Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid Backtracks, Accepts Tougher Earmark Reform...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:16 PM
Original message
Reid Backtracks, Accepts Tougher Earmark Reform...
'Win a few, lose a few.

Yesterday, Paul reported on the fireworks erupting in the Senate over ethics reform. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) went to the wall for a watered-down reform proposal, which would have kept the public from knowing which lawmakers inserted billions of dollars worth of earmarked expenditures. Republicans, with the help of nine Democrats (and Joe Lieberman), kept him at bay by pushing an amendment that would force nearly all earmarks to be identified by their sponsors.'

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002331.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Am I wrong to be amused?
I adore that the Republicans gathered their might to force the stronger reform. That's absolutely hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. wacky bunch'ah guys & gals alright, i see leiberman was right in there as well...
those poor CT voters :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't this a good thing??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, it is a good thing. Now we'll know which assholes keep spending our money on crap...
money which could be going to useful things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think Reid's thinking is that he might need to buy off a few GOPers...
to get the Chimp impeached! But otherwise, thank fricken' God.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Senators like Cantwell and Feingold called bullshit on Harry Reid here.
Sen. DeMint (R) simply inserted the tougher language found in Pelosi's version of the bill, thereby blindsiding Reid. Excellent tactical maneuver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC