The Bush family, the Cuban mafia and the Kennedy assassination

Learn what "your" government wants to keep secret:



The story's not perfect, but it's a lot closer to the TRUTH than what's been printed in the WaHoPo or NYWT or ABCNNBCBSFauxNoiseNutwork.

A PRESIDENT'S MURDER!

The Reich is trying to frame the debate (again):



An assassination is a murder that changes history.

How different our world would be today...

BTW: Someone ask me what Ray McGovern said.

... for going after the Truth.

Ray McGovern, in an interview with Randi Rhodes, discussed his changing beliefs regarding “Conspiracy Theorists.” He was asked about 9-11 and the security stand-down…

“All of that – all of that—strains credulity. I was foolish enough in my callow youth to believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission on the JFK assassination. That went on to even in my middle age I was inclined to believe the inquiry into the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Never. Never again, Randi, will I disparage people who look into these things and bear the brunt of crticicism as ‘conspiracy theorists.’ I think those people are doing a patriotic service to this country. And I think we have to remember The reason there are so many questions is this administration refuses to answer these questions.”

LINK:

http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/live/audio_highlights?from=10

Sorry it took so long, i miss america. I had to transcribe the above.

I almost cried when I first heard him say this.

BTW: How ya been? Long time no vid!

EDIT: Sorry if there's a tippo or two in the transcript. I'm at the rabbit and can't spend too much time doing real work.

I'm always amazed at how few people there are with true integrity. I thought about this last night, watching John Dean on Countdown.

Octafish, do you remember the literally dozens of hijackings to Cuba in 1968 by Palestinians? What the heck was that about? It never made sense to me what their purpose was, other than to create a negative image for Palestinians and Cuba. Then, they just seemed to stop as if the whole thing was a sanitized version of Operation Northwoods. I dunno.

In other post in this thread you wrote: "The guy in the White House, the CIA action officer as Oliver Stone called him, was Vice President Richard M. Nixon."

Nixon was CIA? Are there any other references to this or documented ties? If I remember Stone's Nixon movie correctly, wasn't there a scene where the dick - as president - visits the DCI's office, and has to kiss up to the guy? I didn't quite get that relationship or the history behind it. My impression was that Nixon was nervous and subservient because he knew what the shadow CIA did to JFK.

Great thread, Octafish.

:yourock:

I think you'll find your answer to that question.

a few years after the original scheme was proposed.

Have you come across anything that conclusively tied the late 60s hijackings to Northwoods?

In the USA, the hijackings to Cuba were people, kooks on the whole, interested in defecting to Cuba. The guys would pull a revolver and say: "Take this plane to Cuba." Upon landing, Fidel would imprison the turds.

In the Middle East, the hijackings by the PLO were political. In their attempts to raise awareness of the plight of the Palestinian people, many good and innocent people died.

Nixon was believed to be CIA connected, as was Prescott's boy, George Herbert Walker.


Nixon and Grampa Bush from their days together in the Sentate



The story is Prescott recruited Tricky to run for Congress in '46. The pecker.

Here's a bit on Tricky Dick, White House CIA Action Officer:



Regarding the Tricky Dick Nixon, CIA Action Officer:

Nixon thought he would be victorious in 1960. The story is Joseph Kennedy Sr. and LBJ ensured the voting in Illinois and Texas went DEM, enraging Nixon, Prescott, Dulles and the rest of the neo-Reich. So they lied and told JFK the Bay of Pigs operation would work -- even knowing the operation had been compromised.

The recently revealed records show that the Soviets and Cubans knew when, where and how the operation would take place. Gee. More treason. They never told President Kennedy.

If he had won, as president, Nixon would give the go-ahead for the Bay of Pigs invasion and backed it up with the armed forces of the USA. So what if World War III broke out? We -- as in those very few lucky enough to survive Armageddon -- wouldn't be commies.

Always helping to inform the people. Greatly appreciated.

George and Felix in the VP's office.


A GREAT site is http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com They have all types of good stuff and everything they back up with documents and the like.

Thanks for putting in the link, FreedomAngel82!

What Ray McGovern said:

... for going after the Truth.

Ray McGovern, in an interview with Randi Rhodes, discussed his changing beliefs regarding “Conspiracy Theorists.” He was asked about 9-11 and the security stand-down…

“All of that – all of that—strains credulity. I was foolish enough in my callow youth to believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission on the JFK assassination. That went on to even in my middle age I was inclined to believe the inquiry into the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Never. Never again, Randi, will I disparage people who look into these things and bear the brunt of crticicism as ‘conspiracy theorists.’ I think those people are doing a patriotic service to this country. And I think we have to remember The reason there are so many questions is this administration refuses to answer these questions.”

The link's above in this thread. I'll get it when I get a moment...

First it was the Bay of Pigs -- the generals were all for war. Then during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the generals, the Congressional leadership, the Cabinet -- all for war. Operation NORTHWOODS even described a plan that would use American civilians and service people casualties to invent a pretext for war.

The thinking in 1960 was that the Cuban exiles would retake their island and that they might need some help from the Pentagon. The guy in the White House, the CIA action officer as Oliver Stone called him, was Vice President Richard M. Nixon. At that time, the thinking was that Nixon would beat JFK in the fall. Things didn't turn out that way, so the tables were turned on JFK.

The CIA told the young President their plan for a Cuban exile victory would work WITHOUT American air cover and military support. The thing was the plan was already compromised. Fidel and the Soviets knew the invasion was coming. The only thing was, Allen Dulles didn't warn Kennedy.

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/02/980223_pigs.htm

Well that's odd. The CIA head is telling the President to go ahead with an illegal invasion, apparently in the know that it's doomed to failure, but hoping to get the US involved in a war.

Gee. I can only guess what went through JFK's mind when Lemnitzer brought the Operation NORTHWOODS plan. That operation called for staging terrorist attacks on American civilians and military facilities in Guantanamo Bay in order to rally public support for ... an invasion of Cuba. Kennedy said, "No" and fired Lemnitzer.

But, wait. There's more treason.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis of October, 1962, hen the Joint Chiefs of Staff, almost the entire cabinet, and most of Congress that had been briefed wanted JFK to launch a nuclear strike against the Soviet Union, even if it meant global nuclear war.

Thanks to Adlai Stevenson and Bobby Kennedy, the President ordered the government agencies to work out an alternative. That was the embargo. For his trouble keeping the world from ending, JFK was branded "soft" on communism and worse.

After the JFK assassination comes much more evidence indicating government duplicity in the killing. Chief among these is the concerted efforts to paint Oswald as being a communist sympathizer who wanted to shoot the President and then flee to Cuba. Those efforts continue to the present day.

Now THAT leads me to think the President's murder was a conspiracy.

PS: Odd how Kennedy's successor ignored JFK's plans to withdraw from Vietnam. Instead, LBJ used the staged Gulf of Tonkin incident to escalate US involvment, giving more power to the Military-Industrial Complex. These are the bedwetting bastids we call the BFEE.

The research presented by so many, including your most excellent efforts, amply make the case. And the behavior of this administration makes it even more plausible that those we trusted to lead us and keep our democracy safe, have betrayed us ten score and more. But there's another reason I believe it and that is because a trusted friend told me so. She tells of being young and visiting well placed GOPer relatives in California, being there on the night Kennedy was killed, and of the parties that went on cele bating the occasion. And then I read, somewhere, one of your threads(?), that was such a gathering in at least one large city in Texas and that 41 attended. Now I don't know if I have my facts straight on the 41 thing, but my friend was devastated that night in Nov. and she has not trusted government since.

I do wonder if there was a web-site solely devoted to BFEE and the three leaves of the Plame clover leaf, a combo of yours and H20Man's best, if a dent could be made in the minds of people who do not yet see or understand the treachery we've been and are surrounded by.

elsewhere in TX cheered when it was announced that JFK was dead

My head is exploding!

...What David Talbot:



Talbot is the founder and big cheese at Salon.com.

I think it's by Thom Hartman? Have you heard about it?

First, I must say I only know about the work through the reviews. I may buy it, but it's doubtful.

My problem with the new book is the authors say JFK and RFK were working on assassinating Castro. But before they could, the Mafia organized Dallas for the Kennedy administration's concerted anti-organized crime efforts. I believe the Mob was involved -- but only because the CIA had contracted (through the Robert Maheu--Johnny Rosselli connection) their services to give Fidel the ziggy.

A few other big things I'll try and get into in detail later this noche:

1. The Mafia couldn't order the Secret Service to stand down.

2. The Mafia couldn't order a last-minute change to the motorcade route to pass in front of the Texas School Book Depository.

3. The Mafia couldn't order the CIA and FBI to lie about the phony Oswalds running around the United States and Mexico.

The CIA has done all it can to lie, cover-up and blame others for their role in Dallas. What burns me is that most of the agency is filled with good people. The crooks are led by Bush and Co, such as Porter "Operation 40" Goss.

PS: I remember you telling me your dad met JFK, Stephanie. Your family knows what our nation and world lost on that terrible day. Because of one man's death 41 years ago, our world today is a much sadder and war-filled place.

it on this one.
However, one of the good things about him is when he realizes a mistake he admits it.

I haven't looked at the book, this is only from a conversation I had with a friend who read it, so I don't know the answer to your points. I will ask him.

Oliver Stone's "JFK" asks all the right questions about the "the mafia did it theory" (referenced in "JFK2 - The Bush connection").

JFK II: The Bush Connection
http://madcowpolitics.com/jfk2bb.wmv

It's particularly interesting because it spends a lot of time on the network and the background behind the assasination.

From the FBI "warning" at the beginning on, it is outstanding work. I wish more people knew about it.

The only ones I wish don't see it are the members of President Kennedy's family. There are some things in it that are just too painful for them to bear watching.

For them, I say that we will not forget, never give up following the trail of the guilty, and will work to restore Justice in America.

you're very welcome

It shows how the BEEF were involved.

I've watched 23 minutes of it. God....

I need to talk about this movie...

Your work pegs these treasonous NAZI bedwetting bastids for what they are.

Regarding the original article: From what I've seen, the article is a translation from Spanish into Brazilian into English. It's got a few problems, apart from J Edgar (Edward) Hoover and Prescott (Preston) Bush. What it does do, is spell out how we got to know what Poppy was up to in the Bay of Pigs Thing.

Speaking of which:

you have to start with Operation Northwoods first. That's what I found. Poppy Bush is an evil bastard. Nixon knew. Why else was he so paranoid about Kennedy and lied about where he was like Poppy?

Tragedy for the Kennedy family.

Tragedy for the country.

A boondoggle for the Bush Family Evil Empire.



These traitors are some serious men. And they're seriously afraid of the Truth.

Military-Industrial-Intelligence Complex Wanted War: NORTHWOODS was their means to their objective:

First would be war with Cuba, then their "Final Solution" with the Soviet Union.

The survivors, if any, supposedly would be free.

...I found in my JFK file.

Sorry about the typos, I'm trying to figure out the source. The content sure fits here.



It's a footnote from somewhere. May it help seal some traitor's bad name.

sad isn't it

makes those dlc threads seem trivial...

Which is where traitors belong.

As for the rest of us, we foot their bill and serve as their cannon fodder.



The BFEE. In business since 22 November 1963.

I'd say, "Earlier than that." Probably since FDR died.

The day JFK was murdered, George Herbert Walker Bush told the FBI he had a suspect. Too bad he reported it an hour after the fact. BTW: Poppy was in Dallas on 22 November 1963.



Here's what J Edgar Hoover and "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency" talked about a week later:



Source:

http://www.internetpirate.com/bush.htm

Please forgive me for repeating myself, JennasLiver. I know this is old hat to you, but for too many DUers and Americans the Bush-JFK Assassination connection is news.

that I read how Bush Sr. was partying with Saudi Royals on one of their yachts.

Birds of a feather, eh, AntiFascist?



Nice people read the Wall Street Journal, too.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html




and from the Wall Street Journal article:



More about Mr. Bath here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/11/6/61854/9150

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x147458
thread title (1-15-06): The Bush family, the Cuban mafia and the Kennedy assassination

Lots of comments there too.

My bad. I'd've changed things a bit, if I'd remembered the original post.

Seeing how we're here, there's no reason not to bring up some of the past that bears on the present:



Dulles lied to JFK regarding the Bay of Pigs, telling the young President that the plan would work, the Cuban people would rise up against the commie oppressor Fidel. Never happened. So, Dulles got fired over the Bay of Pigs. Then LBJ appointed him to the Warren Commission

The terrible secrets these people took to their graves! But I do believe that some day the truth will be exposed.

I didn't intend anything negative by giving a link to the other thread - I just want ALL the comments about the topic to be reachable, because as you know great things come out in comments.

You might have some interest in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x353591
thread title (2-7-06 GD): COMPILATION: My own list of TOP JANUARY THREADS - add your own! (long)

As I explain there, I never intended to share this thread list, but what the hey. It's very unwieldy in its present form, of course, but I'm thinking of reorganizing into carefully considered categories and trying to stir up interest in a "IMPORTANT THREADS OF THE WEEK" feature in the Research Forum. These could then be amalgamated into "IMPORTANT THREADS OF THE MONTH." I am hoping that other people will put in important ones that aren't there to begin with. I feel that the lack of a browsable archiving feature is the single biggest flaw in the mostly fine DU format.

chilling! I'd seen it before, but forgotten. If we had a real media, it would be
common knowledge that we're dealing with all the same people that have wanted to
destroy this country for the last 40 odd years.

Not from Octafish or any of our other SANE members, but...yeah. Those of you have have been paying attention know that we have some folks around these boards who think the "person" who killed Kennedy...I can't even type it. It's too embarrassing for them. Let's just say they're a little confused about what decade it is. And the difference between reality and their own sick fantasies.

Thanks, Octa! Your threads remind me that not everything is dead or destroyed.

Someone in the U.S. Government went to great lengths to make Oswald the patsy. That shows me who the the real assassins were -- and are.

Here's more light:



PS: Thanks for your reply, BlueIris. You have no idea how much knowing you and so many give a damn.

was the exact opposite of who "history" has officially recorded him as being. It's one of the sad things about the entire affair, in my opinion. He was on loan from one agency to another, showing a degree of coordination between those dark forces involved.

From Tarpley and Chaitkin:

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography

by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin

CHAPTER VIII-b - THE BAY OF PIGS AND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION


EXCERPT...

4. The Iran-contra affair, which became a public scandal during October-November 1986, several of whose central figures, such as Felix Rodriguez, were also veterans of the Bay of Pigs.

George Bush's role in both Watergate and the October surprise/Iran-contra complex will be treated in detail at later points in this book. Right now it is important to see that thirty years of covert operations, in many respects, form a single continuous whole. This is especially true in regard to the dramatis personae. Georgie Anne Geyer points to the obvious in a recent book: "...an entire new Cuban cadre now emerged from the Bay of Pigs. The names Howard Hunt, Bernard Barker, Rolando Martinez, Felix Rodriguez and Eugenio Martinez would, in the next quarter century, pop up, often decisively, over and over again in the most dangerous American foreign policy crises. There were Cubans flying missions for the CIA in the Congo and even for the Portuguese in Africa; Cubans were the burglars of Watergate; Cubans played key roles in Nicaragua, in Irangate, in the American move into the Persian Gulf." 2 Felix Rodriguez tells us that he was infiltrated into Cuba with the other members of the "Grey Team" in conjunction with the Bay of Pigs landings; this is the same man we will find directing the contra supply effort in central American during the 1980's, working under the direct supervision of Don Gregg and George Bush. 3 Theodore Shackley, the JM/WAVE station chief, will later show up in Bush's 1979-80 presidential campaign.

To a very large degree, such covert operations (and the great political scandals attendant upon them) have drawn upon the same pool of personnel. They are a significant extent the handiwork of the same crowd. It is therefore revealing to extrapolate forward and backward in time the individuals and groups of individuals who appear as the cast of characters in one scandal and compare them with the cast of characters for the other scandals, including the secondary ones that have not been enumerated here. Howard Hunt, for example, shows up as a confirmed part of the overthrow of the Guatemalan government of Jacopo Arbenz in 1954, as an important part of the chain of command in the Bay of Pigs, as a person repeatedly accused of having been in Dallas on the day Kennedy was shot, and as one of the central figures of Watergate. (One wonders what secrets, after all, were contained in Howard Hunt's safe, the contents of which were so conventiently "deep sixed" by FBI Director Patrick Gray.)

George Bush is demonstrably one of the most important protagonists of the Watergate scandal, and was the overall director of Iran-contra. Since he appears especially in Iran-contra in close proximity to Bay of Pigs holdovers, it is surely legitimate to wonder when his association with those Bay of Pigs Cubans might have started.

1959 was the year that Bush started operating out of his Zapata Offshore headquarters in Houston; it was also the year that Fidel Castro seized power in Cuba. Officially, as we have seen, George was now a businessman whose work took him at times to Louisiana, where Zapata had offshore drilling operations. George must have been a frequent visitor to New Orleans. Because of his family's estate on Jupiter Island, he would also have been a frequent visitor to the Hobe Sound area. And then, there were Zapata Offshore drilling operations in the Florida Strait. On all of these activities, the official "red Studebaker" biographical material and the Zapata Offshore annual reports are extremely cryptic.

The Jupiter Island connection and father Prescott's Brown Brothers, Harriman/Skull and Bones networks are doubtless the key. Jupiter Island meant Averell Harriman, Robert Lovett, C. Douglas Dillon and other Anglophile financiers who had directed the US intelligence community long before there had been a CIA at all. And, in the back yard of the Jupiter Island Olympians, and under their direction, a powerful covert operations base was now being assembled, in which George Bush would have been present at the creation as a matter of birthright.

During 1959-60, Allen Dulles and the Eisenhower Administration began to assemble in south Florida the infrastructure for covert action against Cuba. This was the JM/WAVE capability, later formally constituted as the CIA Miami station. JM/WAVE was an operational center for the Eisenhower regime's project of staging an invasion of Cuba using a secret army of anti-Castro Cuban exiles organized, armed, trained, transported, and directed by the CIA. The Cubans, called Brigade 2506, were trained in secret camps in Guatemala, and they had air support from B-26 bombers based in Nicaragua. This invasion was crushed by Castro's defending forces in less than three days.

Before going along with the plan so eagerly touted by Allen Dulles, Kennedy had established the pre-condition that under no circumstances whatsoever would there be direct intervention by US military forces against Cuba. On the one hand, Dulles had assured Kennedy that the news of the invasion would trigger an insurrection which would sweep Castro and his regime away. On the other, Kennedy had to be concerned about provoking a global thermonuclear confrontation with the USSR, in the eventuality that N.S. Khrushchev decided to respond to a US Cuban gambit by, for example, cutting off US access to Berlin.

CONTINUED...

http://newsmine.org/archive/cabal-elite/families/bush-dynasty/george-bush-bay-of-pigs-jfk.txt

is also being hosted by Google!Another excellent documentary!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q=loose+change

Can you imagine how big a swing to the right there would have been had the people found out cuba/soviets were behind this?

Can you imagine WAR WITH THE SOVIETS?

There are some things the public just can't be let in on right away otherwise you get something like a NUCLEAR WAR.

The CIA told the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald had ties to Cuba and the Soviet Union and had met with their top assassin in Mexico City. One problem: That never happened. Here's the photo of the guy the CIA said was "Oswald."



Details here:

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Cuba_and_the_Kennedy_Assassination

http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/lopezrpt/contents.htm

http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/04th_Issue/lho.mc.html

These treasonous turds WANTED war. They wanted war over Cuba. They wanted war with the Soviets.

Gee. In his time in office, all JFK did was work for peace.

Since his death, most presidents have done all they can for empire -- which means war.

I see nothing to be glad about.

:patriot:

A week after his assassination, LBJ signs NSAM 273 stating the US would do whatever it takes to preserve South Vietnam.

Early the next year, the Gulf of Tonkin incident is STAGED -- Operation NORTHWOODS without all the killing -- and we're into Vietnam and there's no turning back.

Seeing how The New York Times, Washington Post and ABCCNNBCBSFauxNoiseNutwork never bring this stuff up is why I thank the Good Lord I've got DU Friends like you, ngGale!

Background:



Thanks for giving a damn, ngGale!

As some of his reward for killing Che.

We weren't set up to believe our government could work like this in school, were we? That's probably why the biggest babies among us can't let go of those first impressions made in childhood.



They're reading Lynn Cheney's history rewrite, America. Can you imagine how our history will read, after right-wing ideologues completely overhaul it?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks to Octafish for the excellent opening post. It's absolutely not to be missed.

Remember the guy who appeared before the Florida judge?



Florida has been very, very good to the Bush Crime Family.

It's been very, very good for Felix Rodriguez, a made man.

we didn't get here over night. There's a continuity between the current administration and the Kennedy assassinations. Crime and national security are so tightly bound together. This link talks about Abramoff and Lansky. Madcow also had some good reads on Cunningham that highlight the CIA aspects.

http://www.madcowprod.com/02072006.html

Hopsicker, too.

Here's some background from the late, great Mae Brussell:



Thank you for giving a damn and seeing how these turds have a historical influence onAmerican politics, donkeyotay.



"What monsters?"

People, even if confronted with massive and documented evidence, will reject any theory that would threaten their comfortable world-view.

Example:

Yesterday I went to a hearing to try to stop paperless, touchscreen voting machines from being rammed down our throats here in Pittsburgh.

Before the meeting, I talked to some of the other activists. Now, they agreed that:

1.) The Federal Government, especially Republican US Congress, was jamming these things down our throats.

2.) That a Voter Verified Paper Trail was being prevented at the state level on a Republican partisan basis.

3.) That Diebold has lied on several occasions about the security of their machines.

And on and on.

But guess what? I was the only one there that believed that this rapid introduction of questionable voting equipment was part of a plot to neutralize Democracy in the United States. "You're giving them too much credit" was the most common response.

And that's what we're up against.

that neoconservative Republicans are arranging things so that accidents can happen. For example, there may not be a coordinated plan to neutralize democracy (at least few Republicans would even consider or admit to this argument) but there is documented evidence which shows that if hackers make the attempt, then they can easily break the security of these systems. So are we going to just sit back and use the honor system when it comes to our democracy? We've already seen, especially in the 2000 election, how fiercely Bush supporters will pull every trick they can when the race is close. By the 2004 election, they had time to refine their methods.

In the conflict with Castro, the militarization of China, the arming of the mujahedeen, and the ability to wage preemptive wars...again they've pulled every trick they can think of to get where we are today.

When the hearing actually started, I had the good sense to not mention that the evidence is clear that elections ARE being rigged, just that they COULD be rigged.

But if you peek behind the curtain, which is Octafish's M.O., it's clear that a small group of wealthy, extreme RW figures are conducting a magnificent puppet show that has replaced what used to be the American experiment in democracy. May it rest in peace.

Your problem reaching people concerned with clean elections is most alarming. In communiations, I've found it's almost impossible to bring in alien ideas without first going through a process of indoctrination -- not brainwashing, but rather teaching.

The ancient Greeks called this rhetoric -- the study of pursuasive speech. In marketing communications, it's building a bridge from what is known, using common ground and language. Once that basic understanding is established, we can introduce the new terms and take them to the promised land.

It's almost as if the problem is destroying the world view our holographic minds create. Over time, we build a picture of our universe and we believe this mental contruct matches reality. When a new piece of information comes in -- especially when it doesn't fit with the preconceived notions -- is almost automatically rejected.

Good stuff on rhetoric:

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/

Here's a bit on the holographic universe:

http://www.crystalinks.com/holographic.html

Thank you for never giving up, Junkdrawer. When it comes to democracy, you are doing the heavy lifting.

:toast:

The Nation (2-20-06), there is an article by Max Holland, "The JFK Lawyer's Conspiracy." At the end of the first paragraph, Holland writes, "The combined efforts of these lawyers produced an imperfect report in September, 1964, although its fundamental findings have never been seriously impeached."

Hopefully, The Nation will publish my brief response, which seriously impeaches the findings of the Warren Commission in four sentences.

I hope the publication has the integrity to publish responsible criticisms and corrections.

What trash!

Regarding The Nation: Those turds haven't said "Boo" about treason since 22 November 1963.

I think they're scared.


What somebody observed about The Nation's funding:



That's probably old hat to you, H20 Man. It's news to most of America -- especially the progressive majority.

BTW: I've been to your blogspot. Gee. I fee like Voltaire when he wrote Rousseau:

"One feels like crawling on all fours after reading your work."

Alas, I repeat myself...

moment of awakening on this .... Tip had believed the Warren Report, and felt those who questioned it were fools, until he shared a meal with Dave Powers and Kenny O'Donnell in 1968. One assumes from his telling of the story that the men were together after the death of RFK, just two months after MKL was killed. The topic turned to Dallas, and both Kennedy aides told how they knew two shots came from the Grassy Knoll. They told the FBI investigators, who pressured them to lie to the Warren Commission for the good of the family and country. When he was writing his book years later, Kenny had passed away, but Tip checked with Powers. The truth had not changed.

I've mentioned before that when my oldest son was in high school, his social studies teacher savaged the movie "JFK." When a couple students debated him, he tossed out a challenge, some nonsense that implied he could easily debunk any theory that any student brought to class. My son brought Tip's book, and showed the teacher page 211. The teacher refused to let my son mention it in class. Of course, outside class my son showed other students, and the teacher was fully discredited.

Either the WC or O'Neill was correct about the truth about Dallas. The WC was based on a foundation of purposeful lies, while Tip exposed those lies. Two shots from the Grassy Knoll can only mean a conspiracy. Pressuring eye witnesses to lie is part of that conspiracy.

:kick:

a copy of it .... but any investigation that requires two eye witnesses being pressured to lie "for the good of the country" is absolutely compromised.

Oswald's killer Jack Ruby has been seen numerous time with "Raoul", MLK's killer. Both are mafia.


Jury rules King assassination a conspiracy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=386618&mesg_id=386618

Here's the letter:



Source:

http://www.oilempire.us/cointelpro.html

The Big Picture:

http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cointel.htm

The CIA hired the Mafia to hit Castro. They used Howard Hughes/Richard Nixon's main man, Robert Maheu.

And to think so many DUers don't think their government is capable of conspiracy.

Going back and re-reading the 2005 SOTU address, I found this quote:

> The liberation of Europe from fascism was only a dream -- until it was achieved.


http://www.c-span.org/executive/transcript.asp?cat=current_event&code=bush_admin&year=2005

The old unindicted co-conspirator probably was thinking "perpetrated."

From a BBC programme:



Source:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/americas/1848157.stm