Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is The U.S. Planning a Horrific Global Nuclear War?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:10 PM
Original message
Is The U.S. Planning a Horrific Global Nuclear War?
All the safeguards of the Cold War era, which categorized the nuclear bomb as "a weapon of last resort" have been scrapped. "Offensive" military actions using nuclear warheads are now described as acts of "self-defence".

The distinction between tactical nuclear weapons and the conventional battlefield arsenal has been blurred. America's new nuclear doctrine is based on "a mix of strike capabilities". The latter, which specifically applies to the Pentagon's planned aerial bombing of Iran, envisages the use of nukes in combination with conventional weapons.

As in the case of the first atomic bomb, which in the words of President Harry Truman "was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base", today's "mini-nukes" are heralded as "safe for the surrounding civilian population".

Known in official Washington, as "Joint Publication 3-12", the new nuclear doctrine (Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations , (DJNO) (March 2005)) calls for "integrating conventional and nuclear attacks" under a unified and "integrated" Command and Control (C2).

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info:80/article17206.htm

:dem: :dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a scary and real possibility. With a boy king thinking that
nuclear bombs and war are just games. Not reality. This is what is the most scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Us against EVERYBODY ELSE?
My, won't that work well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably not.
Next question: Is the US planning a groovy beach party to save the surf shack from real estate moguls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. "The U.S." isn't planning that. Certain people in the government may be...
...but most of us, and those we just elected as our representatives, are trying to end war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nukes have been burning a hole in the military's collective
pocket for a very long time. Again and again, generals have suggested their use in some conflict or other, from Korea through Vietnam and now in Iraq and possibly Iran. They've also been trying to build a small, "safe" nuke. Only the sensible precaution of having their commanders in the civilian world has stopped them.

Well, folks, there aint no such thing, not now, not ever. A small "tactical" nuke will still incinerate several square miles, burn out the retinas of anyone who happens to be looking in that direction, give a whopping dose of radiation to all civilians in the vicinity, and kick up a large amount of fallout to piss off all countries downwind from the idiocy of using one.

If this bunch uses just one, I'm sure this country will find itself on the losing end of a world war very, very quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't think it's the military. maybe the makers of the weapons but,
I do think the military is well aware of the dangerous nature and what the results would be. I think it's this administration with it's macho madness and thier lack of understanding the military and weapons. they don't respect them and they think it's like toys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe Junior had a Decider moment
He thunk real hard and had an Epiff Fanny. Perhaps a nukular winter to cure global warming? Hmmm.

Do you like me now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. well...it may put the brakes on all this global-warming talk.
i'm not saying that we won't get our hair mussed...but a good old-fashioned nuc-u-lar winter may be just the ticket to save our beloved coastlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. No, no, no.
Just a neat, little, surgical nuclear war, to remind the world who's in charge.

Then we can get started on the New American Century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think they ARE..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah I think
they are just crazy enough to use those nukes, sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC