Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No free rides

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 01:06 AM
Original message
No free rides
No Free Ride

Moody's Investors Service rates $47 billion in bonds sold by states and municipalities for toll roads, and liked the idea of privatization well enough in a report on the subject published in September.

For one thing, the report said, leasing the roads to someone else removes the political obstacles to raising tolls. Not raising tolls ``can lead to pressure on financial margins, lower debt service coverage ratios and elevated credit risks,'' according to Moody's.Rating companies like things such as fees and tolls, and especially taxes.

Politicians really hear it when tolls are increased. Most Americans still seem to subscribe to the notion that, at some point, toll roads have been ``paid off,'' and that the toll booths should come down. In reality, of course, there's no such thing as a free ride, except on the federally financed Interstates.

Transfer Risk
Leasing toll roads means transferring operating, maintenance and construction risk. Moody's said it views this in ``a generally positive light,'' so long as governments make sure that the private operators keep up their end of the bargain.


Say goodbye to riding free and say hello to tool booths and more surveillance maybe even checkpoints. Fuckers. I hate the privatize it all greedy pigs.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_mysak&sid=aDmGgJWMlM9E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. privatizing public roads is a whopping load of cr*p, IMO
Edited on Sun Dec-31-06 06:03 AM by ixion
in fact, privatizing public infrastructure, in general, is a bad idea... at least if you happen to be a member of the public.


1) It's unconstitutional, and represents taxation without representation, IMO.

2) It tends to INCREASE corruption, not decrease.

3) It tends to INCREASE the cost of the utility, which is never in the best intrest of the public.

4) It creates legal gray areas, especially where things like roads are concerned.

All in all, just a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC