Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 battalions, 1 battalion, none.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:09 AM
Original message
3 battalions, 1 battalion, none.
It's not as if 3 battalions has any significance (1000-3000 soldiers) in Iraq.

After 3 years, 25 battalions would be an utter failure. They need, at a minimum, 100 battalions.

They have, count 'em, none.

In case you haven't guessed, this a a major clusterfuck.

In less than 4 years the Axis was crushed in WWII (official US involvement).

But wait a minute...The Iraqis DO have a hundred battalions...fighting against us and each other.

This is an insane clusterfuck.

:grr::cry::grr::cry::grr:

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yea, don't ya just love it! I can't remember where I heard this but
somebody said "we need to just tell the Iraqi's that we got rid of their dictator, it's their Country now, and they're going to have to handle it! We're leaving."

I was glad to hear somebody say that, and I sure hope it takes hold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It might have worked 35 months ago.
Now? No way.

There's a new dictator in town.


:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. There was some kind of lead up to that admission, something positive
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 01:06 AM by The_Casual_Observer
like there were 2000 battle ready regiments or what not. The part about zero was a footnote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC