Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scooter Libby Trial - Watch Out For Juror No. 0677

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:45 AM
Original message
Scooter Libby Trial - Watch Out For Juror No. 0677
And then there's Juror No. 0677. She is a television producer. She claimed she had paid attention to the case in a "circumfery" manner, and she has booked some of the journalists involved in the case. She was questioned about her ties to these reporters and whether she could evaluate their testimony without favor. She said yes. As for Cheney, she said, "I don't have any objective feelings about whether he would be more or less credible in this case."

She also mentioned that she was once an intern at the National Journalism Center and then an intern at The Washington Times, the conservative newspaper owned by Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church. There were no queries from the judge and lawyers about these connections. Yet might she be a conservative harboring pro-administration inclinations? Though the National Journalism Center has a bland name, it is a rightwing outfit that trains young conservative journalists and finds them jobs. Not all of its graduates are ideologically minded. But the group was launched in part by the American Conservative Union. It has received funding from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and the John M. Olin Foundation, leading conservative foundations. (The John M. Olin Foundation funded itself out of business in 2005.) Several years ago, the National Journalism Center was taken over by another conservative group, the Young Americas Foundation.

Jurors ought not be blackballed for their political views. But if a National Journalism Center graduate makes it on to the jury, the Libby legal team would have reason to be pleased. Fitzgerald might want to ask her a few more questions.


http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=158370
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. she sounds deceptive to be certain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. And if it weren't for the bloggers, we'd never know this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Wow. Given the want of integrity on the part of the MSM, it's difficult not to marvel
at the saving role played and still being played by the bloggers, on behalf of the American people, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. She was accepted, but they kicked off the juror
who said they would believe the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. pining for a hung jury -- it only takes one...maybe two to fish up the works: she smells
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Both the prosecution and defense
will whittle down the jury pool. By late afternoon, or by Friday, they'll have 36 people that Judge Walton views as potential jurors. The defense can strike 12, the prosecution 6 (maybe 8). They'll end up with 16; 12 with be seated as jurors, and 4 will be alternates. Libby will be convicted on all counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Optimism to the nth degree!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Was hoping you'd chime in here.
It's too bad you're not allowed in the courtroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. If anyone's reading this morning's blogging at firedoglake
The questioning's changed even overnight, which leads the blogger to believe that the prosecution has managed to make some inroads since yesterday.

They haven't even started the peremptory challenges. All three potential jurors that have appeared this morning so far were all dismissed by the judge for cause.

This isn't over yet. Not by a long shot.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for keeping us up to date, Julie!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Off topic, but funny story about juries.
My friend was chosen to be part of a jury slection process, and one of the people in her pool was asked some questions and was dismissed when she mentioned that her former boyfriend was in prison..convicted by the same judge..

she was excused :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R! Important story!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks for kicking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You bet! And bookmarked too.
I hope this Moonie rat gets weeded out.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC