Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, the election was basically meaningless, & our votes irrelevant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:46 AM
Original message
So, the election was basically meaningless, & our votes irrelevant.
That seems to be the official bushco attitude toward the 06 election, it happened, he just didn't get it. I know he avoids newspapers, so maybe he didn't hear that the war is going poorly and the people are revolting.

He also avoids and ignores bad news, so when he hears it, he replaces the messenger, so maybe he didn't 'get the memo' from the generals on the ground and the people in flyover land.

The people spoke out against the republik war on Earth, they spoke loudly and clearly, but the king has shit in his ears, put there by dick cheney, his true father.

That's three elections in a row now that the ape seems to have missed. It's hard to get any real news or current events to the man, he's in his own little world where everything is good and shiny and happy.

Now the ape prepares to ratchet up the war, send more troops, and piss in our faces. Now is the time to reverse this situation, turn it around, upside down and inside out, and we, the people, need to show these nasty little men who exactly is meaningless and irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's not that he avoids news, he just doesn't care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Its really the only path he has open to him
If he backs down and starts pulling troops then it acknowledges that his entire war has been a catastrophuk. That is not a win for him.

If he continues to "Stay the course" then he will be percieved as having lost control. Doing nothing just sends the signal that he has lost the capacity to come up with anything.

So he must escalate. Its the Horton Hears a Who scenario. He swore he would win and that is what he is going to do. Of course this route gives him a lot of options.

In the case of the Dems staging a revolt and cutting off his funding or war powers they assume the burden of the war. George gets to walk away having kept the faith. He can play that it was his intent to bring Iraq freedom and Democracy but it was the Dems that stopped him.

Essentially the win in 06 freed George in a lot of ways. If we had not won then he and the Repugs would have to answer for the war fully. But with the Dems stepping into power we are primed to become the patsies. George can do pretty much anything aggressive in the war and walk away scott free because we will be there trying to stop him. And that will be spun as us stopping the only real chance Iraq had.

His tactic is quite well thought out. I would definately chalk it up to Rove. It is also utterly sociopathic as it puts more and more of our bravest in harms way as a means to preserve his legacy and the GOPs future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Remember that HE learned the "lesson" of Vietnam...
you only lose if you leave!

:puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Democrats are already pre-emptively blamed for the 'defeat'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Doesn't matter; the 'defeat' was the IWR...
... the product of a previous congress.

And history will so attest.

In the meantime, providing the barbarians with a cheap talking point or two is a small price to pay to save the lives of another 600,000 or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's all about posturing.
Bush is acting like he has a plan to win the war because he knows the Democrats are going to put an end to this fiasco before his term runs out. I think he's actually trying to goad the Democrats into cutting off funds for the war. He wants to be able to say "I would have won the war in Iraq if only the Democrats hadn't stopped me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. I see no reason for you to be up-set. Bush has been in office since 2000
Why would he do any thing different. Congress will have to do it and I am not so sure it dares to do it. I think they will let Bush play hero and run his war even if more men die/hurt. I was around when Vietnam was on and also Korea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. 2 much coffee
I need to decaf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think you are right. I am at my wits end of Bush and his doings.
I just think he will do what he wants and Congress must stop it but I do not think they have the guts. Maybe the new one do as they more of less ran on it but do you think those other old timers will dare to do it? My heart is not in it to think they will. I really do not think Bush cares what any one wants but himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The longer it runs, the more money is funneled from the People.
Two Billion Dollars a Week! And little George's band plays on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. WHEN CAN A PRESIDENT BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE


Iwas under the impression that a president could be removed from office if he failed to heed the will of the people,was deemed to be incompetent or mentaly unbalanced.
What the hell is "Pellosi" waiting for! She's been in office 24 hours -the honey- moom is over. GO TO WORK 'nan"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC