Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KUCINICH: Americans DID NOT VOTE For Iraq Study Group -They Voted For A New Direction-OUT OF IRAQ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:45 PM
Original message
KUCINICH: Americans DID NOT VOTE For Iraq Study Group -They Voted For A New Direction-OUT OF IRAQ
Congressman Dennis Kucinich just said this on the floor of the House of Representatives:

The American public did not vote for the Iraq Study Group. They voted for a new congress and a new direction in Iraq - - out. Many who voted for change will be surprised to learn some who oppose the war will continue to fund it, in the name of supporting the troops in the field.

“We will not abandon the troops in the field,” some solemnly pronounce, while continuing to fund a war that even generals say cannot be won militarily. Well, we have abandoned the troops in the field already. We have abandoned them to lies about why the war was being fought. We have abandoned them to getting shot from all sides. We have left them in a type of hell while we profess a strange love for them by keeping them there.

The money is in the pipeline right now to bring the troops home. $70 billion dollars was appropriated for Iraq on October 1st. The Administration will ask for another $160 billion in the spring. That is a total of $230 billion for the Iraq war. In less than two years the war and the so called defense budget will cost more than $1 trillion. Stop wasting money. Stop wasting lives. Bring the troops home now. Cut off any more funds for the war.

http://www.democrats.com/node/11315
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The man's right on. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. But who will defend Big Oil's drilling contracts???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. How about Blackwell and CACI?
Let them earn some of that money...

This is, at the heart of it, a question of security for workers and facilities of a corporation contracting with the govt, such as it is, of Iraq (or any Iraq-like entity that can control Baghdad).

I am all for letting American firms drill if Iraq wants them to, but I think that at this point, the oil compainies are abusing the American people.

I personally believe that for the good of America that we need to nationalize oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right on Dennis!!!
:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Indeed. We've been studying this mess for three years now,
and we have long since come to the conclusion that we need to fix that mess and perform a strategic withdrawal. Soon. Now would be a good time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. KOOCH!
My conscience vote in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. How seriously can you take a group named after a bunch of sixth graders anyway?


:eyes:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. LOL, that's what I've been thinking...
do they meet after school somewhere.

These guys have SOME NERVE.
We DIDN'T vote for them....

They AREN'T cabinet members.....

Who the *UCK are the IRAQ STUDY GROUP to move in
and just elbow everybody else out of the way.

Crazy World or Carlysle World?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, great statement!
He's right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick t. cakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. k/r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. He continues to voice my stance quite aptly. He's one of few who do.
Kucinich, the CBC, and the Progressive Caucus are the ONLY people who consistently, with very few exceptions, give voice to the values I embrace. Go Kooch!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you!
The truth speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank GOD for Kucinich
He's the only Dem in Congress I trust anymore.

I'm sick to the teeth of people apologizing for the about-face some Dems are doing and saying an exit strategy isn't what the Dems campaigned on. The Dems did so fucking too campaign on coming up with an exit strategy!! And now we've got Reyes calling for MORE troops to be sent!!

Haven't we had enough of the two-faced bullshit lies from the Repugs and why are the Dems emulating them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Reyes made them statements in August as a suggestion to deal.........
with the militia violence that was going on at time. He said today he open for suggestions and basically will follow the majorities wishes(or something like that). Ed Schultz interviewed him today in what seemed like a long interview for Ed. You can listen to for yourself, go to the pod-cast

The Ed Schultz Show
(snip)
To listen to Incoming House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-TX, discuss the Iraq Study Group and plans for the House Intelligence Committee.
http://www.bigeddieradio.com/index.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. But he said the same this week
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 05:38 PM by magellan
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16062351/site/newsweek/site/newsweek

Dec. 5. 2006 - In a surprise twist in the debate over Iraq, Rep. Silvestre Reyes, the soon-to-be chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he wants to see an increase of 20,000 to 30,000 U.S. troops as part of a stepped up effort to “dismantle the militias.”

snip

But in an interview with NEWSWEEK on Tuesday, Reyes pointedly distanced himself from many of his Democratic colleagues who have called for fixed timetables for the withdrawal of U.S. troops. Coming on the eve of tomorrow’s recommendations from the bipartisan Baker-Hamilton commission, Reyes’s comments were immediately cited by some Iraq war analysts as fresh evidence that the intense debate over U.S. policy may be more fluid than many have expected.

“We’re not going to have stability in Iraq until we eliminate those militias, those private armies,” Reyes said. “We have to consider the need for additional troops to be in Iraq, to take out the militias and stabilize Iraq … We certainly can’t leave Iraq and run the risk that it becomes Afghanistan” was before the 2001 invasion by the United States.

...

Additional troops for Iraq is on the table.

on edit: forgot the first bit of the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
41. Msnbc has twisted the context of when he said it
Listen to the interview and stop putting so much stock in a twisted corrupt corporate media. In fact he reputes that report in the interview. The corporate world that msnbc is part of want to gain credibility even if it means being in the long run discreditable. They figure we all forget they were the same corrupt cheerleaders that put us in this debacle in Iraq.

The time is now to listen to what the people from congress really have to say in their own voice and not some interpretation from a spin-mister corporate whore with a specious agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Got it, thank you. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. exactly
everything you said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyForKucinich Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Thank Kucinich for he is god.
Or the closest thing to one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Compared to most others on the Hill, you're right!
I wish the the Dems would support him in another run for the candidacy and that he could win. But there doesn't seem to be any appetite to speak of for consistent, thoughtful, honorable progressives. Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. OK Democrats - PLEASE listen to Kucinich.
He is 100% correct and I am so glad he's speaking out. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Absoultely right, and completely irrelevant
Gates the criminal will be confirmed. Smirk will continue to call us the Democrat Party, and no one of any import will say anything about it. the media will continue to worship him. Not a damned thing has changed despite the election results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I think that it is over for Iraq.
And for the future attack of Iran, I think they have lost the opportunity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yah DAMN RIGHT Dennis!!!!
You tell those idiot Dems who want more troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Smarter evil is still evil. A better managed imperial adventure is still a crime.
bring the troops home now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kucinich: one of the few who NEVER disappoint.
Always on message, never appeasing, just telling the truth.

Bring.Them.Home.NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. They will force negotiations and withdraw - House of Saud wants this mess FIXED.
Bet on it. It would be great to happen right away but that will never happen, so I expect it will be 12-18 months so they save Bushboy's face by not implementing Dem plans like Kerry-Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
threadkillaz Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Since when do we call on the Retirees for fresh ideas?
I thought people retired at 65.

Who ARE these old people to tell us what to do anyways?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. hmmmm. Who ARE you, youngster, to tell us what to do?
"anyways" kind of gives it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
threadkillaz Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Young enough where senility is not an issue.
And if Sandra Day is young enough to be on the ISG, why isnt she still performing her "lifetime" appointment as SCJ?

Instead of ushering in Alito during a Repub prez.

I call BS on this ISG.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick for Dennis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Dennis Kucinich for President!
He was my guy then, and he is still. :thumbsup: :bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. And that's the point: Who just took over the white house? Who?
41's friends? The same people who brought you the Iran Contra Scandal, that's who.

Wonderful. More leaders I didn't vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. And the elephant in the room (no pun intended) is this:
Who let them??

The signs are in front of all our faces.

I fear there will be no change forthcoming, at least not one of lasting consequence.

I fear we've been had, yet again, and if this happens, and the people who did not vote FOR a Democrat but rather AGAINST a Republican look up and find a giant case of "same old same old" sitting on the back porch they will turn a deaf ear next time 'round.

And rightfully so.

They want the killing to stop. NOW.

They want the troops home. NOW.

They want an honest to goodness opposition party. NOW.

They want hearings, and answers, and "what did he know and when did he know it?" NOW.

They will tell you, in no uncertain terms, to take your "inside politics" and "this is how the game is played" rationalization bullshit and shove it.

They are right, and maybe - just maybe - somebody should listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
30. What can I say
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 09:44 PM by fujiyama
He speaks the truth.

It makes some uncomfortable to hear it, but it's nice to hear it all, rather than "but oh, if we leave now it will get worse" bullshit.

It doesn't get any worse than a mass retaliatory ethnic cleansing, which is basically what's going on now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. K & R
Dennis speaks the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
32. Saw Russ Feingold on TV tonight, he said same thing. We need to get out.
This Iraqi Group Crap is cover for Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. What happens if we leave,
and systematic genocide & ethnic cleansing begins happening in Iraq? Or a general begins killing anyone who ever worked w/the Americans? What if it becomes another Bosnia? Should we just stand on the sidelines & let it happen? What should we do if the civil war sparks a regional war w/Turkey & Iran? I want to withdraw from Iraq too, but sometimes it feels like no one wants to really contemplate what happens when we do. Maybe it's too horrible to contemplate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwdeviant Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. And maybe it's not too horrible to contemplate.
The problem is that we don't know what will happen. We do know that doing what we've been doing hasn't stopped the killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. True
And we're inclined to think that it wouldn't be any worse w/the Americans gone. But honestly, it could be much, much, worse. It seems like the US troops are the only thing propping up the Maliki government, and some semblance of order. Once the US troops are gone, real anarchy could begin. Mass reprisals, ethnic cleansing, Islamic fundamentalist thugs wandering the streets & taking over the country. And if real genocide begins, are we just going to sit there & let it happen? We don't know what would happen if the US left, but I think we do know, deep down, that the result probably wouldn't be a good one for the Iraqis. There's no happy ending here. The only question is how much further the US wants to be involved in the tragedy we have created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. Right freakin' On!!!!


Stop funding the war now!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. "Out of Iraq" was not on any ballot ....
While I agree with Kucinich, the truth is more than likely that some did vote the way they did for that exact reason.

Many imo voted the Dems in just to keep shrub from causing any more harm in his remaining two years. Some restraint. It's a fact that he's still in charge, and any knowledgable person can see that the Dems cannot politically refuse troop funding. There is a clear limit to Congress' powers in the Iraq matter.

Some voted out of shame for the scandalous occurrences in the past six years.
I personally think there were dozens - perhaps hundreds - of reasons we prevailed; all of them barely adding up to a slight majority in the big chamber.
"Out of Iraq" was just one of many factors in the final results. The scandals of Abramoff and others "could" have had an equal weight in the final results. We'll never truly know. In that case, perhaps we should place a higher priority on punishing the criminals and remedying ourselves of scandal.
jmo

...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
43. Actually, the time they had a chance, they voted against Kucinich
I don't recall a "Flee Iraq Now" referendum on my ballot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. I do, on mine.
It was the one under Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. And I don't recall a "get us into an immoral war" anywhere on my ballot
Edited on Thu Dec-07-06 12:22 PM by Raster
bush* is a liar, cheat and thief. The Iraq war is nothing but lies and bloodshed.

Brint them home NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. what is your point?
Or are you trying to deny that prior to the midterms, according to all the polls, the majority of Americans indicated that ending the war was a top priority? And when they voted out Republicans, they were voting on the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
45. I voted and all I got was &#@# Shelley Moore Capito
While some of you got Dennis Kucinich, you lucky dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdrichards114 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. A-FUCKING-MEN!!!!
Kucinich has always been a decent congressman who tells it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
49. OUT!! NOW!!!
US Troops OUT OF IRAQ!!

TOTALLY! UNCONDITIONALLY! IMMEDIATELY!!

BUSH/CHENEY/RICE OUT OF OFFICE!!!!!

TOTALLY! UNCONDITIONALLY! IMMEDIATELY!!!

WE LOOOOOOVE YOU, Dennis!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zenturtle Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
51. This Representative speaks my mind
We badly need more leaders with Kucinich's vision and courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC