Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When the US drops a Brigade from the 82nd into Iraq, there's some major shit about to go down,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:33 AM
Original message
When the US drops a Brigade from the 82nd into Iraq, there's some major shit about to go down,
These guys make the National Guard look like Boy Scouts. This doesn't look like a "surge" too me. It looks like a full on assault is about to occur.

http://stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=42411
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've heard speculation that they're going after the Medhi Army...
...the 60,000-strong Medhi Army, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh well, I wish them luck with that one.
Crap, going after a group of 60,000 in their own country.

Wonder how well that one's going to turn out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The numbers aren't scary by themselves.
It's location, location, location.

And Sadr City really sucks as a location to fight in. If it was so easy to crush the place without firebombing it and probably setting the whole city on fire, Saddam would've done it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why does 'Tet' come to mine here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. because the powers to be know nothing of it
Americans are fixing to lose many of sons and daughters mothers and fathers for oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly...
You don't send in our best to maintain peace... You send in our best to attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. "Tet" spelled backward ...
U.S. forces didn't initiate the Tet offensive, just reacted to it. Tet is sort of confusing, very unlike the Viet Cong to coordinate such a large event. Sometimes I think it was orchestrated by the NVA for the purpose of eliminating the Viet Cong who might have competed with the north for post-war dominance. If so, mission accomplished.

It Iraq, it's "us" who are building up to launch an offensive operation of some kind. Not that it will do any good. We can pound the hell out of a city, but as long as the borders are as porous as they are, the opposition will simply re-enforce and rebuild.

If there is any valid purpose to build up, it's to just cover our exodus. Extract ourselves as quickly as possible with minimum loss of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm thinking you're right.
To cover our escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I believe that Bush wants to 'settle' Iraq before he deal with Iran
If I am reading Larry Johnson correctly, then Bush really wants to go after Iran. However, he can't do that while Iraq is so unstable. So, Bush is using this 'surge' idea to go after what he considers the biggest group that is destabilizing Baghdad and drawing in support all over Iraq: Moqtada al Sadr.

This is a massive mistake, as Johnson writes both in this diary at DKos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/12/18/112647/99
and in a post from a solider stationed in Iraq that is on Johnson's blog at:
http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/12/more_from_iraq.html

Bush is, as Sen. Kerry said in his WaPo editorial on Sunday, insane. This will only further inflame the Iraqis and could have devastating results. The Shia could ban together and shut off the supply lines for the US troops currently in country. Then we have tens of thousands of American hostages in Iraq, and we will be unable to get them food, fuel, supplies, reinforcements, etc. This is a catastrophe in waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. It was always an escalation not a surge.
Unless we are about to start lining up Iraqis in the street and shooting them by the hundreds and thousands, escalating the war is not likely to do anything other than result in a prolonged and bloodier defeat. The Iraqis aren't going anywhere, we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yep...
It's the anticipation of violence when Saddam is executed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC