|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
PhilipShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:01 PM Original message |
Cheney has a full time DOCTOR around him 24/7--Medical malpractice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. who said it was on doctor's advice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Since we the taxpayers, are forced to pay for his medical care, shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. If we were permitted to do that, he would have been gone long ago, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yea, what was I thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Certainly it depends on what meds he's on, but in many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. You know how do we know that heart condition is for real? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. We're entitled to know his condition, not run his life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhilipShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I thought the same thing when I filed a bar complaint...they would laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That's a far different case, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhilipShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I was a party in 1967 but not given notice of the proceedings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thefool_wa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-17-06 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. its no real surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC