Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Port Deal to Close Tomorrow......that's right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:25 PM
Original message
Port Deal to Close Tomorrow......that's right
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/01/060301222720.m...

US lawmakers were losing hope of being able to block the controversial takeover of operations at several US ports by a United Arab Emirates-owned firm, with the deal becoming final on Thursday.

Members of Congress from both parties kept up their attacks against the impending 6.8 billion dollar sale of the British firm which manages the ports to Dubai Ports World, citing security concerns.

They conceded, however, that they are powerless to prevent the sale from going forward, and placed their hope in an 11th-hour intervention by US President George W. Bush.

"He's the only one that can stop it," Democratic US Senator Frank Lautenberg told AFP Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, that 45 days went by fast!
It's like I slept right through it! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Dang,
you got that right! I know time seems to have sped up, but this is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. The US government can not stop a British company from selling to someone
The council on foreign investment (or named close to that) can stop foreign companies from building or doing business in the US. But the sale is between two parties they have no control over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Its that fuzzy math again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is Bush the only one who can stop it?
Jebus, he really IS a freakin' dictator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdsilv Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Can't the individual port authorities just refuse to honor the contracts??
...or congress can pass legislation outlawing this, or simply withold funds to pay DPW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. They Have To Ink The Deal, So That They Can Sue...
the snot out of us when congress does say no.

The UAE and its supporters are gonna make big money either way, no?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I am not sure Congress can overturn this, WillyT.
Pretty sure the deal is set in stone.

Hastert and Frist will stand on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Is That A WTO Type Of Thingy, Or Does Congress Not Count Anymore ???
Is this like a treaty, or has corporate America taken over all government authority?

Is Carlyle the new Sovereign???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. You know, I've been thinking about that...
and I think one of the reasons the Dems are hanging back is they see the Repub's outrage at the Admin and are just letting them spew.

It is now painfully clear to the pubs that not only does bush hold Dems in contempt, he will roll over anyone to accomplish BFEE ends.

Kinda like if you knew your friend was being defrauded by his neighbor.
You keep telling him and he infers that you are just envious and wish that you had discretionary funds that his neighbor could invest for you, too.
One day friend realizes that his neighbor has been screwing him all along.
Wouldn't you be content to watch friend raise hell with neighbor, all self-righteous and such, just hold your tongue until you could help friend bury the bastard in Court?

That is analogical to what I think is going on.

I do not think you are far off the mark with your point about Carlyle and the new Sovereign.

It's a New World, WillyT.

And I don't like it one bit.

By the way, my family is long-term KBR (Kellogg, Brown&Root).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have been saying this since this deal was announced...
The admin totally misunderestimated the public reaction on this one.

Americans have become so complacent, the BFEE just thought it would ooze on by.

Hah!

Kinda like getting bit by a sleeping dog.

Sh*t, meet fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are absolutely correct.
Bush really doesn't understand how angry people on the right and the left are about this. Doesn't have a freakin' clue, or doesn't care. I read a headline the other day, saying Bush "shrugs off" concern about the port deal. "Shrugs off"??? I really think the guy's going to get his ass kicked from here to Georgia on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ummm... congress can do whatever it wants.
At the very least, they could hold up the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not without a vote, brainshrub.
Hastert and Frist have already rolled on this one.

It would almost take riots in the streets to stop this, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. republican crony no-bid capitalism gone wild imo...
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Dubai ports transaction was already a done deal
That 45-day waiting period was a smoke screen to throw the Congress a bone and put a damper on the public's outrage. The Village Idiot is of the opinion that he doesn't answer to the representatives the people of this country sent to Washington to be their voice in the House and Senate.

That's how the Bush family works. If it's in THEIR interest, nothing will stop them, come hell or high water - or the United States Congress and their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why the hell do you think he went to Afghanistan...
so that he could contemplate the deal from a venue closer to UAE? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Even if Congress acts, Bu$h will veto
No chance of a Congressional overide of Bu$h's veto, none.

The UAE Port deal is as good as done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalPowered Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That may be true but a recorded vote would be more
advantageous for dems. Everyone should be on record for this deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. That Was Pretty Fucking Fast!
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 06:58 PM by Dinger
Hey, fuck this shit. Insane, just fucking insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Anybody doubt that America is now a Neo Fascist State?
I have no doubts. America is a Neo Fascist State.

The Dem Party is a usefull as teats on a boar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. They just crawled into
the casket. All we have to do is nail it shut. Most of the Republicans are dirtying their diapers over this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Broken link
Is this published anywhere else? They're bad, but DPW promised a 45-day review last week - if they turn around to try to close tomorrow, you'd think there'd be a huge outcry. Lou Dobbs would be on it! I wonder if maybe this article was pulled for inaccuracies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't know about this, Link is broken
and I have never even heard of the breitbart.com... What about A/P, Yahoo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can you imagine that debate question coming up in 2000?
Okay, Candidate Gore and Candidate Bush, here is the scenario: New York City gets attacked by Arabs in 2001, and in 2006 you and only you can stop a port deal from going through that will hand the New York ports over to an Arab controlled country. What will you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
25.  We spreading democracy, don't ya know
Just like yahoo in china. This is a fucked up administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Doesn't that mean the deal between the Brits and the UAE will close
tomorrow? I'm not trying to side with anyone here, but I think the media is not explaining this deal very well.

I think...we cannot stop a sale by the Brits! That's the piece that is going to go through tomorrow. The US, with the cooperation of the UAE, will do further study on Okaying the deal and permitting the UAE to operate OUR ports. At the end of the 45 days, Shrub has the ability to sign the deal of not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Why can't they get a TRO since the legal process wasn't followed?
:shrug: If ANY security concerns were raised and auto 45 day thingy was supposed to take place before a deal could be made.

How come members don't go to court and obtain a temporary restraining order. The administration failed to follow legal procedure and, obviously, incalculable harm is possible if this deal goes through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC