Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Group: ExxonMobil paid groups to mislead public on global warming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:23 PM
Original message
Group: ExxonMobil paid groups to mislead public on global warming
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 09:24 PM by Fighting Irish
ExxonMobil Corp. gave $16 million to 43 ideological groups between 1998 and 2005 in a coordinated effort to mislead the public by discrediting the science behind global warming, the Union of Concerned Scientists asserted Wednesday.

The report by the science-based nonprofit advocacy group mirrors similar claims by Britain's leading scientific academy. Last September, The Royal Society wrote the oil company asking it to halt support for groups that "misrepresented the science of climate change."

ExxonMobil did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the scientific advocacy group's report.

Many scientists say accumulating carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from tailpipes and smokestacks are warming the atmosphere like a greenhouse, melting Arctic sea ice, alpine glaciers and disturbing the lives of animals and plants.

ExxonMobil lists on its Web site nearly $133 million in 2005 contributions globally, including $6.8 million for "public information and policy research" distributed to more than 140 think-tanks, universities, foundations, associations and other groups. Some of those have publicly disputed the link between greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070103/ap_on_bi_ge/exxonmobil_global_warming&printer=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. An oil company lied to us?
Yikes, what's next? The government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I know one person who bought it whole
a bright young coworker who knows their message by heart, but doesn't know it's a message, he thinks it's his own thoughts on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ya know what I don't get is how they can piss that kind of money away
to hide the truth, just to get their own way. What if all that money was put into some R&D to alleviate the problem to begin with? Stupid greedy, short-sighted fools. Now they pissed away a fortune trying to sway the public, the planet is nearly doomed, and should we survive it's gonna cost them hundreds times that amount in lost profits, revenues, R&D, etc, etc, etc.

Ah, but they have the satisfaction of thinking they pulled another one of on the stupid public and can sing "I Did it My Way". Dumbf*cks :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's like the inheritance tax.
There's a half dozen people in the Wall family that all have billions of dollars, each. They could either pay tens of millions of dollars in an inheritance tax, or spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribing congressmen and hiring advertizing execs to sell "cutting the death tax" to Republican suckers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Are you kidding?
The cost/benefit ratio soars when you only have to buy a few well-paid shills in high-placed positions to write your own regulatory laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. CBC's Fifth Estate did a story on this recently. Here's the video.
Edited on Wed Jan-03-07 11:01 PM by tuvor
Entitled "The Denial Machine".

Rick Piltz talks about where the strategy of creating uncertainty as to the science on global warming originated.

Rick Piltz: I think this is a strategy that dates back. Actually it dates back to the tobacco industry and the smoking health effects, but, if you bring it forward into the nineteen nineties, there's a strategy that was developed by a range of political operatives in the industry and in these advocacy groups to hold off regulation, to hold off pressure to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, by pursuing a strategy of manufacturing an enhanced sense of uncertainty about global warming, and that's what they've done.

And, even though they've ended up promoting a position that's far outside the mainstream of the science community, they've kind of, so far, won politically in that they have completely tied the hands of getting anything done about the global warming problem.


Runs about 40 minutes. Hope you all find it as worth watching as I did.

Go to this link and click on the red videocam on the right side under "Watch the Fifth Estate online".
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/denialmachine/piltz.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks for posting that!
I'll check it out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're quite welcome. Today was the second time I watched it.
It's a cliche, but I don't know how some people sleep at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. So perhaps there's a possibility of lawsuits against Exxon if we can show
their effort to cloud the waters was a significant causative factor in the atmosphere's destruction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps one of many HALF-VAST RW conspiracies. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC