|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:34 PM Original message |
Do we really want to DESTROY the Republican party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is in reference to what point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. What we have now is NOT the Republican party. It's the party of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. I have tried to convince my retired Republican friend of this for years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 03:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. yes, and to that I say, "blind faith in failed policy is not patriotism" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. The neocons and fundamentalist religious-type have hijacked and destroyed the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnneD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sure. Why not the Dems and the Greens? That'd be more in line... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Right on the mark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Help them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Book Lover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. While we have what amounts to a two-party system, there are many more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. More, more, more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. What we need to destroy is their desire for one-party totalitarian control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. I want a genuine conservative party (no matter how much I might disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. We already have two "conservative" parties, how many do you think we need? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I have heard in Europe that they do view our liberals as being conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. If you want to test it try this. The next time you get into a conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. My head won't explode... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Yeah, but you're one of those egghead elite libruls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Well, yeah. I s'pose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
48. Hear, hear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. The political organization you refer to as the Republicican party is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. I would like to see a moderate repug party...and a liberal dem party.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. I want the republican party to change, want enough people to say "wait" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
14. I don't want to destroy the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badgerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. We need at least two parties because we're only human. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. I want to destroy the 2 party system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhollyHeretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I agree. We need more than two legitimate parties in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Oh I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. That's a good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Absolutely. The two party system results in both parties being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. I want them to be 100% HONEST and ETHICAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yes destroy the Grand Oil Party and the we can give the Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. I don't think we really have the power to destroy them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes. Kinda Like The Parable Of The Scorpion And The Frog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ferret Annica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. don't destroy them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
36. How about shifting it away from the far right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
38. Make no mistake...THEY WANT TO DESTROY US and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
41. We destroyed the Nazis. Same thing n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
42. After what they did to us? What goes around comes around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
43. Why yes, yes I do. Can't find any redeeming features in it, myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peanutbrittle (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
44. They have been in self destructive mode for 12 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zyguh (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
45. YES....I want to actually destroy the Republican party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeblue (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
46. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
47. YES. We do. They are BAD for this country and have proved that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
49. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
50. What goes up, must come down! They'll destroy on their own! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC