Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here we go! Rush Holt up with Parliamentary Inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:33 PM
Original message
Here we go! Rush Holt up with Parliamentary Inquiry
Groans heard.

Now Putnam up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Putnam asked, if I understand this correctly
he wanted to know if the Repub is officially in that seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. no - he asked if Buchanan's race had be certified
by the FL Sos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It wasn't quite clear to me
He asked if the FL Sec of State had officially declared him in the seat. Pelosi answered 'that is correct'. So, not sure where it stood exactly. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. She said that it was "without prejudice" meaning...
...that the case is definitely not closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you
It gets confusing with the 'formal' language on stuff. (I confess...my Robert's Rules is very well worn from my service on committees and boards.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. actually,
it means the opposite, the case is closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. With prejudice means the body judges that the rep is accepted, without further consideration.
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 07:04 PM by Fridays Child
Without prejudice means that the body reserves the right to make a judgment, either for or against the rep, later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you have that backwards
I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Without/with prejudice...
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 08:07 PM by Fridays Child
prejudice (law)
In law, the phrase without prejudice means that a claim, lawsuit, or proceeding has been brought to a temporary end but that no legal rights or privileges have been determined, waived, or lost by the result.

snip

By contrast with prejudice means that a party's legal rights have in fact been determined and lost.

snip

http://www.answers.com/topic/prejudice-law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes
the fact is the Florida Secretary of State has certified him the winner of the election.

But the House gets to decide who to seat, and the committee will investigate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC