ALEXANDRIA, Va. - A Maryland rabbi ensnared in a nationally televised sex sting was sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison Friday for attempting to have sex with a person he believed was a 13-year-old boy.
David A. Kaye, 56, of Rockville, Md., was convicted in September in federal court of enticement and traveling across state lines to engage in illegal sexual conduct.
Most of the evidence came from a televised sting on "Dateline NBC" that was conducted in conjunction with an Internet watchdog group called Perverted Justice.
A Perverted Justice member posing as a 13-year-old boy met Kaye in an online chat room in August 2005, and Kaye solicited sex acts. When Kaye drove to what he thought was the boy's home in Herndon, Va., he was instead confronted by a television reporter and camera crew and admitted he was there for "not something good."
http://www.examiner.com/a-430976~Rabbi_gets_6_5_years_in_prison_after_being_caught_in_sex_sting.html This is far better than having a father come home and catching him with his 13-year-old son. In rage, he might shoot him or something. A jury would probably go light on the father, and in a way, that's understandable. But that would be double hell for his kid.
This whole program still strikes me as sleazy though. If you watched the recent one on last night, you know that the Perverted Justice decoys often repeatedly contact the men after the initial contact and pretend to be "eager for sex," because psychologists told them that was normal. Is it really? Or is it an excuse to borderline entrap? If it is normal, could "To Catch a Predator" help put those ideas in some kid's heads? Some of the chats are weeks or months long, as well. So how long does this eager trolling take before the decoy convinces the man to go to the house? And how many gazelles seek out lions to play with? No, can't believe it's normal at all and anyone who thinks they are really chatting with an eager teen is an idiot. What's more, will this really act as a deterrent? That's how they justify what they are doing. Is "To Catch a Predator" really our knight in shining armor or will "normal" teens "eager" for sex and eager adults become more sly?
The problem with the show is that it is like a Nancy Grace prosecution where only her side of the case is evidence. Like all reality shows, everything that doesn't support ratings is cut. The chats are sealed so we can't know for sure how Perverted Justice goes about doing this. It's like the new child pornography case: secret evidence. We may or not not object if we did knew how these chats come about, and we may think even if it is entrapment, so what, it's worth it to get these guys. We do know that Perverted Justice has a big financial incentive to "catch predators" and for that reason alone could step over the line. Should we care?
My guess is that if these televised stings were after something far more common, say, "To Catch a Cheater" on incomes taxes, the objections would be far and wide. No ratings there, though, so no worries.
Just because these "predators" asked for it, that doesn't mean we have to agree with the process, and I don't like the idea of secret evidence at all. Think Jose Padilla.
EDIT: Padilla