Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abortion: Always Make Them Think It Through

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:12 PM
Original message
Abortion: Always Make Them Think It Through
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 12:21 PM by rucky
So, anti-choicer, you got your wish and a first trimester fetus now has the same rights as any citizen.
You've succeeded in outlawing abortion. Now what?

How do you prevent unwanted pregnancy? Abstinence and...? That's it?! No birth control? No sex education in schools? Oh, adoption, too. Sure, lots of parents want to adopt - there's a two-year waiting list in some places for a healthy white baby. Would you adopt a nonwhite baby? With medical problems? Birth defects from incest? (and you don't want gay people to adopt, either?) Oh, yes, I'm sure someone will adopt all those children. Otherwise, we have welfare and child services to support the mom and kid in the meantime...oh, that's right, you're against welfare, too.

Suppose a woman has a now-made-illegal abortion. How long should she go to jail for? Does life in prison seem fair? Death penalty? After all, it is murder, now. Not life? A lesser term? For a lesser crime, I suppose. (hypocracy alert) So what's fair? Why do you make that distinction (between abortion and murder)?

So you've removed all of the options for women to prevent unwanted pregnancies except abstinence, and have no plan at all to deal with the consequences if your (proven uneffective) abstinence plan doesn't work? They're on their own, eh? Doesn't this basically amount to punishing women (and their children) for not having the type of sex you want them to have. How did you decide that, by the way? The "right" type of sex? As long as we're getting personal, here...

Maybe you should think all this through a bit more before you propose a ban on abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow nice rant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!
:applause: Well stated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The penalties for abortion always screws them up.
There's nobody really willing to follow the rhetoric of murder and put women in prison for life. But make it into a parking ticket violation and the huge moralistic fervor seems, well, as if it was a political exercise from the get go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Prison for life? We're talking the death penalty in 34 states!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. But I bet you that they wouldn't have a problem with something in
the middle, say a 5-10 year prison term. Still doesn't address the hypocrisy of being treated differently than a regular murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. If an embryo = person, how can they justify 5 year sentences?
That's bullshit. If abortion is murder, then the weasels should have the courage of their conviction to support life imprisonment or the death penalty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
51. I have repeatedly seen statistics suggesting that the mean term
for murder is around 8 years. Given that 5 years isn't out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. But you wouldn't make the maximum into the mean.
or vice versa. That would have to admit that people who commit contract killings and get the death penalty would be somehow worse than the abortionist who repeatedly performs the procedure for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. actually the post mentioned the women
not the abortion provider. I think far more pro life people are willing to see long sentences for repeat providers of abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. And what about women who have abortions repeatedly and
or without any pressure? Yes, some of the anti abortion people say they want the doctors. But they are quickly going to come up against do it yourselfers, and "unsympathetic" women. It's going to blow. I think that there are going to be so many loopholes, so much inconsistency, that the entire anti abortion effort is going to be seen as unfair and illogical even if one thinks abortion is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. treating providers and women differently
would be hardly any different than treating dealers and users of drugs differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. But that's decriminalizing use.
They are either a lesser class of criminal OR it is decriminalized. The latter makes NO sense in the context of abortion as murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. It makes some sense
in that often times they view women as victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. They'd LIKE to assert that
The anti choice people are working hard to avoid the political disaster of punishing women as murderers. So they are victims of the doctors, or at least of circumstances. Heck, it fits other stereotypes of women as needing guidance and susceptible to the charms of bad men.

But it won't work. It won't work because IF it's a homicide, it's got to be at least three to five for manslaughter no matter how much pressure the woman is under. In other words, letting women off is inconsistent with the very argument why abortion must be made illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. actually they were being quoted here
as favoring 5 years. So that would fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #58
72. It really is no different and
my question is: How can they call it "murder" but not want punishment for the woman? If abortion is "murder", and a woman willingly goes to an abortionist and participates, how can they NOT consider her an "accomplice"? The whole thing is so stupid. They want to call it murder but they don't want to punish the woman? I don't see how they can have it both ways. The thing is, when they think of the doctors, they think "murderer" but when they think of their own precious daughter getting an abortion, somehow she is not so guilty. This is why I always ask them "If you think abortion is murder, and then you find out your daughter willingly had one, how long do you think she should be in prison? Or if you think only the doctor should be punished, then what happens if the girl does it herself with drugs or a coat hanger? ( :scared: ) Should she get capital punishment or what sort of prison sentence?" That one always makes them think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. I bet they would/
Already, they can't put ANY penalty on the woman. But you are right, it's not nearly matching the rhetoric. That, plus the non enforcment and unwillingness to go after women going out of state, is going to make fundie heads explode.

I have to be careful. As much as I am going to enjoy the democratic gains when abortion is back in the political sphere, I don't want to give the idea that I wouldn't rather have the constitutional right reaffirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #48
73. adios
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. What is the history here?
what did they do in the past? Did they put women in jail or just the doctors? I was too young to remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. I'm not sure. I'm too young, too.
The history I know is seeing Poppy Bush being asked in a news conference about the penalities for abortion and having to TAKE A DAY TO THINK ABOUT IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
70. As far as I know...
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 08:25 AM by colinmom71
the police only went after the doctor or whomever performed the abortion. Though the woman was never targeted for prosecution, it was not unheard of for police officers to delay or even outright deny women medical care until the woman offered testimony to lead investigators to the person who performed the abortion. Keep in mind that police were usually only contacted about an illegal abortion if the woman was having complications from a botched procedure...

But then, abortion laws pre-Roe weren't predicated upon the notion of the fetus being granted legal personhood status. Abortion laws in the US actually began in the early 1800's as laws intended to protect women from accidental poisoning from unstable herbal "remedies" and from then very dangerous surgical attempts that often ended in the woman dying from infection or hemhoraging. But by the 1960's, the proliferation of antibiotics and improved surgical techniques reduced the statistical risks of surgical abortion to being far less risky than the statistical potential for health problems or mortality due to pregnancy and/or childbirth complications. Ergo, the main proferred compelling cause for pre-Roe laws that proscribed abortion was virtually eliminated.

But what we're seeing now are attempts to invalidate the legal status of abortion based on protecting the fetus as having equal status of personhood to the pregnant woman. The problem there is, if abortion is to be illegal based on the notion that it is unjustified killing of a now person (fetus), then it must be considered a homicide count. And not just any homicide count - it would have to be a count of murder - either murder of first or second class (usually defined at the state level as premeditated, deliberate killing) or as felony murder (usually defined as a homicide occuring during the commission of a felony crime - the abortion).

If the abortion is defined as murder, then state prosecutors have a legal duty to prosecute both the abortion provider *and* the woman seeking to procure the abortion. Why? Because then the woman has committed either conspiracy to murder or "murder-for-hire", a crime that often holds the same or a similar penalty as the murder itself. The reluctance that most pro-lifers have towards prosecuting or penalizing the woman will become irrelevant under the very same laws they want in place based on their idea of fetal personhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. Thanks! Great summary. What I was trying to say. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. dupe.
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 12:17 PM by Inland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. It all boils down to this one piece.
"They're on their own, eh? Doesn't this basically amounts to punishing women (and their children) for not having the type of sex you want them to have"

That's exactly how a right wing extremist sees things. It's black and white, you had a baby, you don't want it, now you must be punished by keeping it. If you don't live up to their "moral" code, then you deserve punishment until you see things the way you "should".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Here are the other countries who punish women who break moral code:
Saudi Arabia, the Taliban, Togo... off the top of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Funny how those similarities pop up in my mind too.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. this sums up perfectly the rw playbook on the subject
i think the democratic party has to not potray this subject as a womens right to do what she wants with her body, but instead we should give ideas on how to prevent unwanted pregancies. birth control, sex education are good starts. you have the baby, then welfare laws should be made where keeping the baby is viable and if not yeah, then adoption should be an option to all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Something like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. THANKS FOR THE LINK!
perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Hey Mr. Pirate - have you been touched by His noodly appendage?
LOL! I like your name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please send your rant to this jerk running for Texas governor -
If he has his way, all women who have abortions would be executed. He's scary as hell and there's a lot of folks out there just like him:

http://www.larrykilgore.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yikes!!
"Larry has a passion for providing freedom to others."

NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Good grief! This is really scary! Did you read any of his FAQ's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Dating is not wise?!?!
From age 16 to 24 I dated and did not treat these ladies with respect. Physically I was virgin when I married at age 25, but I did not guard my heart. Dating is not wise!
I have watched pornography on the TV and computer. I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes. Ps101:3


I'd be :rofl: if it wasn't for the fact that there are too many men (mostly men) who are just like this weirdo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. It all comes down to him not getting laid in college.
now he's making Texas pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. ROFLMAO!
Of course, that's it!

Just think if some poor Texas co-ed had had one more drink and taken pity on the guy and suffered through it, we all wouldn't be suffering now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
75. Rucky, you are one smart Buckeye. Nice rant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. hey, at least he is consistent
if he really believes that abortion is premeditated murder, then he should say this.

I don't agree with him, on either point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. What a whackjob.
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. It's my understanding the they are targeting the doctors
that would perform the illegal abortion. Attacking the supply side rather than the demand side. Basically charge him or her with murder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
52. What a freak!
Wow. The Constitution means nothing to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Then you could ask the men
who they think they are going to have sex with. I mean really, that is a pretty steep punishment for the women. I, for one, think the consequences are just a bit too high myself to risk ever having sex. (tongue in my own cheek of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. and there's plenty of other governments that have been successful
in stopping premarital sex. right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Just fuck all those nutjobs
Women! Time to return to your roots. And I mean that literally.

There are veggies in the produce department and growing in a field or forest close to your home that will nullify this anti-choice atmosphere. That will nullify the need for birth control doled out as Wal-Mart sees fit. Learn about them.

Fuck these control freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. got any links?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. PM me N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alpizzy Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Do you have a link...
I would like to educate myself & others.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. PM Me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Research herbs that are classified as "Abortificants"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. AbortifacIENTS
Research and learning are good things. However, I do not recommend that anyone ever try one of these herbs without skilled supervision. You can get hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Oops! Thanks for the spellcheck!
:blush:

And also your note of caution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SledDriver Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. What if Mom doesn't eat right, or drinks, or does drugs...
and miscarries? Can that be construed as manslaughter?

What if she's pregnant and gets into a car accident?
Vehicular homicide?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Shades of "The Handmaid's Tale"
Logically, yes--that's exactly where this whole thing is headed. Women are going to become the property of the State. Thank God--all that freedom they used to have was just too terrifying. We should probably lock them all up in cages, just to be on the safe side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. G' on rucky!
:applause::woohoo::yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. They're control freaks...
...if they can't control what women can do and not do, they freak. The haven't thought about the incredibly flawed logistics of their controlling behavior or the abject hypocrisy in it. Just that they MUST CONTROL other people.

Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. They lack the ability to adapt to their environment...
And the fear is so intense, they try to make their environment adapt to them.

Not very Christian, IMO. If they truly had faith, they'd accept the world as God made it. To compensate for these two binds they've put themselves in, they use bits and pieces of religion as a means to control - somehow resolving those two basic flaws (at least in their own minds).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. You're right on the mark. They are afraid, because they are told things
are black and white. Their whole philosophy is based on a theory that requires you to remove all humanity from your thought process. Human beings are made in all shapes and sizes, beliefs, etc. Not one size fits all. Their beliefs require a one size fits all view and if it doesn't work, they smash the square peg into the round hole, because it just HAS TO FIT!

If they start to let in ideas other than what they are told, then their whole world crumbles. That would be a scary proposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. This rant does not speak to the average anti-abortion voter
/channelling my Catholic relatives:

The answer is REALLY EASY - just stop having sex outside of marriage! If everyone would just obey the Church's Teachings, you wouldn't have these problems. Or get married! That's what we did in our day!

If you ARE married, you should accept all the children that God decides to send to you, and He will find a way to feed them.

Or put the baby up for adoption - there are A LOT of couples that are looking for healthy white babies, and with all this abortion out there, they can't get one. With abortion outlawed, nice white infertile couples will be able to get a baby finally! (what we'll do with those pesky unwanted babies of color, I don't know. I try not to think about Black and Brown people. Maybe orphanages - we know a guy who grew up in an Catholic orphanage with the nuns and he turned out just fine. So there you go - adoption for white babies, orphanages for brown babies!!)

And we don't punish the sinning women - too many to put in jail. We punish the abortionist/murderers - put them to death and good riddance! (The Death penalty is okay - we ignore the Pope on that one). With all the abortionists dead, there won't be any abortion!

What's so difficult about all that?

/channeling off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yes and remember we have more important issues to fight
Abortion is just a women's issues and I don't like the whole debate so I fight for better progressive values. I just leave the fight to the luny feminists. The right will never take away abortion...mornining after pills...birth control pills. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
42. Will miscarriages be investigated now?
Is every miscarriage going to be investigated to determine if the woman intentionally caused it? Did she fall ON PURPOSE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. You do realize that falling isn't the only way to
have a miscarriage right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Of course. Why wouldn't they?
Every early termination would be like finding a body. Somebody is going to have to determine that it was "natural causes" and not a homicide. Think of how routine it is that "cause of death" is at least determined by a doctor. I expect that, in fact, doctors will be prosecuted if they don't report evidence of abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
43. oh hell - just remind them that their taxes will go up to pay for all
those new kids on welfare. They hate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Good point.
Tell them that if they're anti-choice, that they've just volunteered to have their taxes raised, b/c all those unwanted little ones are going to need daycare, schools, college, etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #49
68. won't work
they plan to defund daycare, schools, colleges, and probably "etc" too.

the unwanted children will need these things, but they won't get it from this new government. they wll live in povery and go to public schools that are more crowded and de-funded than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. Couple of thoughts
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 04:53 PM by oneighty
1. The blood father of the aborted child should also be put to death or other punishment equal to that of the woman he knocked up. Or maybe dismemberment for the guilty male as well.

2. As soon as the white people learn blacks and hispanics and yellow people are producing faster then they are then abortion will quickly become legal for 'Those of other than white'. Same goes if one is other than Christian.

That ought to cool it.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
57. i demand they think it thru. did yesterday with a friend. told her i
wanted answers. they have three decades to think about this so what do they have to say to me. because for three years i have been asking and i have yet to get an answer. all the stuff, the women that get one, how much jail. 4 kids at home, cant afford another, kids go into foster home? do we have welfare ready to take care of all the extra unwanted babies? are we ready to tell that ten year old that was raped by her father to have that baby, and who is going to take care of it? i want to know

she tells me i dont know.

not good enough,...... going to create a mess with no thought to take care of. she tells me, we cant always have the answer, like with social security and iraq war

no i tell her, that is only a repug position, go in and create a mess, leaving a bigger mess cause it isnt thought thru. in personal life, or business the adult thinks it thru, looks at different things that can happen and figure out plans to deal with. that is what the adult does. that is what our repugs do NOT do and it is about damn time we demand it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. "we can't always have the answer"
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 10:08 PM by Iris
Then why the HELL would we be making LAWS about something like this. The very thought of a woman - any age - being forced to deal 9 months of pregnancy and a year of recovery after being raped makes my stomach turn. And her answer is "we can't have all the answers?"

Well, guess what!?!?? We DO have all the answers - it's called history. People oughta study it once in a while so we can stop repeating mistake after mistake after mistake.

on edit:

oh and what ABOUT Social Security and IRAQ?????? It looks like we ARE getting all the answers - Bush and his cronies lied about weapons of mass destruction. There's loads of info. about Social Security and its status. Maybe she could read something and interpret it for herself once in a while.


:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left of center Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Very Good! You make them ponder the consequences of their
actions when then limit the options for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
64. They'll give 'wait until you're married' classes at school...
show the benefits of having sex after your married plus they'll make sure that young girls believe they can get pregnant french kissing. They'll stick with the oldies but goodies scare tactics that have done so well in keeping good girls from hitting the sack with their boyfriends before they get a ring on their finger. Only good comes from marriage between a man and a woman. Anything else is a sin and all that. :eyes:

And those young girls who shamelessly have sex and become pregnant will be shipped off to an old-fashioned unwed mothers' home. Those were the days. The babies of course will go to good christian white civilized folks.

The less than perfect babies...well, we can't talk about those.

Oh, and I should add, the class will be preceded by a prayer for guidance.

Problem solved.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

I really hate these people sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. then get me a minister, cuz I'm going to the prom! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Married women have abortions too
Interesting that the argument is always framed in terms of young unmarried women.
What about the woman with kids in college and high school, working to provide for the family.
An unwanted pregnancy could throw the family into deep financial trouble ( and physical danger for the mom as well) It happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
69. Let's go with the biblical punishment
If a man assaults a pregnant woman and she loses the baby, the woman's husband is due monetary compensation (nevermind the woman). If the assault results in loss of the baby and death of the woman, then you're talking about a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
71. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #71
78. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
76. The fundie answer to all of those questions is "not my problem"
unfortunately, many of the people you are talking about are not the "think it through" type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
77. Great post, rucky!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC