Should the Congress introduce a non-binding no confidence resolution against Bush?

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:29 PM
Original message

Poll question: Should the Congress introduce a non-binding no confidence resolution against Bush?

Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 07:34 PM by originalpckelly

If the Senate and the House can pass a non-binding resolution on Iraq, why not do one for their confidence in Bush's leadership?

It might even ask him and the VP to resign.

Would you support this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tblue

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message

1. I wanted to choose 'Hell Yes!'

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. I'll put that in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. Damn, someone voted for other, so it didn't get up there with yes!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

porphyrian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message

3. Not instead of a binding one or something more fitting, like impeachment...

...but, at least, to be on record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Hosnon

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message

5. Yes. I think it is appropriate at this point.

Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 07:33 PM by MJDuncan1982

And yes, I am stalking you tonight:)

P.S. Please change the "Bushes" to "Bush's"...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. Sorry, I typed it very quickly!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Hosnon

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. I figured...on a post blitz this evening? nt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. Lots of thinking and lots of ideas...

no idea what might come next!

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

msongs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message

9. should'nt all resolutions regarding bushler be binding as possible?

action is what is needed. action is what matters. impeachment is what is required, not a whine.

non-binding resolutions are just posturing and politicking and gives politicians to to Nothing and pretend they did something.

Msongs
www.msongs.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. Well, in this case, the only action which could happen...

would be the calling for elections, but of course the Congress can't do that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ContraBass Black

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message

11. No, they should spend the debating and voting time passing something with teeth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MrSlayer

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message

12. This non-binding crap is ridiculous.

It's all meaningless shit. Colbert had it right the other night when "Symbolic" was the "Word". Basically he was saying that we didn't vote these people in to not take any real action. And passing non-binding resolutions is not taking any real action. There is overwhelming evidence to impeach and convict these bastards, so much evidence that it would be impossible for anyone to not vote to convict and still keep their job. But they won't do it. The more I look at this kind of shit the more I'm convinced that those who say the two party system is just designed to keep us distracted from the people that really run the show, the corporations and world banks, are correct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Individualist

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #12

14. Agreed

All words, no action.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TahitiNut

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jan-19-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message

13. Meaningless lip service is no substitute for their Constitutional duty.

Impeach. Remove, Indict. Convict. Imprison. (Rinse. Repeat.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.