Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More on the Purge of US Attorneys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 01:47 AM
Original message
More on the Purge of US Attorneys
Former House staffer Scott Lilly explains what is going on:

Six U.S. Attorneys Fired. Why?

By Scott Lilly

January 19, 2007

Frederick Black had served for more than a decade as acting U.S. Attorney to the territory of Guam, having been appointed by President George H. W. Bush in 1991. In 2002 he was directing a long-term investigation into allegations of public corruption in the administration of Gov. Carl Gutierrez—a probe that had already produced numerous indictments of Guitierrez’ cronies. But a day after a Guam grand jury issued a subpoena demanding records from the Guam Superior Court that documented payments to Republican lobbyist extraordinaire Jack Abramoff, Black was relieved of his position.

In an article headlined, “Bush Removal Ended Guam Investigation,” The Los Angeles times reported that “a U.S. grand jury in Guam opened an investigation of controversial lobbyist Jack Abramoff more than two years ago, but President Bush removed the supervising federal prosecutor, and the probe ended soon after.” With at least six prominent federal prosecutors recently removed from office, many of them managing large scale public corruption cases, many are wondering if history is not repeating itself.

Among those fired were Carol Lam, the U.S. Attorney for San Diego, who last year won a conviction against Congressman Duke Cunningham (R-CA) in the biggest bribery conviction in history, and Paul Charlton of Arizona, whose office is investigating charges involving land deals and influence peddling against of Republican Congressman Rick Renzi (R-AZ).


http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/01/court.html/print.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. We are witnessing an assault on the judicial branch of our government.
Attorneys, like judges, need to be independent in order to ensure that justice is a possible motive for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I thought the assault was clear when we got Scalia.
Neutering the judiciary branch is one of the long-term goals since Nixon was told he had to turn over the damn tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am a fan of Scalia. Allow me to explain:
His opinions are logically beautiful. It is obvious from them that the man is very skilled in the rules of formal logic. His reasoning is nearly perfect. In other words, if you accept his premises, you must accept his conclusions.

Of course, I have issue with his premises.

Nevertheless, it is hard to read one of his opinions and not nod along the entire time...at least in regard to his logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Anything reasoned on a false premise is crap.
His premises are uniformly false. He was put in place to make false look true. I tend not to admire that.

I mean, this is aside from committing treason with the Florida 2000 decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Right...I admitted that much.
The conclusions he reaches may suck but the logic connecting the premises to the conclusions is usually spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. That is a very common feature among very bad people with a high degree
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 04:41 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
of worldly intelligence.

However, the fact that you are so impressed, not by the turpitude of his premises, but by the "beauty" of his ineluctable logic, doesn't speak highly for your sense of priorities, never mind your capacity for outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The privatisation of prisons is intrinsically obscene. And part of the
reason why it is so obscene, is precisley because the political right wing, who always of course favour privatisation, constitute the most dangerous and pernicious, criminal sector of mankind: white-collar crime - if only, in the case of the more decent right-wingers, by association.

When I say most evil, it is because, enjoying such an exalted status in the worldly pecking order, they have all the more power over the lives of the more innocent, less worldly people. And among these, are many people who are driven by the economic and social oppression to which they are subjected, to such an extremity that they driven into crime, at the street level, ie. the violence perpetrated throughout the country in the prosecution of crimes of all kinds, which affect everyone in some way, (bar the predators who love in their moated estates, and now pay even less of their always disproportionately low level of income tax, in terms of their incomes).

Although, there are always people at every level of society who are simply evil, the number of convicted (and unconvicted) criminals in our societies is a function of the level of stress imposed on the general public through the wickedness of their far right-wing governments who front for the psychopathic corporatism, in the thrall of which we find ourselves.

So the privatisation of prisons is just another obscenity too far. Prisons and their purposes are a social problem, and it is incumbent on society to deal with them, not the psychopathic big business which has made their magnitude and in some regards their scandalous regimes (even prior to privatisation) an international disgrace of a comparably enormous order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. You make the mistake of assuming I can't both admire his reasoning
and dislike his rulings - which tends to be the case.

I'm likewise impressed with the way in which Hitler rose to power. It is a matter of compartmentalizing. I can take a person as a whole or I can take a person as his or her individual characteristics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. O my gawd, a FAN?
For his "logically beautiful" reasoning? I fail to see the beauty in this:

    Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.
    -- Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, First Clinically Insane Member of the Supreme Court
He is a wart on the face of the court, one who will go down as one of the worst justices, ever (just like the "worst president, ever" he ushered into power).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Presumably,
he is working off of the idea that a proper trial (and a proper sentence) takes into account the factual element - which is actually a prominent view in the law. The fact-finder, usually the jury, is given the task of determining the facts. Those facts don't have to be 100% accurate for the court system to accept them. If so, the court system would grind to a halt.

Again, I disagree that that principle should be applied in death sentence cases, but if it is, I can see why he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. You're right. It's a great way to neuter the judiciary by putting clowns on the bench.
How can Fat Tony not realize he was put there specifically for his stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is out and out rule by a despot -- he cannot be allowed
to continue to do this. We all need to hit the streets -- or we deserve our fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. 54 people have read this -- and no fucking comments?
:wtf: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. It is hard to understand how this is going on. I myself hardly
understand this move. I know that Gonzales was asked about this in the investigations yesterday,and he said it was to improve management. What I don't seem to understand is does management trump the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. for some additional comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just when I think it can't possibly get any worse, it does! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. oh oh oh
this does not look good...in other words if anyone brings the wrong doers to trial, or investigates, we can expect the investigators to be relieved of their jobs??? hmmmm...America...wake up baby...we need you to see what's going on, right under your nose...
wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush has been pulling this crap since day one
Just google the Koch case.

Within days after he was sworn in, back in 2001, Bush shut down an investigation and prosecution of the Koch Corporation, the largest privately-owned energy company in the United States. Koch was facing criminal charges from Clinton Administration investigations that totalled a potential 100 years in federal prison for Koch executives and nearly half a billion dollars in fines for having not only allowed 91 metric tons of carcinogens to be released into the environment in Texas but, even worse, having fraudulently covered up the crime. The crime occurred in Texas while Bush was Governor. Bush ordered Ashcroft to interrupt the prosecution of the U.S. Attorney and cut a sweatheart deal, reducing the penalties to a slap on the wrist. No one did any time.

Koch was one of Bush's major political campaign contributors and only gives to Republicans. In his first few weeks of interaction with the press, Ari Fleischer did the song and dance and ducked the question as to whether George Bush would return the campaign contribution.

No one seems to remember the Koch case, as by now there have been so many outrages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Very good reminder of the Koch case.
Thanks, I didn't have a clue about that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. As well, isn't Chucklenuts sister Doro married to one of the Koch's???
Don't be at all surprised if Patrick Fitzgerald doesn't lose his job as the Federal prosecutor in Chicago as well.

I didn't agree with too much of former Illinois Senator Peter Fitzgerald agenda, but when he got Patrick Fitzgerald named as US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, he did the right thing there.

I hope and pray Senator Leahy goes after Gonzo big time about these "resignations".

This is a complete farce and a complete disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. Reason #6: US Attys Prosecute Contempt of Congress Charges
So much for "oversight." You can almost hear the teeth dropping to the floor.

As if they weren't already impotent under "rule by signing statement."

Perhaps this purge will help some LieberDems to wake up and smell the coffee.

Only Impeachment... is a substantive, resistant act.

It IS our positive agenda.

It is our ONLY moral, patriotic option.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And when he invades Iran -- this must not fall to the wayside!
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 02:38 AM by BushDespiser12
These bastards feel they are untouchable -- we have let it slide too far already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You are correct.
But expect the investigate first posts (whatever that means). And I love your post "Only Impeachment". But as far as what's going on in America, it has to stop and has to now and by the means the constitution intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. IMPEACHMENT IS INEVITABLE
These ass clowns are going to jail. There is no doubt in my mind. This time there will be no "pardon for the good of the country." Fuck Ford. For all his good intentions, by putting a band-aid on a melanoma, we now have aggressive lymphoma. Cheney and Rumsfeld and their cronies. These criminals should've gone to jail along with Nixon. This will be our last chance to stop these tin plated despots with delusions of grandeur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. It's that simple
The good news is that by the time Bushco is stopped, everyone will see the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The bad news is if he isn't stopped soon there will be no light
Nuclear winter looms in the future if the Thugs are not removed and jailed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. It better damn be! It's the only way out of Iraq in the next two years, and it will
also put the brakes on the Iran war and the space arms race with the Chinese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. Can't Congress do something about this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Of course not! Dems are in the minority!
oh, wait....

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Allen Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Congress could repeal the Patriot Act.
How quickly can congress act? How many weeks would it take for Bush to sweep through the justice department, replacing professionals with his own hacks? The democratically controlled congress probably had in mind cleaning up the Patriot Act piece by piece. But it is such a can of worms that it might be better to repeal the whole thing. This also speaks to the folly of taking impeachment off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. What can the Dem Congress realistically do about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. Impeach. Rinse. Repeat.
Impeach
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you for posting this. This important story needs to get more attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I wish more people would pay attention
Prosecutorial discretion is an enormously powerful tool with no check on it whatsoever. The idea of putting this power in the hands of political hacks whose entire career suggests that they will do nothing but abuse the power for political ends is extremely frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is what happens when the rulers themselves are liars and crooks.
Bush has a checkered past himself, filled with episodes of driving while intoxicated, participating in illicit drug use (cocaine), at least one instance of insider trading, failure to report a large stock transaction in accordance to the law, failure to fulfill his National Guard Service duties, etc. His brother Neil has been implicated in a savings and loan scandal, and we don't know the extent of Poppy's illegal actions (Iran Contra, for one).

Dick Cheney has made out like a bandit with his Halliburton no-bid government contracts. This Iraq "war" has proven to be very lucrative for Cheney and the rest of these thugs (mis)leading our country. Even Rummy had a financial stake in the pharmaceutical company that manufactured the bird flu drug.

I never expected anything different from this (mis)administration before they came to power, and nothing they have done has surprised me. It also doesn't surprise me that they are purging anyone with integrity from positions of power, as this has been happening all along. Apparently, many people in many different positions in all levels of government have been fired since Bush took over, from employees in the National Park Service to scientists at NIH to operatives at the CIA. I remember reading about the shakeup at the CIA years ago. Anyone, in any position, in the government who openly disagrees with the Bush political machine has been let go. In fact, from one of Al Franken's books, I learned that all Democrats were fired from FOX "News" (which I also believe secretly receives govt. funding).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. The first crucial step: Impeach Gonzo!
Conyers must act forthwith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC