Further proof, Saddam had no intension's on using WMD's against us!

In no ways am I being an apologist for Saddam Hussein. But, this administration has sent our innocent people off to fight in a war that should have never happened. How can people still say that this was the right thing to do? And, What is the just cause?

Reading the transcript from ABC's Nightline, it says:

<<snip>>

"Terrorism is coming. I told the Americans a long time before Aug. 2 and told the British as well … that in the future there will be terrorism with weapons of mass destruction." Saddam goes on to say such attacks would be difficult to stop. "In the future, what would prevent a booby-trapped car causing a nuclear explosion in Washington or a germ or a chemical one?" But he adds that Iraq would never do such a thing. "This is coming, this story is coming but not from Iraq."

Link:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Investigation/story?id=1616996

That "Smoking Gun" went over pretty well, didn't it?

to sate the appetites of the fucking false patriots and their fucking idiotic idea that bush is a good man who only wants to strip our freedoms to make us secure. Hussein always talked like a badass; his modus operandi. Make others think I'm more powerful than I am. But we knew that was wrong. I do my best to piss off conservatives and probably the best way I have been able to do that is say:

When President Clinton took office Iraq had WMD, when he left office Iraq did not. Makes their little scum brains explode.

Operations Southern and Northern Watch, maintenance of the no fly zone and weapons inspectors freely scurrying about Iraq during the peaceful and prosperous 90's.

I'm not a stickler usually, but it IS your subject line.

It is too late for me to edit it.

My bad!