Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The next President will carry the DLC Stamp of Approval. Guaranteed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:30 PM
Original message
The next President will carry the DLC Stamp of Approval. Guaranteed.
OK, so it's official now. Even Novak is calling the Republics dead meat. That means one thing. The corporations aren't gonna waste much of their money on th Puggies, and they certainly aren't gonna pour the big bux into liberal coffers. There's only one place for it to go. You guessed it. The DLC is about to become wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. It's the only place for the corporate influence-peddlers to go. Suddenly there are going to be so many Dinos running around that you're gonna think you've been shanghaied to the movie set of Jurassic Park.

Now maybe we know the real story behind the Lieberman ascendance and why the Party let him do it. Come 2008, he'll either be the king or the head kingmaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I don't count my chickens before they hatch and I certainly
don't take Novak's word for everything. I also put more faith in the Democrats who vote in the primaries and caucuses to select our nominee. And I definitely don't think that Lieberman is going to be the kingmaker of the Democratic party--it seems more likely to me he may be on a GOP ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I do think there will be a shift away from the Puggies;
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 05:39 PM by Jackpine Radical
suddenly they're pretty toxic, and the bux guys are gonna shift their bets to where they think they can both buy a win and buy influence after the election.

As to Lieberman, that was an afterthought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. And when the dems take back the White House in '08,
we will be told to shut the fuck up about election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. And nothing else useful is gonna get done, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. As long as they don't fuck up another campaign...
You can always tell when DLC advisers take over. A firebrand like Obama gets so bland you can't discern his position on anything. A committed environmentalist like Gore starts to sound like big business is his best friend and it'll be business as usual, all the way. A pit bull prosecutor like Kerry tries to look avuncular and tell jokes while trying to defend votes in the Senate that he's now free to say were mistakes.

None of it works, of course, because only psychopaths can manage to be that fake and if there's one thing the US public can't stand, it's a fake.

Those corporate lobbyists who run campaigns every election season need to stick to their day jobs this time. Our country may depend on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think you're mostly right, except for the part where you say
"if there's one thing the US public can't stand, it's a fake." I think it's the blandness, not the fake business, that puts them off. How else explain Bush? Or Ronnie Raygun for that matter. Both of those guys were as phony as a nine-peso Euro. Th DLC will probly win 2008 by default because any Puggy candidate would be DOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Bush is likely a psychopath, exempted from the standard
and Reagan was a skilled actor. Both were nearly impossible to spot by anyone but Democrats with highly suspicious minds and giant sized BS meters.

Not so the Democratic candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, Bush is a psychopath, with strong narcissistic traits.
I'm always amazed, though, at how many people have a totally unwarranted confidence in their ability to assess the sincerity of others. Hervey Cleckley, who wrote the original classic text on psychopathy (The Mask of Sanity), commented that he wasn't always good at spotting psychopaths; his office staff were much better. Whenever someone went into Cleckley's office to be evaluated and walked out having borrowed money from him, the staff knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary is going to be the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. If not Lieberman, they will attempt to foist someone they can easily manipulate
or control on us.

Isn't that always the way? The corporate heads have their own version of "the lesser of evils."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah. The other Clinton, for example.
The one who got NAFTA and welfare "reform" through, put his pushy wife Whatsername in charge of coming up with a health care plan, and invented don't ask, don't tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. That'd be one...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. What's this? Novak said it, so it must be true?

Yikes.

____________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. cool.nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dupe
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 06:26 PM by Lex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What dupe?
This is about my assessment of the current and upcoming political situation. It's not about Novak. I could as easily have left the Novak reference out of the post. Certainly there are reasons other than Novak's comments to think that the Puggies are in eclipse. I'm talking about what might mean for corporate lobbying behavior.

Piss off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
generaldemocrat Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not all the big bucks are locked up at the DLC....
Not all business concerns support the DLC. A candidate who doesn't have the DLC seal of approval can alternatively curry the support of small and medium business owners or professionals (like engineers, doctors) or wealthy non-DLC philanthropists (lke George Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett).

The DLC is not the end all be all in our party when it comes to money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I can only hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC