Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want the local sheriff to explain his OBVIOUS WHITEWASH. Had this been a

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:29 PM
Original message
I want the local sheriff to explain his OBVIOUS WHITEWASH. Had this been a
liberal dem then the sheriff would be grilled about the bullshit so-called investigation. I want explanations of why procedure wasn't followed. I want to know why they allowed the secret service to turn away the chief deputy. I want to know why they concluded the investigation BEFORE interviewing all parties involved. I want to know why they claim alchohol wasn't involved when they didn't speak to anybody until 14 abd half hours after the dick shot a man in the face from probably less than 30 yards.

Where is our liberal press? Fascist Corporate control of this country is complete. If they can't live by the rule of law then why should we? Seriously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oscarguy Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well Stated, Nothing to Add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. he babbled some horseshit about being friends with the ranchowners
and some hooha about it being a small community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because they'd shoot your ass if you attempted anything other than
total compliance. That would be the primary reason that springs to mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought the sheriff didn't get to talk to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. We do not yet have his official report--only the Press release from
his office on smoking gun (along with the Wildlife Report)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fascist Corporate control NOT "complete"
If it was, absolutely NOTHING about this event would be public knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. For the record, Kleberg County is heavily Democrat
I'd be stunned if the sheriff, Ed Mata, was a Republican. The DA, all the state reps and other office holders are Democrats, and in the 2002 state elections Kleberg County voted for the whole slate of Democratic candidates, overwhelmingly in most cases. Ron Kirk got 64% of the vote, for instance, in 2002. Many of their Dems run unopposed.

Just in case you're wondering about a political bias.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for that- I was indeed wondering. Unfortunately I read here
that the sheriff stated he was friends with the Armstrongs and his actions, or lack thereod thus far seem to indicate whitewash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Probably does have friends
The Armstrongs are Republican, but they are also rich power brokers, and no doubt they would build alliances with whomever was in power, so the sheriff probably knows them, as would other elected officials in the county.

I don't think there's so much a whitewash as there is a simple case that the sheriff saw no need to stir up trouble over. Now it looks huge, but then it's a basic hunting accident on private property. The sheriff shows up, speaks to the few witnesses he can, hears the same story from everyone. There's not much for him to make a case out of. As for him not having access to Cheney for half a day, that might have raised his suspicions about drinking, but aside from shooting it out with the Secret Service, who would have jurisdiction over Cheney and might even shoot the sheriff if he tried to get to Cheney against their permission, there wasn't much he could do, and there wasn't much reason to doubt what he was told.

And from what I've read, I'm not sure we've seen the sheriff's report yet on this. He might mention suspicions about alcohol. But without evidence of it, he can't really say Cheney was drunk.

Now, if Whittington dies, and I sincerely hope he doesn't, the case is immediately more serious, and then the investigation gets more thorough. I just don't see the sheriff as the problem right now. I see Cheney as making the biggest PR blunder I've ever seen a president or VP make. Right now, he looks dumber than Dan Quayle. I would say he looks dumber than Bush, but no, Bush looks even more clueless, like he doesn't even have control over what his VP or his own press secretary decide to tell people.

Poor Bush. One heartbeat away from the presidency, and that heartbeat belongs to a sick, stupid man who may have just shot himself in the head.

And tomorrow, the Katrina report, and I've heard rumors that more Abu Ghraib photos may be released. Poor Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC