|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:36 PM Original message |
Each State weigh in: Will your senator (s) vote to impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Feingold has said he'd rather censure and IMO Kohl wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalArkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Arkansas.. Are you kidding, they are Repubs at heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. Kansas... no and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenbriar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 12:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
59. no and no for kansas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. VA: at best a one-one split, probably two against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. no way NH- Gregg, Sununu would ever consider it- (imo) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Gregg-nope.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. You're right about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yeah, Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. Mississippi - trent lott fucking with bush - wow!! Maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. So far: 3 votes to impeach. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Byrd and Rockefeller. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. 5 votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. OR: 1 yes, 1 no n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncrainbowgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. BWAHAHA. Oh- Sorry- had to laugh for a second- I'm in NC. That would be a big NO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. California : 1Boxer will 1 Feinstein maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
57. No way Fein$tein votes to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. My state elected 2 Bushbots. No help from them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durtee librul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. I think the 2/3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. Depends what the evidence is and what their constituents clamor for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. True. Given that, WA 1 yes, 1 probably no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Longhorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. Texas -- need I say it? No. :( nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 03:36 AM Response to Reply #18 |
61. TX will vote to canonize. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. Not without impeachment hearings first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Landrieu - yes (when the facts are out & the public is outraged)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
53. My state's lack of anger at President Dumbfuck for Katrina disappoints me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. I totally agree with you on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Town Jake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. Oklahoma: Inhofe & Coburn. Need I say more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. Senators don't vote to impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
24. Not to get too technical, but the House votes to impeach .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Of course you're right. The senate does make the judgement, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Again, senators don't impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Not to impeach - to remove from office (i.e. convict). n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Clinton was impeached by the House. Senate acquittal did not negate that action. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Yes. Yes. Yes. Got it. I was WRONG! WRONG! I tell you! Kill me now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. It depends on the charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
28. repuke allard: NO, worthless DINO salazar NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
29. Forget impeachment for a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
30. No way in hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
31. Illinois (yes) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
32. WA: Patty Murray, maybe. Maria Cantwell (Dino) no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. This is a bullshit question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
60. I disagree -- no investigation required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
35. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
37. The Senate doesn't impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. 12 votes so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. 12 votes where? For what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
39. CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
40. CO -- kidding me? Salazar? He's probably invited to Blight House dinner this week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
43. WA to convict -no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Bloode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
44. I have Libby Dole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
45. They All Will Vote to Impeach When the EVIDENCE Has Been Presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
47. Ask this question again in six months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
48. First things first: to impeach Rep. Zach Wamp (R), bush** rubberstamp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
49. Florida: Martinez, No, and Nelson, probably not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jed Dilligan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
50. Depends entirely on the investigations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. coburn and inhofe worship bush*'s ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
52. WI: Feingold hell yes, Kohl maybe. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. Despite the fact that the senate doesn't vote to impeach, AZ Sens will back Bush any way possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-11-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. So far: Only 13 votes here. Are all states reporting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
58. Senators don't impeach they convict. Representatives impeach. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC