Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life in prison for adultery??? As the law stands now...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:33 PM
Original message
Life in prison for adultery??? As the law stands now...
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/nation/16487863.htm?source=rss&channel=cctimes_nation

"DETROIT - In a ruling sure to make philandering spouses squirm, Michigan's second-highest court says that anyone involved in an extramarital fling can be prosecuted for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, a felony punishable by up to life in prison.

"We cannot help but question whether the Legislature actually intended the result we reach here today," Judge William Murphy wrote in November for a unanimous Court of Appeals panel, "but we are curtailed by the language of the statute from reaching any other conclusion."

"Technically," he added, "any time a person engages in sexual penetration in an adulterous relationship, he or she is guilty of CSC I," the most serious sexual assault charge in Michigan's criminal code.

No one expects prosecutors to declare open season on cheating spouses. The ruling is especially awkward for Attorney General Mike Cox, whose office triggered it by successfully appealing a lower court's decision to drop CSC charges against a Charlevoix defendant. In November 2005, Cox confessed to an adulterous relationship..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beats being put to death, (Leviticus 20:10). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh that wacky Leviticus. Seems he's always trying to burn or stone somebody to death
but he's especially hard on the family.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Cheers
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you get more time in jail if you're gay on top of the adultery?
Hmmmm, maybe I should rephrase that a little . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Calling Newt Gingrich........
He's the first guy who should be prosecuted under this law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, poor folks with a crappy attorney go to prison forever for consensual, adulterous fucking
Nice to know we live in a tolerant country. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Great news for the For Profit Prison Industry!
I'm sure their stock will soar. The land of the free will have the chance to put even more of it's citizens in jail and deny them the right to vote. But what the hell, we never know if they actually count them or not anyway. We do know the "Decider" doesn't give a rat's ass what we vote for in any event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's hard enough to abstain from drugs to ease a life of poverty, but now...
NO UNAPPROVED SEX!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. see that's what's so offensive: they regulate our very state of mind.
"The beatings will continue until morale improves."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Bring on the Talibornagain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. and if not forever, then when they get out they're 'sex offenders'
and get listed on a website so their neighbors can spit on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Or shoot them accidentally
"Oops! Your honor, I accidentally shot an unGodly, unAmerican sex offender."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Read the back story, it's schadenfreude. The AG pushing this (repub, of course) could be prosecuted
himself under the statute - he has confessed to an adulterous affair.

hee, hee, hee - chickens home to roost and all....

They do need to get rid of such ridiculous morality laws, but I think it's only fair that the AG should be the first to face the music under his own pet prosecutions.

I mean repubs are the "family values" & "personal responsibility" & "law and order" party aren't they???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's the irony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. so is the felony for the person who cheats
or the person banging them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. How stupid--but it must have a lot of GOP lawmakers on edge
as well as wacky fundie ministers in Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. It will never be applied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gotta love that Christian-inspired theocratic government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No it is STUPID LEGISLATIVE WRITING
See my post below, Adultery was NOT part of the underlying case, it was given as an example of a Crime that could be used to give someone life imprisonment under this poorly drafted statute (Through just repealing Adultery as a Felony would also eliminated this problem).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here is the opinion of the Court
Here is the Opinion of the Court:
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/DOCUMENTS/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20061107_C270229_28_270229.OPN.PDF

The Legislature of Michigan has defined various sex crimes and called them "Criminal Sexual Conduct" or CSC. CSC-1 occurs whenever a person "Penetrates" another person while committing another Felony. In this case the Felony was selling Oxycontin for sex. The "Penetration" was the consensual Sex act in exchange of the Oxycontin. Under Michigan law anyone convicted of a CSC-1 can be sentenced to life imprisonment.

There was NO Adultery occurred in this particular case. The Adultery angle occurred in that Adultery is still a felony in Michigan (Through no one has been convicted since 1971). Given that Adultery is still a felony, under the Wording of CSC 1, penetration while committing adultery meets the requirements of CSC-1 enhanced penalties (i.e. Life Imprisonment).

The Michigan papers found out about this decision and ran with it for the Attorney General of Michigan in 2005 admitted to having had an Adultery Relationship. As this statute is Written the Attorney General could have been convicted of CSC-1 and sentenced to Life imprisonment. Given that the Attorney General was the one who filed this appeal and won on appeal, that fact was just to good to be left alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Excellent clarification
Thank you, happyslug.:-)

(Sorry for the dupe. I did check to see if it had been posted, but I guess I didn't look far enough back.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Duplicate, this was on yesterday's DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Attorney General Mike Cox. Maybe his assistant is named Mike Hunt.
I mean, Come On!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Okay. That took me a second
but then I got it!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Where are all the anti-immigrant people screaming that "the law must be enforced"
and "what you don't want our laws enforced!"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC