Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Juan Cole on today's revelation that US reconstruction in Iraq is ending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:41 PM
Original message
Juan Cole on today's revelation that US reconstruction in Iraq is ending
Juan Cole on today's revelation that US reconstruction in Iraq is ending, according to the Washington Post.

The Washington Post reports that the $18 billion voted by the US Congress for Iraqi reconstruction is mostly committed or spent, with large amounts diverted to security, prisons and trials. The administration does not intend to ask for any more. I'd say this is a good bellwether of administration intentions. If the US were staying in Iraq in a big way, and still hoping to make a significant place for the multinationals there, it would have to bite the bullet and continue to try to do reconstruction. If the Bush administration is throwing in the towel, then whether Iraqis have enough electricity really isn't its problem any more.


http://www.juancole.com/2006/01/guerrillas-target-police-all-over-iraq.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200370.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. The BFEE only wants enough electricity to pump OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only place that needs to be habitable--is the Green Zone...
America doesn't care if families have electricity, water--or homes for that matter.

They only care about running their operations from the protected confines of the "Green Zone"--and
ensuring that they have a significant military presence from which to conduct their other Middle Eastern war operations.

What do they care if schools are open? Or if the Iraqi economy is running? Or if people are living in tents?

Abandoning reconstruction sends a clear signal--that these neocon thugs are not even pretending anymore. They are operating militarily in Iraq--at this point. I think the "but we're bringing them freedom" rhetoric will stop soon. We're not even attempting to give the appearance of helping these people. We're destroying the country.

I'll also say that something SIGNIFICANT and MAJOR must be in the works. To abandon reconstruction means that these slimy bastards have something up their sleeves that will make the American public indifferent to the Iraqi reconstruction--that we promised. Undoubtedly, the neocon plan will involve fear, dependence on them and propping Bush up as a leader.

I say...be afraid. And be prepared for the worst from these third-class, warped thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. and those permanent military bases....
and all along the oil pipelines. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nor do they care...
about Iraq's standard of living, schools, etc...
It's all about what $ can be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. That helps explain
all of the right-wing propaganda about how wonderful it is over there - as if it's all fixed.


More from Cole:


"The political and propaganda effectiveness of the guerrilla movement is demonstrated in the article. Apparently, the US has been deprived of any credit for any of its good works in Iraq (70% of Iraqis don't even know about them), and has been deprived of the good will that might have come from getting the services functioning and the oil flowing freely.

There is an error in the WaPo article, which quotes Iraqi oil production as 2 billion barrels a day a day. That should be 2 million, and will no doubt be corrected on the web. But that still isn't right. They weren't able to do more than an average of 1.8 million in 2005, last I knew, and in December it was less. 200,000 barrels of petroleum a day is significant enough so that it can't just be rounded up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. They've been releasing the "Most Wanted". (remember the poker deck?)
Freeing a group of politically well-connected Baath party officials, without so much as a public hearing to allow grievances to be filed, strongly hints that the US is attempting to set the groundwork for another dictatorship.

Iraq's Most Wanted freed without charges or public hearing.

For all the fear-mongering about Saddam's inner-circle, such as "Ms. Anthrax" (5 of hearts) in the lead-up to the Iraqi War, one would think that they would at least be held for trail with their boss instead of getting a US-funded flight to Jordan.

If the Iraqi War was supposed to be about neutralizing the threat of proliferating WMDs, why would the government have released Rihab Rashid Taha (aka "Dr Germ"), who in 1999 was named as "One of the worlds most dangerous women" by the Defense Intelligence Agency. (DIA) In September of 2004 Taha was important enough to Iraqi insurgents that they kidnapped Kenneth Bigly, and then executed him when their demands that she be released were ignored.

Well, she's free now. It's possible those insurgents finally found a hostage that was valuable enough to the US to grant her freedom.<snip>


Entire article here: www.brainshrub.com/iraq-most-wanted


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. wonder what ever happened to bushjrs "Al Qeada Chart" that he gleefully
explained to the public, in the terms of a grade-schooler, that he kept - and exed out their faces when each was caught...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. you've got to be kidding. this is a weak hope
Edited on Mon Jan-02-06 03:27 PM by bigtree
right in the Post report is a breakdown of millions that was diverted to other programs. Rumsfeld said just the other day that trillions are unaccounted for. There's plenty of money to be diverted into empire building there. The article pegs the main funnel, USAID, and funding through the foreign aid bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's about the election in November...
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC