|
Personally I don't care one way or the other for Hillary as a nominee; I'm an agnostic as it were. That being stated, I find that Ms. Brewer's questioning to be so outrageous that I an actually reconsidering my opinion of Hillary's candidacy today, and am coming to the conclusion that it is impossible to believe that we as a Nation, could endure the despicable twenty-four hour a day mean-mouthing of her for the next two years and for four or eight years thereafter.
Ms. Brewer is asking question posed in the most vicious manner, smirking and saracastic...it's not so much the exact verbiage but the tone. Tweety does the same thing...sneering, of course, is not a legitimate argument during a formal debate, but it's a powerful tool on television. I don't know how this is going to play out but I will tell you that it's going to be a full-court press against Hillary from today forward.
It's a national tragedy that a capable woman whose I.Q. far far far exceeds the current resident of 1600, is subjected to this type of vituperative viciousness. Alternatively alliteratively, the poo-bah pundits will ruin whatever chances the Dems have of retaking the WH. No amount of fund-raising by the Clintons, no number of labor and environmental endorsements, no grass-roots web-oriented push, could possibly do anything against the full force of the MSM media, when they treat a nomineee as though she were a rabid dog. I believe that the higher powers (tinfoil alert) have decreed that they'll take someone from the Democrat(ic) party, but will not accept Hillary. Otherwise, we would be seeing a whole different approach.
I sincerely wish it were different.
|