Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buchanan writes “See the Superpower Run”, recognizes *’s failure but blames Democrats.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:27 PM
Original message
Buchanan writes “See the Superpower Run”, recognizes *’s failure but blames Democrats.
”See the Superpower Run” by Patrick J. Buchanan
But Congress is not trying to run a war. Congress is trying to get out of Iraq and get on record opposing the "surge." Congress is running after popular opinion.
* * * * * * * * *
We want him to use Sunni and Kurdish brigades of the Iraqi Army, in concert with the U.S. Army, to smash the Mahdi Army of Moqtada al-Sadr, the most popular Shia leader in the country and the principal political support of Maliki. We are asking Maliki to turn on his ruthless Shia patron and bet his future on an America whose people want all U.S. troops home, the earlier the better.

For Maliki to implement fully the U.S. conditions would make him a mortal enemy of Moqtada and millions of Shia, and possibly result in his assassination. Whatever legacy Bush faces, he is not staring down a gun barrel at that.
* * * * * * * * *
It is over. What we need to face now are the consequence of the folly of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice in launching this unnecessary and unprovoked war, the folly of the neocon snake oil salesmen who bamboozled the media into believing in this insane crusade to bring democracy to Baghdad in the belly of Bradley fighting vehicles and the folly of the Democratic establishment in handing Bush a blank check for war out of political fear of being called unpatriotic.


For Buchanan to blame the Democrats for the mess caused by Bush, his neoconservative handlers, and a hundred million docile Republican followers is a most disingenuous ploy. :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is his 'party'? Isn't Buchanan a Liberterian? ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Buchanan has handlers they are conservative handlers. He seems to despise the neo-conservatives.
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 06:43 PM by w4rma
"handing Bush a blank check" is the same argument I see on DU all the time from the vast majority of progressives.

And I somewhat agree with the argument, however I also understand that there are two factions within the Democratic Party. One has been and still is pro-war (The DLC/neo-liberal faction) and the other, many of whom voted against the IWR, is not pro-war (The progressive faction).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. one point here
I think anybody that voted for the IWR was cowardly, calculating, lazy and stupid.

They succumbed to hysteria and hype over principles and investigation.

If I, as an average internet user, knew the whole deal was bullshit in 2003, then the Senate and House should have known also.

Bush's shameless exploitation of 9-11 fears and sorrows sucked them in. No one that voted for this should end up being a presidential nominee.

-85% jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He does despise the neo conservatives
because he thinks they are all Jews. There is a very strong strain of anti Semitism and racism in Pukecannon's political views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Buchanan is still trying to defend Vietnam and Nixon.
He fights those battles every sing day, still vainly trying to sell the Domino Theory. He's blamed the Dems for everything for decades now but mostly he blames them for taking Nixon down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Buchanan is actually right
The democrats were gutless and rolled over to support this war in 2002.

Let's face it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Agree but the Republicans were the majority party and it is they who gave
Bush a blank check.

IMO, the worst anyone can say about Democrats is they went along with the scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jelly Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sad to say, but I agree with you.
Now, the Dems are not primarily to blame and since they were in the minority their will would not have carried the day, so it is unfair to say that the Dems handed Bush his blank check. However, they did stand silently by while the Rebublicans performed the handing over of the check. The Dems could have asked more questions about the war, making it more difficult for the court of public opinion to approve of the Republicans as they passed their war measures. I think Kerry would have taken the Presidency in '04 had they done so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC