|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 02:54 PM Original message |
My Pelosi Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. If Pelosi was 100% behind impeachment, what are the odds he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's not her concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Why isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It's her sworn duty to forward matters of presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What if she can't get the impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. What if she can't get health care reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 03:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 09:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
90. What are the odds your child will become President if you educate them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Wow, that's a surprising lack of comprehension. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. You are as wrong as a person can be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. That's Really Funny, Since The Person Is 100% Correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Look, if you're incapable of understanding what the Constitution is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 07:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Methinks You Need To Turn That Pointed Finger Around, With All Due Respect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Do you believe Congress has a sworn duty to remove from office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Of Course Not. To Declare Such Is An Absurdity And A Gross Misinterpretation Of The Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Great, since you're as smart as Kelly, I'll ask the same question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. First, there is no clear distinction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:46 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Wow! That's just fascinating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. SOMEBODY here is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Thank goodness you're arrived. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:23 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. That's Easy. I Don't Mind Teaching You About The Constituion Further. Here Ya Go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Where did they get that power of discretion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. From The Constitution. And This Is Becoming Way Beyond Silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 11:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Me too, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. Only when you make things up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. You're too funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. Interesting as this has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Yes, anybody who read your first post knows this about you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:47 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. But yet everyone who has entered this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Would you just explain one thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. I've explained in great detail, repeatedly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. We're all part of one flock or another. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Oh, it's okay. I'm sure the NSA intercepted it and mixed it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:15 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Well, you know, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #100 |
107. BT, for the answers to your questions, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #80 |
91. There's something called an impeachment clause? Where is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. The impeachment clauses are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Your question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #79 |
156. I love the way people like you have been brainwashed into repeating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #73 |
85. How do they decide? They vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #85 |
97. But you're trying to argue that the clause in question is there to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. No, I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:57 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. Wow, you really shouldn't have brought up the question about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. This is kind of amusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:20 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. Look what you just learned: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. C'mon, BT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. There is no binding legal duty because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. Yes, impeachment, according to James Madison, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #120 |
124. First, you're equivocating on the meaning of "supplement." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. I'm in good company. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. You could well be right about Mason's intentions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:10 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. No, the Framers intended impeachment to be used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #128 |
144. I never contested that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 07:41 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. I haven't said anything about any legally-binding mandates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. Not that it'll do any good, but let me ask again, would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. I already covered the first part. Are you asking for another name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Mr. Turley did not actually claim it was a legal mandate to impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. The oath may or may not be a legal mandate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. So it depends on what the definition is "is" is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. I say the NSA is spying on us because the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. And I say I've never seen such |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. Give me one example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. Go look at your posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. I was right. You really don't know what a fallacy is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:10 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Fallacy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. Turley would either laugh his ass off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. Actually, I didn't say that, but I'll explain what I said again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Nice try: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Nice try: That was not posted in response to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. Whatever, but I've got an idea to settle this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:16 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Call on whomever you like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
63. You Really Don't Know The Answer To This? Ok, I Don't Mind Teaching You. No Problem! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 11:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. All right, let's see your "legitimate Constitutional scholars." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. How DARE You Request A Factual Basis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Let's try applying the logic all over the place! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Deleted message |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. I decided to point out your dishonesty (as if it was necessary). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. Right, just like you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #51 |
68. I didn't ignore anything. As you know, I've pointed the language out, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. Pointed out that you're ignoring that the wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. I don't want you to leave me alone. I love exposing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. Still waiting on those legitimate scholars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Hey, here's your chance to learn what a straw man is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. Yes, let's. Show me your legitimate scholars, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. Oh dear .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. BuyingThyme, I think Pelosi is not fixed in concrete on impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I have to take her word for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. You have to gather the evidence first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Like when the courts said Bush broke the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
43. What courts said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
147. Here's one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Good try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #148 |
154. I see. And where did I imply that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
58. Having a program overturned is not generally considered an impeachable offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
64. I'm not sure what you are talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
149. Maybe you live in a different country than I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
14. Why Are You Twisting Things And Making Things Up? It's Quite Disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 09:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. You don't understand your own Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What A Silly And Projective Statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Another question for you to avoid: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
55. Ah, the "coward place." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
60. That's Up To The Interpretation Of Congress. It's Pretty Straightforward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-20-06 11:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You know who I'll let teach me about the Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. And for you too, genius: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. An impeachable offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
54. An impeachable offense is, legally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. It's not your ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. Please ask somebody to help you with the grammar and English. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Really, what do you think you're proving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I wasn't attacking OM for his grammar, I was attacking him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Only someone as attached to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
71. Now that you've twice proved yourself "pathetic," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. How Silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Again we come back to the word SHALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:56 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. wow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #78 |
92. I know, you're among the sheep who actually believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 07:35 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. This Has Got To Be The Saddest And Silliest Intepretation I've Ever Seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #81 |
93. What interpretation is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #93 |
142. Your Interpretations Of The Impeachment Clauses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. You realize that the word "on" makes that conditional, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
62. Matters Not. Either Way You Were Still Completely Inaccurate In Your Assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
61. You Claim It Third Grade Stuff, Yet You Still Have Failed To Comprehend It Thus Far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
35. The Constitution does not say "Congress shall impeach for treason." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Yes, the Constitution says the president "shall" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. It says no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
40. I think "shall" is indicative; "may," "might," and "should" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. In the Constitution, SHALL is law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. So it seems. On the subject of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 02:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Oh no he wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:01 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Are you kidding? Cicero? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. OK, sounds like fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
88. Except that the Constitution doesn't say that "Congress shall impeach for treason, bribery, or other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
50. Where exactly in the Constitution does it say "Congress shall impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. It doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
65. That is not exactly how it reads. I'm just trying to explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. oh, knock it off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 05:56 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:15 PM Response to Reply #69 |
136. Knock it off. You're insane. And way dead wronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 11:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
86. I'm sure once you're used to being a clown, everyone else looks silly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 08:13 AM Response to Reply #65 |
87. Then you should start out with what it actually say, not what you WANT it to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-21-06 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
77. She's our representative. She'll do what we demand of her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
89. Trying to correct you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #89 |
134. You got the second part right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. Here, read this. I doubt it will help your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:43 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. Here, read this... I just wrote it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. What the heck does that have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 04:00 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. What are they bound to do if not to protect the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. I'm done, BT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-22-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Have a great holiday, Cali! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
150. You are using quotes to represent what Speaker Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Somebody has to explain to you that she didn't really say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. No, someone has to explain to me why they are lying about Speaker Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:20 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. Deleted message |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. Get over yourself. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemeupwhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-26-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
157. I'm going to lock this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC