe125 (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. lol... Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. Once the truth comes out, there might be more than that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
5. It's too soon to do that. You really have to wait for hearings and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. This is a thoughtful and compelling opposing response; thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Name just one who will stand up for the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. But we haven't shown the American people anything by merely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. We don't need to convict him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 04:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. I disagree. A good prosecutor doesn't try a case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
40. so when he's acquitted, you think that will be a good thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Whether he is convicted or not....the Senators will need to answer to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 04:45 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. If investigations unearth information that has Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Of course we don't. We should, rightfully, have "0" votes now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. maybe we can get the repuke senators on board if someone blows chimpy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. That's what I was thinking...and no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. come on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I have a very "delicate system" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
8. Kennedy, Boxer, Rockefeller, Reid, Byrd, Biden, Webb, Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FyurFly (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Seconding Webb! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
37. Scratch Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 11:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
41. at this point there is no reason to think any of them would vote to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. Senator Les Wynan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
15. Depends on the evidence presented by the House Managers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. And one Republican Congressman, Bill Cohen, voted the bill out of committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. The list will keep growing as the evidence mounts. Bush has destroyed the Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:15 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I think they'd impeach him all by themselves today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Once again, he is blaming others instead of taking responsibilty for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
18. Where are we related to the Nixon admin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 03:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Well stated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 04:11 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Nicely written. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
19. Not a fair question. There weren't any until Nixon was compelled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
20. Bernie Sander! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
26. let the public see the lies, and 90 senators will vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. Right now there aren't 67--we would need investigations and then maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. ALL of them would once the corruption has been exposed to THE PEOPLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJ Democrats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
33. Unfortanly there aren't 67 but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
34. Good point. It's 30, tops. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. Most of them once public opinion puts pressure on them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zyguh (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
38. If you all just settle down and let the investigations take there course I can name 100 of em..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
39. After they hear the evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
43. When the impeachment process revealed the guilt of crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC