Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repeat. It was a mandate. Not a single Democratic incumbent lost.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:43 PM
Original message
Repeat. It was a mandate. Not a single Democratic incumbent lost.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/mashekblog/archive/061110/just_an_electoral_blip_i_dont.htm

Just an Electoral Blip? I Don't Think So

<snip>

Republicans don't want to talk either about the close Senate elections in 2002 in Missouri and Minnesota, which barely delivered Senate control to the GOP. Both Sens. Jim Talent, now going home, and Norm Coleman, who shouldn't be taking out any long-term loans in Washington, squeaked through.

So let's put this narrow margin myth to rest. Conservatives lost.

No one can argue that conservatism is dead. That is another matter entirely. The movement could come back in two years if it gets its act together and Democrats fail to meet their mandate.

Repeat. It was a mandate. Not a single Democratic incumbent lost. Indeed, history was made, as not a single House, Senate, or gubernatorial seat now held by the Democrats was lost. Are you listening?

by John W. Mashek

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Precisely right
A complete mandate to move away from abject failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Much more than that.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 12:53 PM by longship
It wasn't just incumbent Democrats. Republicans didn't even pick up any open seats.

Democrats have a mandate because they not only swept into power, the election was a total shut-out of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeggieTart Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They did--those left by retiring Republicans.
Not a single blue seat turned red. I don't know how many Dems retired besides Sarbanes and Dayton (I think), but both were picked up by other Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. An Across The Board Ass Whuping.
When **- (Liar, Texas) said that the individual races were close - he was lying. We kicked ass. Every region except the fundaloon south went blue big time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. but how much was pro-Democrat as opposed to anti-Republican? . . .
a lot of people I spoke with before the election said that they just wanted the Republicans out of there, and didn't much care who the Democrats running against them were . . .

rather than a mandate, the voters have given the Dems an opportunity . . . an opportunity to demonstrate that we can govern effectively and solve problems . . .

if we don't do that, our new majority may be short-lived . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. 8 house seats are still in dispute including that of my friend & current Rep., John Barrow (GA -12)
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 12:58 PM by CottonBear
Eight House Races Still Without Winners
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: November 10, 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Eight House races remain without winners after Tuesday's election, with Republican incumbents in tight contests to keep their seats and state officials not rushing to end the dispute.

Rep. Deborah Pryce, a member of the House Republican leadership, is ahead in her central Ohio race by 3,536 votes. In the Columbus, Ohio-area, elections officials are delaying the count of more than 9,000 provisional ballots by one day so it doesn't disrupt the much-vaulted Ohio State-Michigan football game on Nov. 18.

Elections officials in that district will start counting Nov. 19.

Ohio Republican Rep. Jean Schmidt, who called Democratic Rep. John Murtha a coward, is ahead of her challenger by 2,862 votes. Rep. Barbara Cubin, who threatened to slap her wheelchair-bound Libertarian opponent after a debate, is ahead by fewer than a thousand votes in her Wyoming contest.

Of the eight uncalled races, only one -- Joe Courtney's challenge to Republican Rep. Rob Simmons in Connecticut -- gives a Democratic challenger the lead. In that race, Courtney is ahead by a scant 167 votes. Almost a quarter of a million votes were cast....

***

Other races that remain undecided include North Carolina Rep. Robin Hayes' campaign against Larry Kissell, separated by 449 votes; and New Mexico Rep. Heather Wilson's race, where Democrat Patricia Madrid trails by about 1,600 votes.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-House-Races-Unres...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2608294&mesg_id=2608294


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eviltwin2525 Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. aggregate totals, anyone?
Does anyone have the aggregate total national vote? By this I mean how many total US House votes, nationally, went to Dems vs Pubs. It doesn't decide anything, but it is the one thing we ALL got to vote on, and I'm thinking it's pretty substantial -- perhaps "mandate-sized." If nobody has that number, we can do it the hard way and start adding up all 435 districts. And, yes, retaining ALL the seats we held and picking up -- what is it? twenty-eight? thirty-two? whatever -- that DOES constitute a mandate, by itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. A mandate for competent government and accountability
It was anti-incompetence and government over-reaching. The dems need to avoid arrogance and govern competently and effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sabato: Something which has Never Happened Before in US History?
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 01:16 PM by Leopolds Ghost
He predicted this & said it had never happened before to his knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC