Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This might be a great letter to print and give out to our own officials. >

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:51 PM
Original message
This might be a great letter to print and give out to our own officials. >
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 11:54 PM by helderheid
New Mexico: Governor's Letter to All State Election Directors
By New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson
March 01, 2006
To the State Officials of the 50 United States of America


Download Final Version of New Mexico's Paper Ballot Bill (SB 295):
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/New%20Mexico/SENATE%20BILL%20295%20Paper%20Ballots.doc

Dear Colleagues,

The hallmark of American democracy is one person, one vote.

The reason refugees and immigrants, students and professionals from around the world continue to flock toward our shores is because we fundamentally believe in the worth of each person. We believe “all men and all women are created equal.” We believe that regardless of gender, race, class or creed – all voices deserve respect; all voices deserve to be heard. And when it comes to elections, all votes deserve to be counted.

But is our democracy, is our hallmark principle of one person, one vote, on solid ground?

Recent elections would suggest that democracy, the greatest system of government in the world, can be broken.
As the world witnessed in 2000, the sanctity of the ballot box and the integrity of our government are vulnerable. The people of the United States lost faith in the electoral process, and the covenant between citizens and elected officials deteriorated. Those national officials scrambled to pass legislation to restore voter confidence, but in 2004, inaccurate exit polls raised further doubts about electronic voting machines without a verifiable paper record.

In New Mexico, a coalition of concerned citizens demanded action. Working together with these citizens and the state legislature, I signed several laws which guarantee that every ballot is counted. New Mexico improved and standardized training for poll workers. We established statewide standards for provisional ballots to ensure that voters in low-income areas will not disenfranchised. We made absentee voting fair, simple, and uniform.

And we took one more critical step to ensure one person, one vote.


On March 2, 2006, I will sign a bill that will transition New Mexico to an all paper-ballot system using optical scanners to count the vote. Paper ballots are the least expensive, most secure form of voting available. Having marked their votes with pen and paper, voters will walk out of the booth and know their voices have been heard. Optical scanners will quickly and accurately provide results, while in the event of a recount, the ballots themselves will be a permanent, verifiable record of the people’s directions to their government.

Some believe that computer touch screen machines are the future of electoral systems, but the technology simply fails to pass the test of reliability. As anyone who uses one can attest, computers break down, get viruses, lose information, and corrupt data. We know this to be the case, and so we back-up our files to ensure nothing important is lost. Paper ballots serve as the ultimate back-up for our elections, providing secure and permanent verification of the will of the people.

New Mexico has chosen paper ballots as the best system to secure our election process. With the new system in place, future elections will be secure, honest, and verifiable. Every vote will count and the citizens of our state will know that their government belongs to them.

One person, one vote is in jeopardy if we do not act boldly and immediately. American citizens once took for granted that every vote mattered, but no longer. It is time that we, the elected state officials, work to restore American’s confidence in our electoral systems and undertake reform that moves to eliminate skepticism and uncertainty.

When a vote is cast, a vote should be counted. With paper ballots we will have a record. With paper ballots the fundamental principle of one person, one vote is safe.

Sincerely,


Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh and, GOOD ON THE GOV!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick in the morning - c'mon DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. If only Ohio knew this...
but then again. It is an Ohio institution.

I hear you Helderheid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. thanks! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go Governor Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks Bill!
This is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is good to see
I hope that
1) Every Governor starts to care about the integrity of the voting appartus.
2) In addition to what he advocates,
a) Proprietary software gets kicked to the curb on the optical scan machines and
b) the integrity of the central switches is similary scrutinized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. The longest journey begins with the first step.
Yes......................I see a ray of Hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. must admit I did a double take when I saw who wrote this - of course some
are speculating he'll be running for president in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. This is soo good
to see I was just saying to someone "they're going to do it to us again in 2008" if we use electronic voting, it really scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. My only concern if we go back to paper is that we get rid of the central
tabulators. THAT'S where they screw us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Optical scanners will quickly and accurately provide results..."
Optical scanners is still black box voting.

This is no victory. This is a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yep. The Hursti Hack was on an Optical Scanner...

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002164.htm

Without mandatory, random recounts before and after the certification of the election, optical ballots are just a feel-good device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Absolutely - we need meaningful audits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Snatched from the vortex. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is a keeper - and yes worth passing.......
....on to our representatives. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.:bounce: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thank YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Glad he's finally come around
He was NO HELP and in fact something of a hindrance after 2004. It was very strange and no one I knew had a good feeling about it. When a Dem gets obstructionist on an issue like this, it raises eyebrows. Like I said: glad he's finally on our side (apparently).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC