Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vengeance is Mom's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:41 PM
Original message
Vengeance is Mom's
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 08:48 PM by madmusic
News: Meet Dianne Clements, the soccer mom who has done as much as anyone to ensure that Texas' killing chamber remains the nation's busiest.

snip

Clements was once just another Houston soccer mom, working an office job and raising two teens—Krista and Zachary—with her husband, Woody. “It was a very typical suburban life,” she says. “Our routine was work, school, baseball.” That routine was blown apart one afternoon in August 1991. Zachary, 13 at the time, was playing with a couple of neighbors’ kids about his age, when one of the boys grabbed his stepfather’s shotgun and pulled the trigger. The blast tore a hole through Zachary’s chest, killing him on the spot.

The police called it a tragic accident, not a crime, and let the matter drop. But Clements couldn’t see it that way. “It was impossible for me to accept that my child had been killed in such a fashion and there was no response, no outrage other than my family’s,” she says. For months, she hounded the district attorney’s office, demanding action. A court finally gave the shooter a year’s probation.

That experience impelled her, and another woman who also felt the system wasn’t doing enough to punish lawbreakers, to found Justice for All. With the moral force of bereft family members and Clements’ tireless energy behind it, JFA evolved into a 4,000-member outfit. Though it remains an all-volunteer organization, it has the ear of many Texas prosecutors and politicians and has helped push through a range of laws that make life harder for criminals. State correctional officials hold the group in such respect that they renamed a prison after JFA’s other founder. Clements even got an admiring mention in George W. Bush’s autobiography, A Charge to Keep.

more: http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2006/03/vengeance_moms.html


And the article mentions the prison guard union's victim's rights group: "Another group, Crime Victims United of California, helped pass the state’s “Three Strikes and You’re Out” initiative and more recently was in the headlines calling for the execution of Stanley “Tookie” Williams."

It's amazing what one person can do.

Edit union's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. So why the FUCK isn't she working on making it less easy for kids to play
wilth loaded guns?

She's a fucking twisted lunatic.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And holding gun owners responsible for careless access to their
weapons, the fucking twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, I meant that as well. "Fucking twit" is damned accurate.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Her son wasn't even a crime victim.
Lunatic is right. It is twisted to want to help put to death anyone you can because of an accident.

Did she and BushCo feed off of each other? Sure seems like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. But that's the BushCo way, after all. Saudi citizens perpetrate a terrorist act, so
we invade Iraq.

Right out of the bush playbook.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree
I kept reading, thinking I would learn that she lobbies for gun safety or some other law that may have prevented her son's death.

She sounds like a twisted individual indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's terribly sad that what she learned from her son's death was vengeance
against children and the mentally retarded. That's just unhinged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. "A wonderful, wonderful heart" is what they say this vengeful harpy has.
A twisted, hate filled woman is what I would have to think. She is so worried about retribution she advocates for the death of people without concern for the possibility of their innocence or their competence. No, all that matters is that her blood lust be slaked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Where? In a jar on her desk?
Blinded by her own pain, she's become a MONSTER.
She feeds her pain, she's made it her reason for living,
and she spreads it to others like a disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL, from her site: Bring Back Our Balance of Power By Tom DeLay
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 09:25 PM by madmusic
Bring Back Our Balance of Power
By Tom DeLay (R-Sugar Land)

snip

Courts across the country are issuing decisions not based on law or fact, but instead based on specific political agendas. Last year, the Supreme Court struck down a Colorado vote prohibiting preferential treatment for homosexuals. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, "I think it no business of the courts (as opposed to the political branches) to take sides in this culture war... Striking down is an act, not of judicial judgment, but of political will."

When the Supreme Court is busy exercising a political agenda, it sets a poor precedent for federal judges nationwide. Consequently, many of these judges begin to grow drunk on their own power. Why shouldn't the people have the right to impeach these out-of-control judges? After all, our Founding Fathers put impeachment in the Constitution as a tool to keep the judicial branch in check.

Many people in the liberal elite are terrified by this notion. They should be. The liberal agenda in this country has been defeated in election after election, leaving liberals to turn to the courts. There they have been able to impose their will on an unwilling majority. Obviously, equal rights protect those in the minority, but we must not confuse equal rights with equal powers. The minority should not be able to exercise control over the majority.

more, but not worth it: http://www.jfa.net/VOJ/July97.html

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

How do you like it now, MF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. heh heh heh yeah MF'r!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. A bushie*, eh?
Like the bushies who are so found of now saying, "We shouldn't play the blame game, we should just put this all behind us so that we can move forward"??? They are all for law & order/police state until it is one of them or their heros on the wrong side of the law. Hypocrits, every last one of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. 'Do you or do you not require your members to be against the death penalty?' "
The plot thickens and gets rather dramatic:

They described her as if she were a sullen student defying a teacher, facing sideways in her chair, affecting an air of disinterest. As the workshop began, she ate ice from a cup, crunching loudly enough to be heard by all 40 or so in the room.

The woman was Dianne Clements, president of the Houston-based victims' rights group Justice For All. She soon began interrupting the speakers. According to some attendees, these exchanges followed:

Cushing asked Clements to hold her questions until after the presentation. She refused, demanding answers.

"I want you to tell us," Clements angrily insisted, "what are you? Are you an abolitionist group or a victim support group?"

"We're both," replied Bishop.

That answer was unacceptable to Clements. She repeated her line of questioning, then stunned listeners when she told Cushing and Bishop, "You're really a bunch of abolitionists who just happened to have family members killed."

By all indications, there seems to be just one side to the death penalty issue for Clements: You're either for it, or against her.

A compelling read: http://www.houstonpress.com/Issues/2002-10-03/news/feature.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC