Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bipartisanship for the Bush Administration STILL means what it meant post-9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:46 AM
Original message
Bipartisanship for the Bush Administration STILL means what it meant post-9/11
Where it was "We will be bipartisan, which means Democrats will vote how WE want them to vote."

"The Bush administration said on Sunday that it would strenuously oppose one of the Democrats’ top priorities for the new Congress: legislation authorizing the government to negotiate with drug companies to secure lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries.

In an interview, Michael O. Leavitt, the secretary of health and human services, said he saw no prospect of compromise on the issue."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2611696&mesg_id=2611696
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. all ready then. exactly why is negotiation a bad thing?
I read Leavitt's explanation and I get a pain in my head.

As Barney Frank explained it to an audience last week, it makes no sense. Medicaid allows the government to negotiate drug prices. So a person on Medicaid who moves over to Medicare, and takes the same drug, in the same dosage, now pays more for it b/c the government cannot negotiate prices?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Getcha one way bipartisanship right here.
Of course they meant Democrats should do what they are told. No sooner had they uttered all those work together play nice words then they were renominating Bolton, pushing domestic wiretapping, and announcing that they were going to oppose core Democratic policy initiatives.

Let them obstruct in the Senate and veto at the White House. The people are fed up with their bullshit and this will not sit well with them at all.

If we have to wait two years to completely clean house and start getting things done, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC