Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers urges White House to review Arab port takeover

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:20 PM
Original message
Lawmakers urges White House to review Arab port takeover
Lawmakers urges White House to review Arab port takeover
Critics contend deal could affect national security

Thursday, February 16, 2006; Posted: 12:32 p.m. EST (17:32 GMT)

(AP) -- U.S. lawmakers formally asked the Bush administration Thursday to reconsider its approval of a sale giving a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

The lawmakers, including four senators and three House members, sharply criticized the UAE as inconsistent in its support of U.S. anti-terrorism efforts.

They also said the country was a key transfer point for shipments of nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya and was one of only three nations that had recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government.

"Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with a dubious record on terrorism is a homeland security and commerce accident waiting to happen," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York. "The administration needs to take another look at this deal."

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/16/congress.ports.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. i think the Wh tod them to take a hike: see here
but not sure if earlier or later.

Thu Feb-16-06 02:00 PM
Original message
White House Defends Port Operations Sale


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060216/ap_on_go_pr_wh/port... ;_ylt=AnjMMsKpjJuR6n3cNoE7JfID5gcF;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--

White House Defends Port Operations Sale

AP - 13 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration on Thursday rebuffed criticism about potential security risks of a $6.8 billion sale that gives a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

Lawmakers asked the White House to reconsider the deal.

The sale to state-owned Dubai Ports World was "rigorously reviewed" by a U.S. committee that considers security threats when foreign companies seek to buy or invest in American industry, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the
Treasury Department, took into account an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed the sale did not present any problems, the department said.

The public defense of the secretive committee, which reviews hundreds of such deals each year, came in response to criticism about the purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Your link is broken.
What is the name of the company? Has anyone researched it? Is Osama the CEO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was giving port control to the British a better idea?
When the bloody pluperfect hell did THAT happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. 1999 to 2001
# USA: Acquired ITO – multiport stevedore/terminal operator, June 1999.
...
# New Orleans, USA: Acquired Gulf Services, also in May 2000.
...
# New York, USA: November 2000, entered into joint venture (PNCT) with P&O Nedlloyd in Port of New York and New Jersey with terminal capacity of 1M TEUs.
...
# Baltimore, USA: Awarded 6 year contract to manage two facilities in May 2001.


http://portal.pohub.com/portal/page?_pageid=36,1,36_31151:36_32105&_dad=pogprtl&_schema=POGPRTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I DON'T THINK ADMIRAL THAD ALLEN LOOKS WITH FAVOR ON THIS TRANASCTION
<>



AND NEITHER DOES "COASTIE"

<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oooh! we're urging them to "review it"! Oooh, like that'll scare 'em! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. If terrorism is a real problem, then this port control makes NO SENSE
Makes me question whether the terrorism thing is just all political theater to get us to give up our rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. MIHOP...MIHOP...MIHOP
Anyone who can't see that the administration is all but inciting them "Come on and ATTACK already" is either asleep or in a coma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How would MIHOP work?
I've heard the LIHOP theories, but not the MIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC