My God - Here is the feminist agenda - I never knew people thought this way.

I've been out trying to find out what a feminist fascist is. And I ran onto this absolutely unbelievable site.

http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=news&file=article&sid=713

Feminists want fathers and men destroyed. They daily advance policies and programs designed to wipe out fathers and families and want to rape families....


Well, I never knew we were so horrible.

And everyone should get out there and vote against Democrats because they are apparently the bastion of these despicable individuals (namely women with a mind or an opinion).

Wow - I'm completely shocked. Shocked.

Sounds like there's a lot of work to do! ;)

And California is the devils nest. I guess that shouldn't come as a big surprise. They are always first at everything. Those sinners.

it's just to the right of it and has only got 5 votes so far.

I already gave it 1 star, someone should post a "du this stupid article" thread..

than everyone else :eyes:

These folks are absurd.

Wow, I have been sooooo educated.:silly:

Me bad.

What is really unbelievable is that there are people out there that actually believe this stuff. That should give us all nightmares.

:wow:

For years as a male supporter of the feminist movement I have been attempting to destroy myself. Unfortunately I am more wiley than I gave myself credit for and have proven to be a difficult opponent to destroy. But my mission goes on. I swear to you I will not rest until I have destroyed myself.

Most of the men I know don't think this way - thank God. I think they would be surprised to find that women are so awful.

but you're just too quick for us. We'll try harder, I promise. :patriot:

I must be destroyed. I support you in your valiant mission to eradicate me. Keep up the good work... (ouch)

:spank:

That should come with a spew alert. :rofl: :applause:

Gloria Steinem's real agenda!

:sarcasm:

or did I miss something?

Last I heard of her was in a documentary a year ago...something about abortion.

Her husband died and that had to have been awful. They weren't married very long and he died of cancer, I think. I haven't seen much about her in a long time.

But I really miss her. Her insight into stuff was wonderful.

her home state. She was all over the state.

I just got an email from her a couple of weeks ago regarding that asshole, Kerouack who was appointed to head up Family Planning. He, of course, is against birth control. Gloria is working with Planned Parenthood.

She is also working with a feminist radio station in NYC along with Jane Fonda.

She's still doing lots of good work. It's just that we have a MSM that NEVER covers feminist issues.

You all being witchcraft-practitioning lesbians who want to kill your husbands. :rofl:

I think Jerry Falwell blew the whistle on that plot.

So that shows you what kind of an amoral monster I am.

I hunt down men with an AK 47 and blast them away while they sleep.

I guess I wasn't dreaming.

Maybe I should buy body armor & put it on while I sleep.

You men made a BIG mistake in giving us sharp knives to cut brownies for the kids.

:sarcasm:

Wish I had a picture of Kathy Bates from Fried Green Tomatoes to go along with that quote :-)

Not there's much difference between the two.

TlalocW

to eliminate men from the reproduction cycle? :rofl:

Actually, I always kind of liked sex with men - as opposed to nonsex with male scientists.

Who else are you going to gossip with about your girlfriends?

I didn't think about that one. That makes me a mega monster I think.

If you're a stay at home mom, and a feminist, plenty of opportunities will arise. While you're at home using some of that surplus time to get informed, Republican friends and family are tuned into right-wing radio at work. So, when you get into battle with them at family get togethers and start challenging their opinions, the first thing that pops out of their mouth when they start losing is, "So, when are you getting a job?"

Never in a million years did I believe that a stay at home feminist would be the one that would be arguing the benefits of being a stay at home mom.

someone's been reading too much Irving...

and making any intelligent, liberal "sperm producing" men live naked in cages. How could they forget that? :shrug:

n/t

Better make it French wine served with hummus and pita chips!

:evilgrin:

:evilgrin:

:bounce: shit, I could almost get into this stuff, I'm scaring myself! :scared:

you tagged my aspirations...

That sounds exciting! :popcorn: :bounce:



I'm beginning to get a mental picture of the person who wrote this, and it's pretty damn scary.

support for his children.

There are some men who really get a raw deal. I will admit that. But this sounds just a few miles beyond the pale.

This nutjob sounds like he hates them. Child support: the horror! Horrible, horrible anti-violence against women programs! Why, oh, why, are deadbeat, wife-beating dads so horribly put upon by this evil feminist agenda??

Now excuse me while I go eat a baby in honor of my rep., Nancy Pelosi, taking over the government. (Yep! I'm an evil San Francisco feminist!)

I'm old enough to remember the nonsense that was in the media when the ERA was going around for ratification by the states.

It failed, in large part thanks to hysterical diatribes like this one. Two anti-ERA screeds that resonated particularly well with voters were, "You'll be required to have unisex toilets in public buildings" and "Husbands will no longer be required to support their wives."

Well, unisex toilets would have been taken care of by the right to privacy, and it has NEVER been a legal requirement for husbands to support their wives. Far from it--in the olden days, all of a woman's property, including inheritances and personal property, such as jewelry and clothing, became the legal property of her husband upon marriage, to use as he saw fit. If he was alcoholic or addicted to opium, he could not only waste his own property to finance his habit, but hers as well, including any money she tried to earn on the side. If her husband decided to divorce her, she walked out of the house with literally nothing but the clothes she was wearing at the time. (She couldn't divorce him, really, because he had control of all the household money.) That's why the first priority of the early feminists was the right for married women to retain property that they brought into the marriage or acquired during the marriage.

But thanks to Americans' ignorance of history, the ERA failed to gain ratification by the states.

Of all the things to argue about and they picked toilets.

And then there was the draft argument. Women would be drafted. That never went anywhere either.

What, precisely, is a unisex toilet? You mean the sit down variety I've got in my private bathroom?
Now, you're saying that they wanted to bring these abominations out into the public realm? Scandalous.

:sarcasm: :silly:

I think it's not Americans' ignorance of history, but rather, their propensity for indulging hysteria that allows them to entertain the idea that tinfoil hats are the only defense against common sense.

Maybe someone confused feminists with the fabled Amazon Women?

:shrug:

lmao

"Be careful guys, did you know that in most states in the United States, as a man, you are guilty of violence against your partner if you are "controlling" or cause any "emotional abuse." Controlling can be things like, not allowing them to spend you into bankruptcy (no joke there), or, if you were to suspect they were cheating, to DARE check on them. Emotional abuse is ANYTHING that she says you did. In fact, some courts even allow the "he looked at me and I was scared" to pass or "domestic violence." In the process, you have an arrest warrant issued in an "ex parte" hearing (a "hearing" where you are not present), the police come and take you out of your house, the courts seize ALL of your assets and your bank account(s), and you are GUILTY until PROVEN INNOCENT! If it is part of a divorce or custody action, WITHOUT your presence, you have your children taken away and are forced to pay child support and "spousal support" even if you did nothing wrong."

How dare the courts consider you abusive if you don't allow your wife to spend any money without your approval. How dare they think constantly spying on your wife to make sure she is not cheating on you is controlling behavior.

I think the guy has first hand experience with this and protests too much.

nothing wrong.

I get confused about that sometimes myself.

Extreme hatred of men and espousing tons of abortions (thus the nazi and Holocaust thing).

if my wife hadn't told me not to.

They found me out. And I was going to corner the market on vibrators and make enough money to rule the world. Bwhahahaha

Im Series THIS IS HUGH!!1111!!!!11!

And these guys (all white men, of course) believed:

1)That the Democratic Party of 2004 is WAY WAY WAY WAY to the left of the Democratic Party of the 1960s.

2) If you're a minority, the Republican Party was the place to be.

3) Bill Clinton just had to be impeached.

4) And, we just had to invade Iraq. This was Sept or October of 2004... I wonder if any of those 5 or 6 have changed their tune on that?

Also, this was the day that Bush was going to appear on the Rush Limbaugh show, and all these guys re-arranged their schedules so the could listen.

website was started by paid staff at some right-wing think tank. Would you?

It's all about going after that White Angry Male (with guns) vote.

Seems that these White Angry Males have seen the light....it's W and his economic and foreign policies that are ruining the quality of life here in the US....not the women.

We plan to keep SOME men around; afterall, someone's got to squish the bugs and clean out the gutters and fix the cars.

:silly:

We'll give them the jobs "no one else will do." They get especially dirty jobs if their last name is "Bush."

I propose that we have pleasure slaves with different talents, like fixing cars and getting stuff off the high shelves. And we will have to keep at least the following men around to entertain us: Keith O., Jon Stewart, Steven Colbert and George Clooney. :bounce:

He doesn't need to worry about "the radical feminist hell that will begin shortly after all the votes are finally counted" because he's going to be Raptured up pretty soon anyway. The job of the radical feminists is to prepare the way for the coming of the Antichrist.

Oh, and in my pleasure slave cage, can I get popcorn instead of chips?

I had no idea that was an option! :sarcasm:

(John Cleese voice) Well, I got better.

Did a little poking around and found this quote on that site:

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of 'Women's Rights,' with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to 'unsex' themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection." ~ Queen Victoria, March, 1870.

:rofl:

We are not amused....

Talk about exaggeration!

:wtf: :crazy:

Wow! I never knew.

:rofl:

show tomorrow! (The Air America syndicated show at 12:00 P.M. EST)

Looking forward to getting to the 500 or 1000th hour...!